评估澳大利亚的初级保健支出:初级保健支出(PC支出)模型。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52574
Michael Wright, Shona Bates, Andrew W Bazemore, Michael R Kidd
{"title":"评估澳大利亚的初级保健支出:初级保健支出(PC支出)模型。","authors":"Michael Wright, Shona Bates, Andrew W Bazemore, Michael R Kidd","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the distribution of health care expenditure (public and private) for primary care and primary health care as proportions of overall health care funding.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The Primary Care Spend model; estimated distribution of expenditure for three tiers of primary care services by provider and function.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary Care Spend model applied to Australian health expenditure, public and private, 2020-21, from a health sector perspective, as recorded by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportions of all health care spending for essential community and primary health care functions (tier A), comprehensive primary care (services delivered in general practices and family physician clinics; tier B), and enhanced primary care services (long-term holistic patient care; tier C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020-21, 33.2% of health spending in Australia was classified as primary health care spending (tier A), 6.0% as comprehensive primary care services (tier B), and 0.8% as long term holistic patient care services (tier C).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of the Primary Care Spend model to Australian data provides a more nuanced analysis of expenditure for primary health care than routine health expenditure reports. Its output could be used to inform targets for spending on different tiers, types, and locations of primary care, especially comprehensive and other high value primary care services, and to monitor progress toward these targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating primary care expenditure in Australia: the Primary Care Spend (PC Spend) model.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Wright, Shona Bates, Andrew W Bazemore, Michael R Kidd\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the distribution of health care expenditure (public and private) for primary care and primary health care as proportions of overall health care funding.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The Primary Care Spend model; estimated distribution of expenditure for three tiers of primary care services by provider and function.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary Care Spend model applied to Australian health expenditure, public and private, 2020-21, from a health sector perspective, as recorded by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportions of all health care spending for essential community and primary health care functions (tier A), comprehensive primary care (services delivered in general practices and family physician clinics; tier B), and enhanced primary care services (long-term holistic patient care; tier C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020-21, 33.2% of health spending in Australia was classified as primary health care spending (tier A), 6.0% as comprehensive primary care services (tier B), and 0.8% as long term holistic patient care services (tier C).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of the Primary Care Spend model to Australian data provides a more nuanced analysis of expenditure for primary health care than routine health expenditure reports. Its output could be used to inform targets for spending on different tiers, types, and locations of primary care, especially comprehensive and other high value primary care services, and to monitor progress toward these targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估用于初级保健和初级保健的卫生保健支出(公共和私人)在卫生保健资金总额中所占的比例。研究设计:初级保健支出模型;按提供者和职能分列的三级初级保健服务支出的估计分布情况。背景:根据澳大利亚卫生和福利研究所的记录,从卫生部门的角度,初级保健支出模型适用于2020-21年澳大利亚公共和私营卫生支出。主要结果衡量指标:用于基本社区和初级卫生保健职能(A级)、综合初级保健(在全科诊所和家庭医生诊所提供的服务)的所有卫生保健支出的比例;B级),并加强初级保健服务(长期整体病人护理;结果:2020- 2021年,澳大利亚卫生支出的33.2%被分类为初级卫生保健支出(A级),6.0%被分类为综合初级卫生保健服务(B级),0.8%被分类为长期整体患者护理服务(C级)。结论:将初级卫生保健支出模型应用于澳大利亚数据,提供了比常规卫生支出报告更细致入微的初级卫生保健支出分析。其产出可用于为不同层次、类型和地点的初级保健,特别是综合和其他高价值初级保健服务的支出目标提供信息,并监测实现这些目标的进展情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating primary care expenditure in Australia: the Primary Care Spend (PC Spend) model.

Objectives: To assess the distribution of health care expenditure (public and private) for primary care and primary health care as proportions of overall health care funding.

Study design: The Primary Care Spend model; estimated distribution of expenditure for three tiers of primary care services by provider and function.

Setting: Primary Care Spend model applied to Australian health expenditure, public and private, 2020-21, from a health sector perspective, as recorded by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

Main outcome measures: Proportions of all health care spending for essential community and primary health care functions (tier A), comprehensive primary care (services delivered in general practices and family physician clinics; tier B), and enhanced primary care services (long-term holistic patient care; tier C).

Results: In 2020-21, 33.2% of health spending in Australia was classified as primary health care spending (tier A), 6.0% as comprehensive primary care services (tier B), and 0.8% as long term holistic patient care services (tier C).

Conclusions: The application of the Primary Care Spend model to Australian data provides a more nuanced analysis of expenditure for primary health care than routine health expenditure reports. Its output could be used to inform targets for spending on different tiers, types, and locations of primary care, especially comprehensive and other high value primary care services, and to monitor progress toward these targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Responding to reports of nitazene toxicity in Australia. Consensus recommendations on multiple sclerosis management in Australia and New Zealand: part 1. Consensus recommendations on multiple sclerosis management in Australia and New Zealand: part 2. Consideration of sex and gender: an analysis of Australian clinical guidelines. Potentially preventable medication-related hospitalisations with cardiovascular disease of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Queensland, 2013-2017: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1