用多基因面板检测疑似遗传性乳腺癌患者的种系变异。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s00595-025-02994-3
Yusa Togashi, Masayuki Nagahashi, Mina Kashima, Chiho Okada, Chinatsu Kinjo, Ayako Miyazaki, Mako Ueda, Hiroshi Tsubamoto, Hideaki Sawai, Yasuo Miyoshi
{"title":"用多基因面板检测疑似遗传性乳腺癌患者的种系变异。","authors":"Yusa Togashi, Masayuki Nagahashi, Mina Kashima, Chiho Okada, Chinatsu Kinjo, Ayako Miyazaki, Mako Ueda, Hiroshi Tsubamoto, Hideaki Sawai, Yasuo Miyoshi","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-02994-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clarify the status of multigene panel testing for suspected hereditary breast cancer in our institute, and disclose the characteristics of the variants detected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of individuals who underwent next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel testing at our institute to investigate hereditary genetic variants for suspected hereditary breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 36 women who underwent multigene panel testing: 8 (22.2%) had a pathogenic variant, with or without other variants of uncertain significance (VUSs); 15 (41.7%) had VUSs only; and 13 (36.1%) had negative genetic test results. Of the eight pathogenic variants, five were BRCA2 variants and one each were BRCA1, MLH1, and RINT1 variants. The VUSs included BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as other breast cancer-associated genes, such as ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2. Referring to the latest ClinVar database, one of the variants identified as a VUS at diagnosis was re-determined as likely pathogenic, and three of the variants identified as VUSs at diagnosis were re-determined as benign.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VUSs are frequently identified during testing and it is important to monitor these individuals because VUS evaluations can change over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Germline variants detected by multigene panel testing in patients with suspected hereditary breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yusa Togashi, Masayuki Nagahashi, Mina Kashima, Chiho Okada, Chinatsu Kinjo, Ayako Miyazaki, Mako Ueda, Hiroshi Tsubamoto, Hideaki Sawai, Yasuo Miyoshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-025-02994-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clarify the status of multigene panel testing for suspected hereditary breast cancer in our institute, and disclose the characteristics of the variants detected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of individuals who underwent next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel testing at our institute to investigate hereditary genetic variants for suspected hereditary breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 36 women who underwent multigene panel testing: 8 (22.2%) had a pathogenic variant, with or without other variants of uncertain significance (VUSs); 15 (41.7%) had VUSs only; and 13 (36.1%) had negative genetic test results. Of the eight pathogenic variants, five were BRCA2 variants and one each were BRCA1, MLH1, and RINT1 variants. The VUSs included BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as other breast cancer-associated genes, such as ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2. Referring to the latest ClinVar database, one of the variants identified as a VUS at diagnosis was re-determined as likely pathogenic, and three of the variants identified as VUSs at diagnosis were re-determined as benign.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VUSs are frequently identified during testing and it is important to monitor these individuals because VUS evaluations can change over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-02994-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-02994-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阐明我院疑似遗传性乳腺癌多基因面板检测的现状,揭示检测到的变异特征。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,在我们研究所进行了基于下一代测序的多基因面板检测,以调查疑似遗传性乳腺癌的遗传基因变异。结果:我们确定了36名接受多基因面板检测的妇女:8名(22.2%)有致病变异,伴有或不伴有其他不确定意义的变异(VUSs);单纯VUSs 15例(41.7%);基因检测阴性13例(36.1%)。在8种致病变异中,5种是BRCA2变异,1种是BRCA1、MLH1和RINT1变异。VUSs包括BRCA1和BRCA2,以及其他乳腺癌相关基因,如ATM、CDH1、CHEK2和PALB2。参考最新的ClinVar数据库,诊断时被确定为VUS的一个变体被重新确定为可能致病,诊断时被确定为VUS的三个变体被重新确定为良性。结论:在测试过程中经常发现VUS,对这些个体进行监测很重要,因为VUS评估可能随着时间的推移而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Germline variants detected by multigene panel testing in patients with suspected hereditary breast cancer.

Purpose: To clarify the status of multigene panel testing for suspected hereditary breast cancer in our institute, and disclose the characteristics of the variants detected.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of individuals who underwent next-generation sequencing-based multigene panel testing at our institute to investigate hereditary genetic variants for suspected hereditary breast cancer.

Results: We identified 36 women who underwent multigene panel testing: 8 (22.2%) had a pathogenic variant, with or without other variants of uncertain significance (VUSs); 15 (41.7%) had VUSs only; and 13 (36.1%) had negative genetic test results. Of the eight pathogenic variants, five were BRCA2 variants and one each were BRCA1, MLH1, and RINT1 variants. The VUSs included BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as other breast cancer-associated genes, such as ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2. Referring to the latest ClinVar database, one of the variants identified as a VUS at diagnosis was re-determined as likely pathogenic, and three of the variants identified as VUSs at diagnosis were re-determined as benign.

Conclusion: VUSs are frequently identified during testing and it is important to monitor these individuals because VUS evaluations can change over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intraoperative and postoperative air leakage in anatomical pulmonary resection. Changes in surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide analysis in Japan. The Key Ripper: a specialized fixed suture-cutting device to facilitate drain removal. Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in open abdomen management. A comparison of pancreatojejunostomy using the modified Blumgart anastomosis with or without a four-needle three-loop suture device and continuous sutures for duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1