Hana Šinkovec, Paul A Kyrle, Lisbeth Eischer, Paul Gressenberger, Thomas Gary, Marianne Brodmann, Georg Heinze, Sabine Eichinger
{"title":"维也纳预测模型估计的静脉血栓栓塞和高复发风险患者的管理:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Hana Šinkovec, Paul A Kyrle, Lisbeth Eischer, Paul Gressenberger, Thomas Gary, Marianne Brodmann, Georg Heinze, Sabine Eichinger","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.5% at 1 year for a median of 13.5 months. Their median age was 56 years, and 96% were men. After the VPM risk assessment, 196 patients restarted anticoagulation. While on anticoagulation, none of the patients experienced recurrent VTE, whereas 4 patients had nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (absolute bleeding rate, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5] events per 100 patient-years). Seventy patients were left untreated after VPM risk assessment for various reasons. Among patients not using anticoagulation, 15 had recurrence (absolute recurrence rate, 18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9] events per 100 person-years). According to the extended Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of VTE recurrence in patients not on anticoagulation was 10.1% and 17.9% at 6 and 12 months after VPM risk assessment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticoagulant therapy is effective and safe in patients with an unprovoked VTE, in whom the VPM had predicted a high risk of recurrent VTE. If these patients are left untreated, the risk of recurrence is high.</p>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 1","pages":"102649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of patients with venous thromboembolism and a high recurrence risk estimated by the Vienna Prediction Model: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hana Šinkovec, Paul A Kyrle, Lisbeth Eischer, Paul Gressenberger, Thomas Gary, Marianne Brodmann, Georg Heinze, Sabine Eichinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.5% at 1 year for a median of 13.5 months. Their median age was 56 years, and 96% were men. After the VPM risk assessment, 196 patients restarted anticoagulation. While on anticoagulation, none of the patients experienced recurrent VTE, whereas 4 patients had nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (absolute bleeding rate, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5] events per 100 patient-years). Seventy patients were left untreated after VPM risk assessment for various reasons. Among patients not using anticoagulation, 15 had recurrence (absolute recurrence rate, 18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9] events per 100 person-years). According to the extended Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of VTE recurrence in patients not on anticoagulation was 10.1% and 17.9% at 6 and 12 months after VPM risk assessment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticoagulant therapy is effective and safe in patients with an unprovoked VTE, in whom the VPM had predicted a high risk of recurrent VTE. If these patients are left untreated, the risk of recurrence is high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"102649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102649","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of patients with venous thromboembolism and a high recurrence risk estimated by the Vienna Prediction Model: a prospective cohort study.
Background: The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Methods and results: We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.5% at 1 year for a median of 13.5 months. Their median age was 56 years, and 96% were men. After the VPM risk assessment, 196 patients restarted anticoagulation. While on anticoagulation, none of the patients experienced recurrent VTE, whereas 4 patients had nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (absolute bleeding rate, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.5-4.5] events per 100 patient-years). Seventy patients were left untreated after VPM risk assessment for various reasons. Among patients not using anticoagulation, 15 had recurrence (absolute recurrence rate, 18.1 [95% CI, 10.1, 29.9] events per 100 person-years). According to the extended Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of VTE recurrence in patients not on anticoagulation was 10.1% and 17.9% at 6 and 12 months after VPM risk assessment, respectively.
Conclusion: Anticoagulant therapy is effective and safe in patients with an unprovoked VTE, in whom the VPM had predicted a high risk of recurrent VTE. If these patients are left untreated, the risk of recurrence is high.