Donald R Sullivan, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Anne C Melzer, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Christopher G Slatore
{"title":"一致性和共享肺癌筛查决策与决策冲突的关联:一项多机构横断面分析。","authors":"Donald R Sullivan, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Anne C Melzer, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Christopher G Slatore","doi":"10.1177/23814683241309945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Many organizations recommend structured communication processes, including formal shared decision making (SDM), for patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). We sought to understand if concordant and shared LCS decision making was associated with decisional conflict. <b>Methods.</b> In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients from 3 medical centers (2 Veterans Health Administration, 1 academic facility) after a decision-making interaction about undergoing LCS but before receiving the LDCT. We included patients who indicated they accepted or declined to undergo the LDCT. We evaluated preferred and actual decision-making roles and used multivariable linear and logistic regression models to measure the association of concordant (congruence between actual and preferred roles) and shared LCS decision making with decisional conflict to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR). <b>Results.</b> Of the 409 participants with nonmissing information, 83% reported LCS decision-making role concordance. In addition, 223 (58%) reported an indeterminate level and 56 (14%) reported decisional conflict. LCS decision-making role concordance was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.94, <i>P</i> = 0.71) compared with role discordance. Participant-reported actual LCS SDM role was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.93, <i>P</i> = 0.98) compared with patient- or provider-controlled roles. <b>Conclusions.</b> LCS decisional conflict was uncommon, although many patients reported an indeterminate level of decisional conflict. Neither concordant nor shared LCS decision-making role was associated with decisional conflict. Clinicians may be unable to decrease LCS decisional conflict using efforts to enhance decision-making interactions.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We evaluated patients' preferred and actual decision-making role and decisional conflict following a decision-making interaction about lung cancer screening (LCS).Concordant decision-making preference was not associated with decisional conflict.Actual decision-making role was also not associated with decisional conflict.Efforts to enhance decision-making interactions may not decrease LCS decisional conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"23814683241309945"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Donald R Sullivan, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Anne C Melzer, Santanu Datta, James M Davis, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Christopher G Slatore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683241309945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Many organizations recommend structured communication processes, including formal shared decision making (SDM), for patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). We sought to understand if concordant and shared LCS decision making was associated with decisional conflict. <b>Methods.</b> In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients from 3 medical centers (2 Veterans Health Administration, 1 academic facility) after a decision-making interaction about undergoing LCS but before receiving the LDCT. We included patients who indicated they accepted or declined to undergo the LDCT. We evaluated preferred and actual decision-making roles and used multivariable linear and logistic regression models to measure the association of concordant (congruence between actual and preferred roles) and shared LCS decision making with decisional conflict to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR). <b>Results.</b> Of the 409 participants with nonmissing information, 83% reported LCS decision-making role concordance. In addition, 223 (58%) reported an indeterminate level and 56 (14%) reported decisional conflict. LCS decision-making role concordance was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.94, <i>P</i> = 0.71) compared with role discordance. Participant-reported actual LCS SDM role was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.93, <i>P</i> = 0.98) compared with patient- or provider-controlled roles. <b>Conclusions.</b> LCS decisional conflict was uncommon, although many patients reported an indeterminate level of decisional conflict. Neither concordant nor shared LCS decision-making role was associated with decisional conflict. Clinicians may be unable to decrease LCS decisional conflict using efforts to enhance decision-making interactions.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We evaluated patients' preferred and actual decision-making role and decisional conflict following a decision-making interaction about lung cancer screening (LCS).Concordant decision-making preference was not associated with decisional conflict.Actual decision-making role was also not associated with decisional conflict.Efforts to enhance decision-making interactions may not decrease LCS decisional conflict.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"23814683241309945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241309945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241309945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。许多组织推荐结构化的沟通过程,包括正式的共享决策(SDM),用于使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)进行肺癌筛查(LCS)的患者。我们试图了解和谐和共享的LCS决策是否与决策冲突有关。方法。在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们招募了来自3个医疗中心(2个退伍军人健康管理局,1个学术机构)的患者,这些患者在接受LDCT之前接受了LCS的决策互动。我们纳入了接受或拒绝行LDCT的患者。我们评估了首选决策角色和实际决策角色,并使用多变量线性和逻辑回归模型来测量一致性(实际角色和首选角色之间的一致性)和共享LCS决策与决策冲突的关联,以报告调整优势比(AOR)。结果。在409名信息不缺失的参与者中,83%的人报告了LCS决策角色的一致性。此外,223人(58%)报告了不确定的水平,56人(14%)报告了决策冲突。与角色不一致性相比,LCS决策角色一致性与决策冲突不相关(AOR = 0.86, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.38-1.94, P = 0.71)。与患者或提供者控制的角色相比,参与者报告的实际LCS SDM角色与决策冲突无关(AOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.93, P = 0.98)。结论。LCS决策冲突并不常见,尽管许多患者报告了不确定水平的决策冲突。和谐型和共享型LCS决策角色与决策冲突均不相关。临床医生可能无法通过努力加强决策互动来减少LCS决策冲突。重点:我们评估了患者在肺癌筛查(LCS)决策互动后的首选和实际决策角色以及决策冲突。一致性决策偏好与决策冲突不相关。实际决策角色也与决策冲突无关。加强决策互动的努力可能不会减少LCS决策冲突。
Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Introduction. Many organizations recommend structured communication processes, including formal shared decision making (SDM), for patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). We sought to understand if concordant and shared LCS decision making was associated with decisional conflict. Methods. In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients from 3 medical centers (2 Veterans Health Administration, 1 academic facility) after a decision-making interaction about undergoing LCS but before receiving the LDCT. We included patients who indicated they accepted or declined to undergo the LDCT. We evaluated preferred and actual decision-making roles and used multivariable linear and logistic regression models to measure the association of concordant (congruence between actual and preferred roles) and shared LCS decision making with decisional conflict to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR). Results. Of the 409 participants with nonmissing information, 83% reported LCS decision-making role concordance. In addition, 223 (58%) reported an indeterminate level and 56 (14%) reported decisional conflict. LCS decision-making role concordance was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.94, P = 0.71) compared with role discordance. Participant-reported actual LCS SDM role was not associated with decisional conflict (AOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.93, P = 0.98) compared with patient- or provider-controlled roles. Conclusions. LCS decisional conflict was uncommon, although many patients reported an indeterminate level of decisional conflict. Neither concordant nor shared LCS decision-making role was associated with decisional conflict. Clinicians may be unable to decrease LCS decisional conflict using efforts to enhance decision-making interactions.
Highlights: We evaluated patients' preferred and actual decision-making role and decisional conflict following a decision-making interaction about lung cancer screening (LCS).Concordant decision-making preference was not associated with decisional conflict.Actual decision-making role was also not associated with decisional conflict.Efforts to enhance decision-making interactions may not decrease LCS decisional conflict.