盐酸戊乙基醚:在多种外科手术中预防PONV的一种有前途的抗蛇毒碱药物。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.10.007
Mohamed Abo Zeid, Mohammad El-Nablaway, Amr Elrosasy, Yousef Hawas, Sara Chikh Aissa, Khalid Sarhan, Mariam A Abu Salah, Khalid I AlHussaini, Taisir Saber, Dina M Khodeer, Ahmad Alkheder
{"title":"盐酸戊乙基醚:在多种外科手术中预防PONV的一种有前途的抗蛇毒碱药物。","authors":"Mohamed Abo Zeid, Mohammad El-Nablaway, Amr Elrosasy, Yousef Hawas, Sara Chikh Aissa, Khalid Sarhan, Mariam A Abu Salah, Khalid I AlHussaini, Taisir Saber, Dina M Khodeer, Ahmad Alkheder","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to measure the effectiveness of penehyclidine hydrochloride hydrate (PHC)-an antimuscarinic drug-in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for different surgeries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted an online literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Randomized control trials comparing PHC with placebo or any other standard treatments were included.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our systematic review screened 54 articles, and four randomized control trials with 766 patients were included. There was no significant difference between PHC and the control group for the prevention of postoperative vomiting (risk ratio [RR] = 0.43). However, the subgroup analysis showed some promise. At 24 hours, PHC significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea (RR = 0.31), postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.17), and PONV (RR = 0.33). While at 48 hours, PHC showed nonsignificant results for the same outcomes. PHC did not result in significantly higher rates of analgesia use, headache, dizziness, longer durations of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, or longer duration for extubation, but it showed significantly lower results for the use of antiemetics. Furthermore, PHC showed higher rates of dry mouth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that PHC offers a promising option for PONV prophylaxis, particularly in surgical settings where early PONV are prevalent, with an acceptable safety profile. Further research is recommended to optimize dosing strategies and compare PHC with established antiemetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penehyclidine Hydrochloride: A Promising Antimuscarinic Agent for PONV Prophylaxis in Diverse Surgical Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abo Zeid, Mohammad El-Nablaway, Amr Elrosasy, Yousef Hawas, Sara Chikh Aissa, Khalid Sarhan, Mariam A Abu Salah, Khalid I AlHussaini, Taisir Saber, Dina M Khodeer, Ahmad Alkheder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to measure the effectiveness of penehyclidine hydrochloride hydrate (PHC)-an antimuscarinic drug-in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for different surgeries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted an online literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Randomized control trials comparing PHC with placebo or any other standard treatments were included.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our systematic review screened 54 articles, and four randomized control trials with 766 patients were included. There was no significant difference between PHC and the control group for the prevention of postoperative vomiting (risk ratio [RR] = 0.43). However, the subgroup analysis showed some promise. At 24 hours, PHC significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea (RR = 0.31), postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.17), and PONV (RR = 0.33). While at 48 hours, PHC showed nonsignificant results for the same outcomes. PHC did not result in significantly higher rates of analgesia use, headache, dizziness, longer durations of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, or longer duration for extubation, but it showed significantly lower results for the use of antiemetics. Furthermore, PHC showed higher rates of dry mouth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that PHC offers a promising option for PONV prophylaxis, particularly in surgical settings where early PONV are prevalent, with an acceptable safety profile. Further research is recommended to optimize dosing strategies and compare PHC with established antiemetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.10.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.10.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本meta分析的目的是衡量抗蛇毒碱药物盐酸戊乙基醚(PHC)预防不同手术术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的有效性。设计:荟萃分析。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase数据库进行了在线文献检索。将PHC与安慰剂或任何其他标准治疗进行比较的随机对照试验包括在内。结果:我们的系统综述筛选了54篇文章,纳入了4项随机对照试验,共纳入766例患者。PHC组与对照组在预防术后呕吐方面差异无统计学意义(风险比[RR] = 0.43)。然而,亚组分析显示出一些希望。24小时时,PHC显著降低了术后恶心(RR = 0.31)、术后呕吐(RR = 0.17)和PONV (RR = 0.33)的发生率。而在48小时时,PHC对相同的结果显示无显著结果。PHC并未导致镇痛药使用率、头痛、头晕、麻醉后护理病房停留时间或拔管时间的显著增加,但使用止吐药的结果显著降低。此外,PHC表现出更高的口干率。结论:研究结果表明,PHC为PONV预防提供了一个有希望的选择,特别是在早期PONV流行的外科环境中,具有可接受的安全性。建议进一步研究以优化给药策略,并将PHC与现有止吐药进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Penehyclidine Hydrochloride: A Promising Antimuscarinic Agent for PONV Prophylaxis in Diverse Surgical Procedures.

Purpose: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to measure the effectiveness of penehyclidine hydrochloride hydrate (PHC)-an antimuscarinic drug-in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for different surgeries.

Design: Meta-analysis.

Methods: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted an online literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Randomized control trials comparing PHC with placebo or any other standard treatments were included.

Findings: Our systematic review screened 54 articles, and four randomized control trials with 766 patients were included. There was no significant difference between PHC and the control group for the prevention of postoperative vomiting (risk ratio [RR] = 0.43). However, the subgroup analysis showed some promise. At 24 hours, PHC significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea (RR = 0.31), postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.17), and PONV (RR = 0.33). While at 48 hours, PHC showed nonsignificant results for the same outcomes. PHC did not result in significantly higher rates of analgesia use, headache, dizziness, longer durations of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, or longer duration for extubation, but it showed significantly lower results for the use of antiemetics. Furthermore, PHC showed higher rates of dry mouth.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that PHC offers a promising option for PONV prophylaxis, particularly in surgical settings where early PONV are prevalent, with an acceptable safety profile. Further research is recommended to optimize dosing strategies and compare PHC with established antiemetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Anxiety and Information Needs Among Patients in the Preoperative Holding Area. Implementation of an Evidence-based Protocol to Increase the Use of Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy. Implementation of Perioperative Anesthesia Considerations for Military Veterans Who Consume Cannabis: A Quality Improvement Project. Effect of Magnetic Ball Pressing Combined With TEAS on Postoperative Nausea, Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Postoperative Thirst in Surgical Patients: A Bibliometric Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1