Armon Arpagaus, Aron Strub, Rahel Kuster, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Flavio Gössi, Eliska Potlukova, Stefano Bassetti, Drahomir Aujesky, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker
{"title":"通过确定与低满意度和效率相关的因素来加强跨专业查房:瑞士医疗保健专业人员的定量和定性全国调查。","authors":"Armon Arpagaus, Aron Strub, Rahel Kuster, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Flavio Gössi, Eliska Potlukova, Stefano Bassetti, Drahomir Aujesky, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker","doi":"10.57187/s.4006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>Interprofessional ward rounds are a cornerstone of patient-centred care for medical inpatients and offer opportunities to discuss and coordinate patient treatment and further management. We aimed to identify factors associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional ward rounds, as reported by physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous Swiss nationwide online survey of physicians and nurses was conducted in 28 Swiss internal medicine inpatient departments between 9 August and 19 October 2023. Analyses were conducted from November to December 2023. The primary outcome was physicians' and nurses' perceived lower satisfaction with ward rounds, which was assessed using visual analogue scales ranging from 0 to 10, with lower satisfaction defined as scores below the median. The main secondary outcome was perceived lower efficiency using a similar definition. Qualitative analysis was performed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had a response rate of 21.6% (547/2530). Of the 547 physicians and nurses included in the final analysis, the median satisfaction was 7 points (interquartile range [IQR] 6-8). A total of 61% of physicians (156/254) and 76% of nurses (224/293) reported lower satisfaction. Lower satisfaction was reported significantly more frequently by nurses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.43; p ≤0.001) and female team members (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.32-2.9; p <0.01). The median perceived efficiency of ward rounds was 7 points (IQR 5-8), and the nursing profession was associated with lower perceived efficiency (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.3-2.93; p <0.01). Adherence to in-house guidelines for ward rounds was associated with satisfaction (adjusted OR for lower satisfaction 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.39; p <0.001) and perceived efficiency (adjusted OR for lower efficiency 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; p <0.001). Both physicians and nurses preferred to perform ward rounds as part of an interprofessional team. The qualitative analysis of the data revealed a preference for structured interprofessional ward rounds and the active involvement of nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey revealed an overall high preference for interprofessional ward rounds. In addition, we identified several factors that were associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency. Structured in-house protocols for ward rounds may increase the satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional collaboration during ward rounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"4006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing interprofessional ward rounds by identifying factors associated with low satisfaction and efficiency: a quantitative and qualitative national survey of Swiss healthcare professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Armon Arpagaus, Aron Strub, Rahel Kuster, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Flavio Gössi, Eliska Potlukova, Stefano Bassetti, Drahomir Aujesky, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker\",\"doi\":\"10.57187/s.4006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>Interprofessional ward rounds are a cornerstone of patient-centred care for medical inpatients and offer opportunities to discuss and coordinate patient treatment and further management. We aimed to identify factors associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional ward rounds, as reported by physicians and nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous Swiss nationwide online survey of physicians and nurses was conducted in 28 Swiss internal medicine inpatient departments between 9 August and 19 October 2023. Analyses were conducted from November to December 2023. The primary outcome was physicians' and nurses' perceived lower satisfaction with ward rounds, which was assessed using visual analogue scales ranging from 0 to 10, with lower satisfaction defined as scores below the median. The main secondary outcome was perceived lower efficiency using a similar definition. Qualitative analysis was performed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had a response rate of 21.6% (547/2530). Of the 547 physicians and nurses included in the final analysis, the median satisfaction was 7 points (interquartile range [IQR] 6-8). A total of 61% of physicians (156/254) and 76% of nurses (224/293) reported lower satisfaction. Lower satisfaction was reported significantly more frequently by nurses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.43; p ≤0.001) and female team members (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.32-2.9; p <0.01). The median perceived efficiency of ward rounds was 7 points (IQR 5-8), and the nursing profession was associated with lower perceived efficiency (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.3-2.93; p <0.01). Adherence to in-house guidelines for ward rounds was associated with satisfaction (adjusted OR for lower satisfaction 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.39; p <0.001) and perceived efficiency (adjusted OR for lower efficiency 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; p <0.001). Both physicians and nurses preferred to perform ward rounds as part of an interprofessional team. The qualitative analysis of the data revealed a preference for structured interprofessional ward rounds and the active involvement of nurses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey revealed an overall high preference for interprofessional ward rounds. In addition, we identified several factors that were associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency. Structured in-house protocols for ward rounds may increase the satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional collaboration during ward rounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"4006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的:跨专业查房是以患者为中心的住院医疗护理的基石,并提供了讨论和协调患者治疗和进一步管理的机会。我们的目的是确定与医生和护士报告的跨专业查房满意度和效率较低相关的因素。方法:在2023年8月9日至10月19日期间,对瑞士28个内科住院科室的医生和护士进行了一项匿名瑞士全国在线调查。分析于2023年11月至12月进行。主要结果是医生和护士对查房的满意度较低,使用从0到10的视觉模拟量表进行评估,满意度较低定义为得分低于中位数。使用类似的定义,主要的次要结局是感知到较低的效率。通过归纳性专题分析进行定性分析。结果:调查回复率为21.6%(547/2530)。在最终分析的547名医生和护士中,满意度中位数为7分(四分位间距[IQR] 6-8)。共有61%的医生(156/254)和76%的护士(224/293)表示满意度较低。护士更频繁地报告满意度较低(调整优势比[OR] 2.33, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.58-3.43;p≤0.001)和女性团队成员(调整后OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.32-2.9;结论:该调查揭示了对跨专业查房的总体高度偏好。此外,我们还确定了与较低的满意度和效率相关的几个因素。结构化的查房内部协议可以提高查房期间跨专业合作的满意度和效率。
Enhancing interprofessional ward rounds by identifying factors associated with low satisfaction and efficiency: a quantitative and qualitative national survey of Swiss healthcare professionals.
Aims of the study: Interprofessional ward rounds are a cornerstone of patient-centred care for medical inpatients and offer opportunities to discuss and coordinate patient treatment and further management. We aimed to identify factors associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional ward rounds, as reported by physicians and nurses.
Methods: An anonymous Swiss nationwide online survey of physicians and nurses was conducted in 28 Swiss internal medicine inpatient departments between 9 August and 19 October 2023. Analyses were conducted from November to December 2023. The primary outcome was physicians' and nurses' perceived lower satisfaction with ward rounds, which was assessed using visual analogue scales ranging from 0 to 10, with lower satisfaction defined as scores below the median. The main secondary outcome was perceived lower efficiency using a similar definition. Qualitative analysis was performed through inductive thematic analysis.
Results: The survey had a response rate of 21.6% (547/2530). Of the 547 physicians and nurses included in the final analysis, the median satisfaction was 7 points (interquartile range [IQR] 6-8). A total of 61% of physicians (156/254) and 76% of nurses (224/293) reported lower satisfaction. Lower satisfaction was reported significantly more frequently by nurses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.43; p ≤0.001) and female team members (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.32-2.9; p <0.01). The median perceived efficiency of ward rounds was 7 points (IQR 5-8), and the nursing profession was associated with lower perceived efficiency (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.3-2.93; p <0.01). Adherence to in-house guidelines for ward rounds was associated with satisfaction (adjusted OR for lower satisfaction 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.39; p <0.001) and perceived efficiency (adjusted OR for lower efficiency 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; p <0.001). Both physicians and nurses preferred to perform ward rounds as part of an interprofessional team. The qualitative analysis of the data revealed a preference for structured interprofessional ward rounds and the active involvement of nurses.
Conclusions: This survey revealed an overall high preference for interprofessional ward rounds. In addition, we identified several factors that were associated with lower satisfaction and efficiency. Structured in-house protocols for ward rounds may increase the satisfaction and efficiency of interprofessional collaboration during ward rounds.
期刊介绍:
The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.