黑人男性结直肠癌筛查决定因素的社会生态学分类:来自混合方法系统评价的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954
P J Zaire, E Miller, A P Ewing, J Hefner, K Wright, L H Smith
{"title":"黑人男性结直肠癌筛查决定因素的社会生态学分类:来自混合方法系统评价的见解。","authors":"P J Zaire, E Miller, A P Ewing, J Hefner, K Wright, L H Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, African/Black American (henceforth Black) men face significantly higher mortality rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to other gender, racial, and ethnic groups. Although CRC is preventable and treatable with early detection, screening rates among Black men remain low. This study aimed to synthesize existing literature on the barriers and facilitators (determinants) of CRC screening to offer guidance to primary care teams in their efforts to improve screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive systematic review of full-text, peer-reviewed studies published in English to explore the various determinants influencing CRC screening among Black men. Using key terms like \"Black or African American,\" \"male,\" and \"colorectal cancer screening,\" we searched databases including PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Embase, published between 2009 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search identified 1235 articles, with 54 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, examining determinants across the socioecological system. Key barriers included a lack of CRC screening knowledge, poor patient-provider communication, lack of access to screening, and medical mistrust stemming from systemic racism. Significant facilitators included aging, receiving a provider recommendation, having social support, and effective culturally appropriate outreach strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key themes and significant findings from the review provide actionable strategies for primary care teams. These include enhancing knowledge about CRC screening within the patient population, improving patient-provider interactions, and reducing barriers to accessing screening. Future research should aim to develop culturally appropriate and collaborative preventive care strategies to improve screening adherence and CRC-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"49 ","pages":"102954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"P J Zaire, E Miller, A P Ewing, J Hefner, K Wright, L H Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, African/Black American (henceforth Black) men face significantly higher mortality rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to other gender, racial, and ethnic groups. Although CRC is preventable and treatable with early detection, screening rates among Black men remain low. This study aimed to synthesize existing literature on the barriers and facilitators (determinants) of CRC screening to offer guidance to primary care teams in their efforts to improve screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive systematic review of full-text, peer-reviewed studies published in English to explore the various determinants influencing CRC screening among Black men. Using key terms like \\\"Black or African American,\\\" \\\"male,\\\" and \\\"colorectal cancer screening,\\\" we searched databases including PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Embase, published between 2009 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search identified 1235 articles, with 54 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, examining determinants across the socioecological system. Key barriers included a lack of CRC screening knowledge, poor patient-provider communication, lack of access to screening, and medical mistrust stemming from systemic racism. Significant facilitators included aging, receiving a provider recommendation, having social support, and effective culturally appropriate outreach strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key themes and significant findings from the review provide actionable strategies for primary care teams. These include enhancing knowledge about CRC screening within the patient population, improving patient-provider interactions, and reducing barriers to accessing screening. Future research should aim to develop culturally appropriate and collaborative preventive care strategies to improve screening adherence and CRC-related outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"102954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,与其他性别、种族和族裔群体相比,非洲裔/黑人(以下简称黑人)男性面临着明显更高的结直肠癌(CRC)死亡率。虽然早期发现可以预防和治疗结直肠癌,但黑人男性的筛查率仍然很低。本研究旨在综合现有文献关于CRC筛查的障碍和促进因素(决定因素),为初级保健团队提高筛查吸收提供指导。方法:我们对发表的英文全文、同行评议的研究进行了全面的系统回顾,以探讨影响黑人男性CRC筛查的各种决定因素。使用“黑人或非裔美国人”、“男性”和“结直肠癌筛查”等关键词,我们检索了2009年至2022年间发表的PubMed、PsychInfo、CINAHL和Embase等数据库。结果:检索到1235篇文章,其中54篇符合纳入标准。大多数研究是横断面的,检查整个社会生态系统的决定因素。主要障碍包括缺乏CRC筛查知识,患者与提供者沟通不良,缺乏筛查机会,以及系统性种族主义造成的医疗不信任。重要的促进因素包括年龄、接受提供者推荐、拥有社会支持和有效的文化上适当的外展策略。结论:综述的关键主题和重要发现为初级保健团队提供了可操作的策略。这些措施包括提高患者群体对结直肠癌筛查的认识,改善患者与提供者的互动,减少获得筛查的障碍。未来的研究应旨在制定文化上合适的协作性预防保健策略,以提高筛查依从性和crc相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.

Background: In the United States, African/Black American (henceforth Black) men face significantly higher mortality rates from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to other gender, racial, and ethnic groups. Although CRC is preventable and treatable with early detection, screening rates among Black men remain low. This study aimed to synthesize existing literature on the barriers and facilitators (determinants) of CRC screening to offer guidance to primary care teams in their efforts to improve screening uptake.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic review of full-text, peer-reviewed studies published in English to explore the various determinants influencing CRC screening among Black men. Using key terms like "Black or African American," "male," and "colorectal cancer screening," we searched databases including PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Embase, published between 2009 and 2022.

Findings: The search identified 1235 articles, with 54 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, examining determinants across the socioecological system. Key barriers included a lack of CRC screening knowledge, poor patient-provider communication, lack of access to screening, and medical mistrust stemming from systemic racism. Significant facilitators included aging, receiving a provider recommendation, having social support, and effective culturally appropriate outreach strategies.

Conclusions: Key themes and significant findings from the review provide actionable strategies for primary care teams. These include enhancing knowledge about CRC screening within the patient population, improving patient-provider interactions, and reducing barriers to accessing screening. Future research should aim to develop culturally appropriate and collaborative preventive care strategies to improve screening adherence and CRC-related outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health over 15 years in Wisconsin, United States. Smoke-free hospitality environments and cognitive health: A population-based study in the United States. The prevalence and burden of musculoskeletal disorders amongst Indigenous people in Pimicikamak, northern Manitoba, Canada: A community health survey. General practitioner-centered rural obesity management: Design, protocol and baseline data of the German HAPpEN pragmatic trial. A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1