两种方法的评估计数残留白细胞在白细胞诱导的填充红细胞:流式细胞术和全自动细胞计数器。

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_173_23
Mamta Shah, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Sangita Shah, Falguni Pandav, Hetali Shah, Anupa Dixit, Trupti Shetty, Pushkar Admane, Ankur Lath, Prakash Suvasia
{"title":"两种方法的评估计数残留白细胞在白细胞诱导的填充红细胞:流式细胞术和全自动细胞计数器。","authors":"Mamta Shah, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Sangita Shah, Falguni Pandav, Hetali Shah, Anupa Dixit, Trupti Shetty, Pushkar Admane, Ankur Lath, Prakash Suvasia","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_173_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Objective of the study is to explore the possibility of utilization of seven part fully automated hematology analyzer for enumeration of residual leukocytes (residual white blood cells [rWBCs]) in leukoreduced packed red cells (LR-PRCs) prepared from whole blood at a blood center as an alternate to the gold standard method, flow cytometry. In this study, we evaluate the performance characteristic of hematology analyzer against flow cytometry for the estimation of rWBCs in 39 LR-PRC units.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PRCs prepared from whole blood donations by 39 donors were leukoreduced and their volumes were noted. The samples from these LR-PRCs were processed on HORIBA Yumizen H2500 hematology analyzer and Backman Coulter DxFlex (B5R3V5) Flow Cytometer and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 LR-PRCs were analyzed. The average volume of these LR-PRC units was 252 mL ranging from 227 to 285 mL/bag. The average rWBC count for all LR-PRC units as per flowcytometry method was 3.1 × 10<sup>6</sup>/bag. There were 5 LR-PRC units with rWBC count more than 5 × 10<sup>6</sup>/bag which did not fulfill the minimum quality control criteria of LR-PRCs as per the Indian standards (DGHS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new generation fully automated hematology analyzers could be simple, reliable, economical, and practically best method for assessing the efficacy of leukoreduction in LR-PRCs. They can be adopted by resource-constrained blood centers as an alternative to flow cytometry for this purpose. It can be practically applied to check the quality of leukoreduction in all blood component samples before release from blood center for transfusion to the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"18 2","pages":"291-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of two methods for counting residual leukocytes in leukoreduced packed red cells: Flow cytometry and fully automated cell counter.\",\"authors\":\"Mamta Shah, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Sangita Shah, Falguni Pandav, Hetali Shah, Anupa Dixit, Trupti Shetty, Pushkar Admane, Ankur Lath, Prakash Suvasia\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajts.ajts_173_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Objective of the study is to explore the possibility of utilization of seven part fully automated hematology analyzer for enumeration of residual leukocytes (residual white blood cells [rWBCs]) in leukoreduced packed red cells (LR-PRCs) prepared from whole blood at a blood center as an alternate to the gold standard method, flow cytometry. In this study, we evaluate the performance characteristic of hematology analyzer against flow cytometry for the estimation of rWBCs in 39 LR-PRC units.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PRCs prepared from whole blood donations by 39 donors were leukoreduced and their volumes were noted. The samples from these LR-PRCs were processed on HORIBA Yumizen H2500 hematology analyzer and Backman Coulter DxFlex (B5R3V5) Flow Cytometer and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 LR-PRCs were analyzed. The average volume of these LR-PRC units was 252 mL ranging from 227 to 285 mL/bag. The average rWBC count for all LR-PRC units as per flowcytometry method was 3.1 × 10<sup>6</sup>/bag. There were 5 LR-PRC units with rWBC count more than 5 × 10<sup>6</sup>/bag which did not fulfill the minimum quality control criteria of LR-PRCs as per the Indian standards (DGHS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new generation fully automated hematology analyzers could be simple, reliable, economical, and practically best method for assessing the efficacy of leukoreduction in LR-PRCs. They can be adopted by resource-constrained blood centers as an alternative to flow cytometry for this purpose. It can be practically applied to check the quality of leukoreduction in all blood component samples before release from blood center for transfusion to the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"291-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_173_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_173_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究的目的是探索利用七部分全自动血液学分析仪在血液中心制备的白细胞诱导的填充红细胞(lc - prc)中计数残留白细胞(residual white blood cells [rwbc])的可能性,作为金标准方法流式细胞术的替代方法。在这项研究中,我们评估了血液分析仪与流式细胞术的性能特征,以估计39个LR-PRC单位的rwbc。材料和方法:对39例献血者的全血制备的红细胞进行白细胞诱导并记录其体积。用HORIBA Yumizen H2500血液学分析仪和Backman Coulter DxFlex (B5R3V5)流式细胞仪对样品进行比较。结果:共分析了39例lr - prc。这些LR-PRC单位的平均体积为252 mL,范围从227到285 mL/袋。根据流式细胞术方法,所有LR-PRC单位的平均rWBC计数为3.1 × 106/袋。有5个LR-PRC单元rWBC计数大于5 × 106/袋,不符合印度标准(DGHS) LR-PRC的最低质量控制标准。结论:新一代全自动血液学分析仪是一种简便、可靠、经济、实用的评价白细胞减少效果的最佳方法。它们可以被资源有限的血液中心采用,作为此目的的流式细胞术的替代方法。它可以实际应用于从血液中心释放给患者输血前检查所有血液成分样品的白细胞还原质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of two methods for counting residual leukocytes in leukoreduced packed red cells: Flow cytometry and fully automated cell counter.

Background and objectives: Objective of the study is to explore the possibility of utilization of seven part fully automated hematology analyzer for enumeration of residual leukocytes (residual white blood cells [rWBCs]) in leukoreduced packed red cells (LR-PRCs) prepared from whole blood at a blood center as an alternate to the gold standard method, flow cytometry. In this study, we evaluate the performance characteristic of hematology analyzer against flow cytometry for the estimation of rWBCs in 39 LR-PRC units.

Materials and methods: PRCs prepared from whole blood donations by 39 donors were leukoreduced and their volumes were noted. The samples from these LR-PRCs were processed on HORIBA Yumizen H2500 hematology analyzer and Backman Coulter DxFlex (B5R3V5) Flow Cytometer and compared.

Results: A total of 39 LR-PRCs were analyzed. The average volume of these LR-PRC units was 252 mL ranging from 227 to 285 mL/bag. The average rWBC count for all LR-PRC units as per flowcytometry method was 3.1 × 106/bag. There were 5 LR-PRC units with rWBC count more than 5 × 106/bag which did not fulfill the minimum quality control criteria of LR-PRCs as per the Indian standards (DGHS).

Conclusion: The new generation fully automated hematology analyzers could be simple, reliable, economical, and practically best method for assessing the efficacy of leukoreduction in LR-PRCs. They can be adopted by resource-constrained blood centers as an alternative to flow cytometry for this purpose. It can be practically applied to check the quality of leukoreduction in all blood component samples before release from blood center for transfusion to the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serial intrauterine transfusion for severe fetal anemia due to anti-M alloimmunization. Pilot study to understand and compare challenges being faced in reporting of transfusion reactions in various types of blood banks enrolled under Haemovigilance Programme of India. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica: A retrospective study from South India. Serological comparison of weak D versus weakly reacting D by four different methods. Smart approaches for encouraging the blood donation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1