双参数磁共振成像鉴别CKD患者肾细胞癌和肾假瘤的诊断工具。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1177/03915603241276738
Himanshu Raj, Hira Lal, Sanchit Rustagi, Arpan Yadav, Uday Pratap Singh, Anil Baid, Sanjoy Kumar Sureka
{"title":"双参数磁共振成像鉴别CKD患者肾细胞癌和肾假瘤的诊断工具。","authors":"Himanshu Raj, Hira Lal, Sanchit Rustagi, Arpan Yadav, Uday Pratap Singh, Anil Baid, Sanjoy Kumar Sureka","doi":"10.1177/03915603241276738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pseudotumors are benign lesions which may mimic like a malignant tumor on conventional imaging. They are formed in kidneys which are scarred and deformed by chronic pyelonephritis, glomerulonephritis, trauma or infarction. There is a diagnostic dilemma in most of the cases as to differentiate RCC and pseudotumors. Our study shows bp-MRI (T2w, DW MRI) can distinguish pseudotumors from RCCs and offers a non-contrast non-invasive alternative in CKD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective evaluation of 80 CKD patients (CKD IV/V), having suspicious renal mass <4 cm on Ultrasound, were subjected to bp-MRI. Two groups were defined on the basis of restriction pattern on DWI. ADC values were calculated. Group I (suspected RCC or malignant tumor) underwent surgical management according to the institutional protocol. Group II (suspected pseudotumor) were subjected to biopsy. ROC curves were drawn to find out area under curve for differentiation of groups and cut-off ADC values calculated so as to achieve highest average sensitivity and specificity. A <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients (Group I) had restricted pattern on DWI imaging whilst 20 had no restriction (Group II), hence ruling out malignancy. It showed a sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity 96.55% in the correct diagnosis. Mean ADC-value for CKD pseudotumors (Group II) was significantly higher than RCCs and surrounding diseased parenchyma (2.20 vs 1.52 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 1.99 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) respectively). ROC analysis for differentiating CKD pseudotumors and RCC yielded high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (99%) for cut-off ADC-value of 1.71 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>bp-MRI is a highly reliable imaging modality for the evaluation of renal lesions. Its ability to accurately differentiate pseudotumors from renal cell carcinomas, even in the absence of contrast administration can be a boon in the diagnostic armamentarium.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241276738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for differentiating RCC and renal pseudotumor in CKD patients.\",\"authors\":\"Himanshu Raj, Hira Lal, Sanchit Rustagi, Arpan Yadav, Uday Pratap Singh, Anil Baid, Sanjoy Kumar Sureka\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241276738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pseudotumors are benign lesions which may mimic like a malignant tumor on conventional imaging. They are formed in kidneys which are scarred and deformed by chronic pyelonephritis, glomerulonephritis, trauma or infarction. There is a diagnostic dilemma in most of the cases as to differentiate RCC and pseudotumors. Our study shows bp-MRI (T2w, DW MRI) can distinguish pseudotumors from RCCs and offers a non-contrast non-invasive alternative in CKD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective evaluation of 80 CKD patients (CKD IV/V), having suspicious renal mass <4 cm on Ultrasound, were subjected to bp-MRI. Two groups were defined on the basis of restriction pattern on DWI. ADC values were calculated. Group I (suspected RCC or malignant tumor) underwent surgical management according to the institutional protocol. Group II (suspected pseudotumor) were subjected to biopsy. ROC curves were drawn to find out area under curve for differentiation of groups and cut-off ADC values calculated so as to achieve highest average sensitivity and specificity. A <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients (Group I) had restricted pattern on DWI imaging whilst 20 had no restriction (Group II), hence ruling out malignancy. It showed a sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity 96.55% in the correct diagnosis. Mean ADC-value for CKD pseudotumors (Group II) was significantly higher than RCCs and surrounding diseased parenchyma (2.20 vs 1.52 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 1.99 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) respectively). ROC analysis for differentiating CKD pseudotumors and RCC yielded high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (99%) for cut-off ADC-value of 1.71 (×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>bp-MRI is a highly reliable imaging modality for the evaluation of renal lesions. Its ability to accurately differentiate pseudotumors from renal cell carcinomas, even in the absence of contrast administration can be a boon in the diagnostic armamentarium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3915603241276738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241276738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241276738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假肿瘤是一种良性病变,在常规影像学上可能与恶性肿瘤相似。它们形成于因慢性肾盂肾炎、肾小球肾炎、外伤或梗塞而结疤或变形的肾脏。在大多数病例中,鉴别RCC和假瘤存在诊断困境。我们的研究表明,bp-MRI (T2w, DW MRI)可以区分假肿瘤和rcc,并为CKD患者提供了一种非对比非侵入性的替代方法。材料与方法:对80例疑似肾肿块的CKD (CKD IV/V)患者进行前瞻性评价。结果:60例患者(I组)DWI成像受限,20例患者(II组)无受限,排除恶性肿瘤。正确诊断的敏感性为81.82%,特异性为96.55%。CKD假肿瘤(II组)的平均adc值显著高于rcc和周围病变实质(2.20 vs 1.52 (×10-3 mm2/s;p - 3mm2 /s;P = 0.0001)。鉴别CKD假肿瘤和RCC的ROC分析显示,截止adc值为1.71 (×10-3 mm2/s),灵敏度(85%)和特异性(99%)很高。结论:bp-MRI是一种高度可靠的评估肾脏病变的成像方式。即使在没有造影剂的情况下,它也能准确地区分假肿瘤和肾细胞癌,这在诊断方面是一个福音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for differentiating RCC and renal pseudotumor in CKD patients.

Introduction: Pseudotumors are benign lesions which may mimic like a malignant tumor on conventional imaging. They are formed in kidneys which are scarred and deformed by chronic pyelonephritis, glomerulonephritis, trauma or infarction. There is a diagnostic dilemma in most of the cases as to differentiate RCC and pseudotumors. Our study shows bp-MRI (T2w, DW MRI) can distinguish pseudotumors from RCCs and offers a non-contrast non-invasive alternative in CKD patients.

Materials and methods: Prospective evaluation of 80 CKD patients (CKD IV/V), having suspicious renal mass <4 cm on Ultrasound, were subjected to bp-MRI. Two groups were defined on the basis of restriction pattern on DWI. ADC values were calculated. Group I (suspected RCC or malignant tumor) underwent surgical management according to the institutional protocol. Group II (suspected pseudotumor) were subjected to biopsy. ROC curves were drawn to find out area under curve for differentiation of groups and cut-off ADC values calculated so as to achieve highest average sensitivity and specificity. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: Sixty patients (Group I) had restricted pattern on DWI imaging whilst 20 had no restriction (Group II), hence ruling out malignancy. It showed a sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity 96.55% in the correct diagnosis. Mean ADC-value for CKD pseudotumors (Group II) was significantly higher than RCCs and surrounding diseased parenchyma (2.20 vs 1.52 (×10-3 mm2/s; p < 0.0001) and 1.99 (×10-3 mm2/s; p = 0.0001) respectively). ROC analysis for differentiating CKD pseudotumors and RCC yielded high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (99%) for cut-off ADC-value of 1.71 (×10-3 mm2/s).

Conclusion: bp-MRI is a highly reliable imaging modality for the evaluation of renal lesions. Its ability to accurately differentiate pseudotumors from renal cell carcinomas, even in the absence of contrast administration can be a boon in the diagnostic armamentarium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Short-term effect of mirabegron on female sexual function in women with overactive bladder. Thanks to reviewers. "Is oral antioxidant (Vit C & E) helpful in minimizing shock wave induced renal damage? A study from a tertiary care Center from eastern India" A prospective study. "To get to know, to discover, to publish-this is the destiny of a scientist" (Froinçois Arago). Exploring the potential of BOLA3-DT as a diagnostic biomarker in prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1