{"title":"一种新的选择性纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗临床外周期浸润性非小细胞肺癌:倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Hua He, Changsheng Yi, Wenteng Hu, Yu Zhou, Xiaofei Zeng, Quan Zhang, Shuo Sun, Ruijiang Lin, Peng Yue, Minjie Ma, Chang Chen","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal extent of lymph node resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate in the medical community. We aimed to assess the surgical and prognostic outcomes based on the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for resectable clinical stage IA NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2016 to 2018, 1,166 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection (C-MLND) or selective mediastinal lymph node dissection (S-MLND) at five hospitals were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, survival and disease control were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>S-MLND and C-MLND were performed on 197 and 969 patients, respectively. After PSM, each group comprised 126 patients and there was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C-MLND <i>vs.</i> S-MLND, 87.5% <i>vs.</i> 82.9%; P=0.32) or overall survival (OS) (C-MLND <i>vs.</i> S-MLND, 92.0% <i>vs.</i> 95.9%; P=0.39) between the groups. Similar results were observed for perioperative parameters, pN2 detection (6.3% <i>vs.</i> 4.8%, P=0.11) and recurrence patterns (P=0.28). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the S-MLND cohort than that in the C-MLND cohort (12.7% <i>vs.</i> 23.0%, P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S-MLND demonstrated outcomes that were comparable to those of C-MLND and a reduction in complications, indicating the potential of S-MLND as an alternative approach for selected patients with stage IA NSCLC. Prospective, randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and establish clear clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 12","pages":"8280-8291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new selective mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical peripheral stage IA invasive non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Hua He, Changsheng Yi, Wenteng Hu, Yu Zhou, Xiaofei Zeng, Quan Zhang, Shuo Sun, Ruijiang Lin, Peng Yue, Minjie Ma, Chang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal extent of lymph node resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate in the medical community. We aimed to assess the surgical and prognostic outcomes based on the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for resectable clinical stage IA NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2016 to 2018, 1,166 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection (C-MLND) or selective mediastinal lymph node dissection (S-MLND) at five hospitals were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, survival and disease control were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>S-MLND and C-MLND were performed on 197 and 969 patients, respectively. After PSM, each group comprised 126 patients and there was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C-MLND <i>vs.</i> S-MLND, 87.5% <i>vs.</i> 82.9%; P=0.32) or overall survival (OS) (C-MLND <i>vs.</i> S-MLND, 92.0% <i>vs.</i> 95.9%; P=0.39) between the groups. Similar results were observed for perioperative parameters, pN2 detection (6.3% <i>vs.</i> 4.8%, P=0.11) and recurrence patterns (P=0.28). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the S-MLND cohort than that in the C-MLND cohort (12.7% <i>vs.</i> 23.0%, P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S-MLND demonstrated outcomes that were comparable to those of C-MLND and a reduction in complications, indicating the potential of S-MLND as an alternative approach for selected patients with stage IA NSCLC. Prospective, randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and establish clear clinical guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"8280-8291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)淋巴结切除的最佳范围仍然是医学界争论的话题。我们的目的是根据可切除的IA期NSCLC的纵隔淋巴结清扫(MLND)的程度来评估手术和预后结果。方法:2016年至2018年,在5家医院接受肺叶切除术或节段切除术合并完全纵隔淋巴结清扫(C-MLND)或选择性纵隔淋巴结清扫(S-MLND)的1166例临床IA期非小细胞肺癌患者。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于减少选择偏差。比较两组围手术期参数、术后并发症、生存率及疾病控制情况。结果:S-MLND 197例,C-MLND 969例。PSM后,每组126例患者,5年无复发生存率(RFS)无显著差异(C-MLND vs. S-MLND, 87.5% vs. 82.9%;P=0.32)或总生存期(OS) (C-MLND vs. S-MLND, 92.0% vs. 95.9%;P=0.39)。围手术期参数、pN2检测(6.3% vs. 4.8%, P=0.11)和复发类型(P=0.28)的结果相似。但S-MLND组术后并发症发生率明显低于C-MLND组(12.7% vs. 23.0%, P=0.03)。结论:S-MLND显示出与C-MLND相当的结果,并且并发症减少,表明S-MLND作为选定的IA期NSCLC患者的替代方法的潜力。推荐前瞻性随机试验来证实这些发现并建立明确的临床指南。
A new selective mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical peripheral stage IA invasive non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
Background: The optimal extent of lymph node resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a topic of debate in the medical community. We aimed to assess the surgical and prognostic outcomes based on the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for resectable clinical stage IA NSCLC.
Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 1,166 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection (C-MLND) or selective mediastinal lymph node dissection (S-MLND) at five hospitals were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. Perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, survival and disease control were compared between the groups.
Results: S-MLND and C-MLND were performed on 197 and 969 patients, respectively. After PSM, each group comprised 126 patients and there was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (C-MLND vs. S-MLND, 87.5% vs. 82.9%; P=0.32) or overall survival (OS) (C-MLND vs. S-MLND, 92.0% vs. 95.9%; P=0.39) between the groups. Similar results were observed for perioperative parameters, pN2 detection (6.3% vs. 4.8%, P=0.11) and recurrence patterns (P=0.28). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the S-MLND cohort than that in the C-MLND cohort (12.7% vs. 23.0%, P=0.03).
Conclusions: S-MLND demonstrated outcomes that were comparable to those of C-MLND and a reduction in complications, indicating the potential of S-MLND as an alternative approach for selected patients with stage IA NSCLC. Prospective, randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and establish clear clinical guidelines.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.