利用临床危险因素和术中注射特征对内镜膀胱输尿管反流治疗成功的可预测性。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.022
Ömer Barış Yücel, Ali Tekin, Sibel Tiryaki, Denizay Avcı, Yiğit Özel, İbrahim Ulman
{"title":"利用临床危险因素和术中注射特征对内镜膀胱输尿管反流治疗成功的可预测性。","authors":"Ömer Barış Yücel, Ali Tekin, Sibel Tiryaki, Denizay Avcı, Yiğit Özel, İbrahim Ulman","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The guidelines lack clarity on how to follow the patients after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The most discussed question is the need for voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Risk-based approaches that consider patient characteristics, disease severity, or factors related to the surgery itself could reduce its use, but a satisfactory predictive model has not yet been established. We hypothesized surgeons can predict the treatment success evaluating the procedure and risk factors and analyzed the assessments of five experts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical data of 50 patients (75 renal units) from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. Detailed medical history (including DMSA, USG, VCUG reports, voiding symptoms, presence of febrile UTI, etc.) and video records of the procedure were evaluated blindly by five expert surgeons. Experts evaluated the injection volume, needle placement site, and mound appearance using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on these assessments, they predicted the likelihood of surgical success and if there was a high risk for obstruction (yes/no).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent responses among evaluators were observed for needle placement site (p < 0.001), but not for injection volume and mound appearance (p = 0.055, p = 0.077, respectively). The scores provided by all evaluators for needle placement site, injection volume, and mound appearance were consistent with their predictions for success (p < 0.001 for all). However, none of the scores given by the evaluators for the three parameters were consistent with actual success (p > 0.05 for all) and predictability for success or obstruction was low for all evaluators (p > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessment of the operation videos even accompanied with a comprehensive medical history including all known risk factors does not aid in predicting outcomes for endoscopic VUR treatment. Our study highlights the need for better criteria to recommend individualized management strategies and the insecurity of categorizing surgeries as \"high-risk\" or \"safe\" based solely on the intraoperative satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictability of success of endoscopic vesicoureteral reflux treatment utilizing clinical risk factors and intraoperative injection characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Barış Yücel, Ali Tekin, Sibel Tiryaki, Denizay Avcı, Yiğit Özel, İbrahim Ulman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The guidelines lack clarity on how to follow the patients after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The most discussed question is the need for voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Risk-based approaches that consider patient characteristics, disease severity, or factors related to the surgery itself could reduce its use, but a satisfactory predictive model has not yet been established. We hypothesized surgeons can predict the treatment success evaluating the procedure and risk factors and analyzed the assessments of five experts on the subject.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical data of 50 patients (75 renal units) from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. Detailed medical history (including DMSA, USG, VCUG reports, voiding symptoms, presence of febrile UTI, etc.) and video records of the procedure were evaluated blindly by five expert surgeons. Experts evaluated the injection volume, needle placement site, and mound appearance using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on these assessments, they predicted the likelihood of surgical success and if there was a high risk for obstruction (yes/no).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent responses among evaluators were observed for needle placement site (p < 0.001), but not for injection volume and mound appearance (p = 0.055, p = 0.077, respectively). The scores provided by all evaluators for needle placement site, injection volume, and mound appearance were consistent with their predictions for success (p < 0.001 for all). However, none of the scores given by the evaluators for the three parameters were consistent with actual success (p > 0.05 for all) and predictability for success or obstruction was low for all evaluators (p > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The assessment of the operation videos even accompanied with a comprehensive medical history including all known risk factors does not aid in predicting outcomes for endoscopic VUR treatment. Our study highlights the need for better criteria to recommend individualized management strategies and the insecurity of categorizing surgeries as \\\"high-risk\\\" or \\\"safe\\\" based solely on the intraoperative satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.12.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:指南缺乏对内镜治疗膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)后如何随访患者的明确规定。讨论最多的问题是是否需要排尿膀胱尿道造影(VCUG)。考虑患者特征、疾病严重程度或与手术本身相关的因素的基于风险的方法可以减少其使用,但尚未建立令人满意的预测模型。我们假设外科医生可以通过评估手术过程和风险因素来预测治疗成功,并分析了五位专家对该主题的评估。材料与方法:对2015 - 2021年50例患者(75肾单位)的临床资料进行分析。详细的病史(包括DMSA、USG、VCUG报告、排尿症状、是否存在发热UTI等)和手术视频记录由5位专家外科医生进行盲目评估。专家使用5分李克特量表评估注射量、针头放置位置和丘状外观。基于这些评估,他们预测手术成功的可能性以及是否存在梗阻的高风险(是/否)。结果:评估者对针头放置位置的反应一致(p < 0.05),所有评估者对成功或阻塞的可预测性都很低(p < 0.05)。结论:对手术视频的评估,即使伴有包括所有已知危险因素的全面病史,也无助于预测内镜下VUR治疗的结果。我们的研究强调需要更好的标准来推荐个体化的管理策略,以及仅仅根据术中满意度将手术分类为“高风险”或“安全”的不安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictability of success of endoscopic vesicoureteral reflux treatment utilizing clinical risk factors and intraoperative injection characteristics.

Introduction: The guidelines lack clarity on how to follow the patients after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The most discussed question is the need for voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Risk-based approaches that consider patient characteristics, disease severity, or factors related to the surgery itself could reduce its use, but a satisfactory predictive model has not yet been established. We hypothesized surgeons can predict the treatment success evaluating the procedure and risk factors and analyzed the assessments of five experts on the subject.

Materials and methods: Clinical data of 50 patients (75 renal units) from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. Detailed medical history (including DMSA, USG, VCUG reports, voiding symptoms, presence of febrile UTI, etc.) and video records of the procedure were evaluated blindly by five expert surgeons. Experts evaluated the injection volume, needle placement site, and mound appearance using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on these assessments, they predicted the likelihood of surgical success and if there was a high risk for obstruction (yes/no).

Results: Consistent responses among evaluators were observed for needle placement site (p < 0.001), but not for injection volume and mound appearance (p = 0.055, p = 0.077, respectively). The scores provided by all evaluators for needle placement site, injection volume, and mound appearance were consistent with their predictions for success (p < 0.001 for all). However, none of the scores given by the evaluators for the three parameters were consistent with actual success (p > 0.05 for all) and predictability for success or obstruction was low for all evaluators (p > 0.05 for all).

Conclusion: The assessment of the operation videos even accompanied with a comprehensive medical history including all known risk factors does not aid in predicting outcomes for endoscopic VUR treatment. Our study highlights the need for better criteria to recommend individualized management strategies and the insecurity of categorizing surgeries as "high-risk" or "safe" based solely on the intraoperative satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editors on "International consensus on research priorities in hypospadias using a Delphi study approach". The influence of positive and negative intraoperative feedback in laparoscopic simulation in pediatric urology training. Alkaline urine is associated with increased risk of calcium phosphate nephrolithiasis in medically complex children receiving enteral nutrition. The utilization of a spare ureter to create a continent catheterizable channel to the bladder in pediatric patients. Response to the editorial commentary on 'When you cannot trust what you see: The confounding effect'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1