神经结节病管理的共识建议:美国专家德尔菲调查。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200429
Giovanna Sophia Manzano, James Eaton, Michael Levy, Justin R Abbatemarco, Allen J Aksamit, Pria Anand, Denis T Balaban, Paula Barreras, Robert P Baughman, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Roberto Bomprezzi, Tracey A Cho, Bart Chwalisz, Stacey Lynn Clardy, David B Clifford, Eoin P Flanagan, Jeffrey M Gelfand, George Kyle Harrold, Spencer K Hutto, Siddharama Pawate, Noellie Rivera Torres, Lama Abdel-Wahed, Steven Richard Dunham, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Brandon Moss, Carlos A Pardo, Rohini D Samudralwar, Nagagopal Venna, Aram Zabeti, Ilya Kister
{"title":"神经结节病管理的共识建议:美国专家德尔菲调查。","authors":"Giovanna Sophia Manzano, James Eaton, Michael Levy, Justin R Abbatemarco, Allen J Aksamit, Pria Anand, Denis T Balaban, Paula Barreras, Robert P Baughman, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Roberto Bomprezzi, Tracey A Cho, Bart Chwalisz, Stacey Lynn Clardy, David B Clifford, Eoin P Flanagan, Jeffrey M Gelfand, George Kyle Harrold, Spencer K Hutto, Siddharama Pawate, Noellie Rivera Torres, Lama Abdel-Wahed, Steven Richard Dunham, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Brandon Moss, Carlos A Pardo, Rohini D Samudralwar, Nagagopal Venna, Aram Zabeti, Ilya Kister","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neurosarcoidosis poses a diagnostic and management challenge due to its rarity, phenotypic variability, and lack of randomized controlled studies to guide treatment selection. Recommendations for management based on expert opinion are useful in clinical practice and provide a framework for designing prospective studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this Delphi survey study, specialists with experience in managing patients with neurosarcoidosis were invited to anonymously complete 2 surveys about key elements of evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and long-term management of neurosarcoidosis. Expert consensus recommendations were adopted if >80% threshold of agreement was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 41 invited expert clinicians across the United States, 32 (78%) participated in the study. All round 1 respondents self-identified as neuroimmunologists (except for 1 pulmonologist). Consensus was reached regarding the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity to guide the choice of initial immunosuppression in both the acute (relapse) and maintenance phases. Experts endorsed the use of TNF-α inhibitors as first-line agents in selected phenotypes with poor prognosis. Neuroimaging was recommended to complement clinical surveillance for treatment response.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There was agreement on several key issues, most importantly on the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity when deciding initial treatment. No consensus was achieved on the dosing and duration of specific immunosuppressants, nor regarding the management of the peripheral nervous system manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. These topics warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 2","pages":"e200429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Neurosarcoidosis: A Delphi Survey of Experts Across the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Sophia Manzano, James Eaton, Michael Levy, Justin R Abbatemarco, Allen J Aksamit, Pria Anand, Denis T Balaban, Paula Barreras, Robert P Baughman, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Roberto Bomprezzi, Tracey A Cho, Bart Chwalisz, Stacey Lynn Clardy, David B Clifford, Eoin P Flanagan, Jeffrey M Gelfand, George Kyle Harrold, Spencer K Hutto, Siddharama Pawate, Noellie Rivera Torres, Lama Abdel-Wahed, Steven Richard Dunham, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Brandon Moss, Carlos A Pardo, Rohini D Samudralwar, Nagagopal Venna, Aram Zabeti, Ilya Kister\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neurosarcoidosis poses a diagnostic and management challenge due to its rarity, phenotypic variability, and lack of randomized controlled studies to guide treatment selection. Recommendations for management based on expert opinion are useful in clinical practice and provide a framework for designing prospective studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this Delphi survey study, specialists with experience in managing patients with neurosarcoidosis were invited to anonymously complete 2 surveys about key elements of evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and long-term management of neurosarcoidosis. Expert consensus recommendations were adopted if >80% threshold of agreement was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 41 invited expert clinicians across the United States, 32 (78%) participated in the study. All round 1 respondents self-identified as neuroimmunologists (except for 1 pulmonologist). Consensus was reached regarding the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity to guide the choice of initial immunosuppression in both the acute (relapse) and maintenance phases. Experts endorsed the use of TNF-α inhibitors as first-line agents in selected phenotypes with poor prognosis. Neuroimaging was recommended to complement clinical surveillance for treatment response.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There was agreement on several key issues, most importantly on the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity when deciding initial treatment. No consensus was achieved on the dosing and duration of specific immunosuppressants, nor regarding the management of the peripheral nervous system manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. These topics warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e200429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:神经结节病由于其罕见性、表型变异性和缺乏随机对照研究来指导治疗选择,给诊断和治疗带来了挑战。基于专家意见的管理建议在临床实践中是有用的,并为设计前瞻性研究提供了一个框架。方法:在德尔菲调查研究中,邀请具有神经结节病治疗经验的专家匿名完成2份关于神经结节病的评估、诊断、治疗、监测和长期管理等关键因素的调查。如果达到80%的同意阈值,则采用专家共识建议。结果:在美国41位受邀的临床专家中,32位(78%)参与了研究。所有第一轮受访者都自称为神经免疫学家(1名肺科医生除外)。共识是需要考虑神经结节病的表型和严重程度,以指导急性(复发)和维持期初始免疫抑制的选择。专家支持TNF-α抑制剂作为一线药物用于选择预后不良的表型。神经影像学建议补充临床监测治疗反应。讨论:在几个关键问题上达成了一致意见,最重要的是在决定初始治疗时需要考虑神经结节病的表型和严重程度。特异性免疫抑制剂的剂量和持续时间没有达成共识,也没有关于神经结节病周围神经系统表现的管理。这些问题值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Neurosarcoidosis: A Delphi Survey of Experts Across the United States.

Background and objectives: Neurosarcoidosis poses a diagnostic and management challenge due to its rarity, phenotypic variability, and lack of randomized controlled studies to guide treatment selection. Recommendations for management based on expert opinion are useful in clinical practice and provide a framework for designing prospective studies.

Methods: In this Delphi survey study, specialists with experience in managing patients with neurosarcoidosis were invited to anonymously complete 2 surveys about key elements of evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and long-term management of neurosarcoidosis. Expert consensus recommendations were adopted if >80% threshold of agreement was reached.

Results: Of the 41 invited expert clinicians across the United States, 32 (78%) participated in the study. All round 1 respondents self-identified as neuroimmunologists (except for 1 pulmonologist). Consensus was reached regarding the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity to guide the choice of initial immunosuppression in both the acute (relapse) and maintenance phases. Experts endorsed the use of TNF-α inhibitors as first-line agents in selected phenotypes with poor prognosis. Neuroimaging was recommended to complement clinical surveillance for treatment response.

Discussion: There was agreement on several key issues, most importantly on the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity when deciding initial treatment. No consensus was achieved on the dosing and duration of specific immunosuppressants, nor regarding the management of the peripheral nervous system manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. These topics warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
A Real-World Prospective Multiple Sclerosis Pregnancy Registry in the United States: PREG-MS. Disparate Use of Diagnostic Modalities for Patients With Limited English Proficiency and Neurologic Disorders. Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Neurosarcoidosis: A Delphi Survey of Experts Across the United States. Improving the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Genetically Confirmed Adult-Onset Huntington Disease: Considering Nonmotor Presentations. National Trends in Stroke Presentation, Treatments, and Outcomes During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1