{"title":"已发表的磺酰脲毒性报告中奥曲肽剂量的变化:1988年至今的系统综述。","authors":"Erin Ryan, William Rushton","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-01054-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Octreotide is commonly used to treat hypoglycemia due to sulfonylurea toxicity, but optimal dosing for this indication is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review to identify cases in the medical literature of octreotide use for sulfonylurea poisoning. Literature published on octreotide and sulfonylureas between octreotide's FDA approval on 10/21/1988 and 8/15/2024 was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty unique patient cases (66 adults/adolescents and 14 pediatric patients) from 61 sources were included in the final analysis. These included 41 octreotide dosing strategies that differed in dose, frequency, and/or route of administration. Subcutaneous dosing, primarily within the range of 50-100 mcg per dose at a frequency of every 6-8 h, was the most common regimen in adults while intravenous dosing of 1 mcg/kg was most prevalent in pediatrics. There were no significant differences in duration of therapy or total dose of octreotide in adults with intermittent subcutaneous vs intravenous dosing. Treatment of hypoglycemia and maintenance of euglycemia was similar among all routes of administration. Infusions had similar durations but higher total doses of octreotide. Higher intermittent bolus doses were associated with shorter durations of therapy. Intentional exposures were associated with higher doses and longer duration of treatment with octreotide. Three adverse reactions to octreotide were reported. Except for 2 cases, all patients survived without any long-term complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite widespread variation in octreotide dosing and administration, our report showed similar efficacy and safety with various octreotide dosing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in Octreotide Dosing in Published Reports of Sulfonylurea Toxicity: A Systematic Review, 1988-Present.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Ryan, William Rushton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-024-01054-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Octreotide is commonly used to treat hypoglycemia due to sulfonylurea toxicity, but optimal dosing for this indication is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review to identify cases in the medical literature of octreotide use for sulfonylurea poisoning. Literature published on octreotide and sulfonylureas between octreotide's FDA approval on 10/21/1988 and 8/15/2024 was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty unique patient cases (66 adults/adolescents and 14 pediatric patients) from 61 sources were included in the final analysis. These included 41 octreotide dosing strategies that differed in dose, frequency, and/or route of administration. Subcutaneous dosing, primarily within the range of 50-100 mcg per dose at a frequency of every 6-8 h, was the most common regimen in adults while intravenous dosing of 1 mcg/kg was most prevalent in pediatrics. There were no significant differences in duration of therapy or total dose of octreotide in adults with intermittent subcutaneous vs intravenous dosing. Treatment of hypoglycemia and maintenance of euglycemia was similar among all routes of administration. Infusions had similar durations but higher total doses of octreotide. Higher intermittent bolus doses were associated with shorter durations of therapy. Intentional exposures were associated with higher doses and longer duration of treatment with octreotide. Three adverse reactions to octreotide were reported. Except for 2 cases, all patients survived without any long-term complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite widespread variation in octreotide dosing and administration, our report showed similar efficacy and safety with various octreotide dosing practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-01054-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-01054-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variations in Octreotide Dosing in Published Reports of Sulfonylurea Toxicity: A Systematic Review, 1988-Present.
Background: Octreotide is commonly used to treat hypoglycemia due to sulfonylurea toxicity, but optimal dosing for this indication is not well defined.
Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify cases in the medical literature of octreotide use for sulfonylurea poisoning. Literature published on octreotide and sulfonylureas between octreotide's FDA approval on 10/21/1988 and 8/15/2024 was reviewed.
Results: Eighty unique patient cases (66 adults/adolescents and 14 pediatric patients) from 61 sources were included in the final analysis. These included 41 octreotide dosing strategies that differed in dose, frequency, and/or route of administration. Subcutaneous dosing, primarily within the range of 50-100 mcg per dose at a frequency of every 6-8 h, was the most common regimen in adults while intravenous dosing of 1 mcg/kg was most prevalent in pediatrics. There were no significant differences in duration of therapy or total dose of octreotide in adults with intermittent subcutaneous vs intravenous dosing. Treatment of hypoglycemia and maintenance of euglycemia was similar among all routes of administration. Infusions had similar durations but higher total doses of octreotide. Higher intermittent bolus doses were associated with shorter durations of therapy. Intentional exposures were associated with higher doses and longer duration of treatment with octreotide. Three adverse reactions to octreotide were reported. Except for 2 cases, all patients survived without any long-term complications.
Conclusion: Despite widespread variation in octreotide dosing and administration, our report showed similar efficacy and safety with various octreotide dosing practices.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers. JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others. For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.