腰椎微椎间盘切除术后重返工作岗位——一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005258
Mikhail Saltychev, Elias Villikka, Vilma Madekivi, Katri Pernaa, Juhani Juhola
{"title":"腰椎微椎间盘切除术后重返工作岗位——一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev, Elias Villikka, Vilma Madekivi, Katri Pernaa, Juhani Juhola","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate evidence on the prevalence and timeline of RTW after lumbar microdiskectomy.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>While lumbar microdiskectomy is a widely used and well-studied procedure, there is lack of evidence on the postoperative prevalence and schedule of return to work after this type of surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search at Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus and Web of Science. Assessment of risk of systematic bias using Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Adults undergoing lumbar microdiskectomy due to degenerative disc herniation, excluding spinal stenosis, percutaneous diskectomy, artificial disk, arthroplasty, laminectomy, fusion or symptoms of cauda equina.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of identified 2,285 records, 31 were included in meta-analysis. Most of the studies had low risk of systematic bias. Pooling 21 studies, the mean prevalence of postoperative return to work was 78% (95% CI 71% to 83%). Pooling 13 studies the mean time of return to work was 4.79 (95% CI 3.88 to 5.70) weeks. The meta-regression of prevalence of return to work by the duration of follow-up resulted in significant but small coefficient of 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, P=0.006). There was considerable heterogeneity for all three models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this review suggest that approximately 70%-80% of patients who undergo a microsurgical procedure for disc herniation return to work within the first month and a half. It also seems that returning to work after this period is quite unlikely. The duration of preoperative symptoms did not affect significantly the prevalence of RTW. Information about these trends should be taken into account both in the planning phase of the procedure and in setting goals for postoperative rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to work after lumbar microdiskectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Saltychev, Elias Villikka, Vilma Madekivi, Katri Pernaa, Juhani Juhola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate evidence on the prevalence and timeline of RTW after lumbar microdiskectomy.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>While lumbar microdiskectomy is a widely used and well-studied procedure, there is lack of evidence on the postoperative prevalence and schedule of return to work after this type of surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search at Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus and Web of Science. Assessment of risk of systematic bias using Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Adults undergoing lumbar microdiskectomy due to degenerative disc herniation, excluding spinal stenosis, percutaneous diskectomy, artificial disk, arthroplasty, laminectomy, fusion or symptoms of cauda equina.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of identified 2,285 records, 31 were included in meta-analysis. Most of the studies had low risk of systematic bias. Pooling 21 studies, the mean prevalence of postoperative return to work was 78% (95% CI 71% to 83%). Pooling 13 studies the mean time of return to work was 4.79 (95% CI 3.88 to 5.70) weeks. The meta-regression of prevalence of return to work by the duration of follow-up resulted in significant but small coefficient of 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, P=0.006). There was considerable heterogeneity for all three models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this review suggest that approximately 70%-80% of patients who undergo a microsurgical procedure for disc herniation return to work within the first month and a half. It also seems that returning to work after this period is quite unlikely. The duration of preoperative symptoms did not affect significantly the prevalence of RTW. Information about these trends should be taken into account both in the planning phase of the procedure and in setting goals for postoperative rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。目的:探讨腰椎间盘微盘切除术后腰椎间盘挛缩的发生率及时间。背景资料摘要:虽然腰微椎间盘切除术是一种广泛使用且研究充分的手术,但缺乏关于此类手术后患病率和重返工作岗位时间表的证据。方法:在Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus和Web of Science中进行检索。使用预后质量研究(QUIPS)评估系统偏倚风险。随机效应、元分析和元回归。因退行性椎间盘突出而行腰椎微椎间盘切除术的成年人,不包括椎管狭窄、经皮椎间盘切除术、人工椎间盘、关节成形术、椎板切除术、融合或马尾症状。结果:在确定的2285例记录中,31例纳入meta分析。大多数研究的系统性偏倚风险较低。汇总21项研究,术后重返工作岗位的平均患病率为78% (95% CI 71%至83%)。纳入13项研究,平均恢复工作时间为4.79周(95% CI 3.88 ~ 5.70)。复工率随随访时间的元回归结果有显著但较小的系数为0.02 (95% CI 0.01 ~ 0.03, P=0.006)。三种模型均存在相当大的异质性。结论:本综述的结果表明,大约70%-80%接受显微外科手术治疗椎间盘突出的患者在第一个半月内恢复工作。在这段时间之后重返工作岗位似乎也不太可能。术前症状持续时间对RTW患病率无显著影响。在手术的计划阶段和制定术后康复目标时,应考虑到这些趋势的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Return to work after lumbar microdiskectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To investigate evidence on the prevalence and timeline of RTW after lumbar microdiskectomy.

Summary of background data: While lumbar microdiskectomy is a widely used and well-studied procedure, there is lack of evidence on the postoperative prevalence and schedule of return to work after this type of surgery.

Methods: Search at Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus and Web of Science. Assessment of risk of systematic bias using Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Adults undergoing lumbar microdiskectomy due to degenerative disc herniation, excluding spinal stenosis, percutaneous diskectomy, artificial disk, arthroplasty, laminectomy, fusion or symptoms of cauda equina.

Results: Of identified 2,285 records, 31 were included in meta-analysis. Most of the studies had low risk of systematic bias. Pooling 21 studies, the mean prevalence of postoperative return to work was 78% (95% CI 71% to 83%). Pooling 13 studies the mean time of return to work was 4.79 (95% CI 3.88 to 5.70) weeks. The meta-regression of prevalence of return to work by the duration of follow-up resulted in significant but small coefficient of 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, P=0.006). There was considerable heterogeneity for all three models.

Conclusion: The results of this review suggest that approximately 70%-80% of patients who undergo a microsurgical procedure for disc herniation return to work within the first month and a half. It also seems that returning to work after this period is quite unlikely. The duration of preoperative symptoms did not affect significantly the prevalence of RTW. Information about these trends should be taken into account both in the planning phase of the procedure and in setting goals for postoperative rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Morbidly Obese Patients Have Similar Clinical Outcomes and Recovery Kinetics After Minimally Invasive Decompression. Establishing a Benchmark for Iatrogenic Hemodilution and Blood Transfusion in Long-Segment Spine Fusion Surgery. Immediate Postoperative Change in the Upper Instrumented Screw-Vertebra Angle is a Predictor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure. The Impact of the Preoperative Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) Score on Short-Term Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion. Risk Factors of Failed Conservative Treatment for Adjacent Vertebral Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1