残疾和精神保健服务中的强制措施:西班牙生物伦理和法律视角下的机械限制。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102067
Sergio Ramos-Pozón , Begoña Román-Maestre , Blas Blánquez
{"title":"残疾和精神保健服务中的强制措施:西班牙生物伦理和法律视角下的机械限制。","authors":"Sergio Ramos-Pozón ,&nbsp;Begoña Román-Maestre ,&nbsp;Blas Blánquez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the use of coercive measures, particularly mechanical and pharmacological restraints, in disability care settings and mental health services from a bioethical perspective, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorder, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorders. A robust bioethical framework is presented, advocating for principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, dignity, dialogical justice, distributive justice, and vulnerability. These principles are integrated to reframe interventions and promote respect for patient rights. The article provides a detailed account of the legal framework governing these practices in Spain, addressing both national and regional legislation, and emphasizing its significance in protecting human rights. Finally, practical recommendations are offered, which have proven effective in significantly reducing the need for coercive interventions. The article concludes by advocating for a transformation in clinical practices, promoting dignified and respectful care in line with a human rights framework, and moving away from unnecessary coercive measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Ramos-Pozón ,&nbsp;Begoña Román-Maestre ,&nbsp;Blas Blánquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article explores the use of coercive measures, particularly mechanical and pharmacological restraints, in disability care settings and mental health services from a bioethical perspective, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorder, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorders. A robust bioethical framework is presented, advocating for principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, dignity, dialogical justice, distributive justice, and vulnerability. These principles are integrated to reframe interventions and promote respect for patient rights. The article provides a detailed account of the legal framework governing these practices in Spain, addressing both national and regional legislation, and emphasizing its significance in protecting human rights. Finally, practical recommendations are offered, which have proven effective in significantly reducing the need for coercive interventions. The article concludes by advocating for a transformation in clinical practices, promoting dignified and respectful care in line with a human rights framework, and moving away from unnecessary coercive measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272400116X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272400116X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从生物伦理的角度探讨了在残疾护理机构和精神卫生服务中使用强制措施,特别是机械和药物限制的情况,重点是这些做法如何影响精神障碍患者的人权,重点是这些做法如何影响精神障碍患者的人权。提出了一个强有力的生物伦理框架,倡导自主、仁慈、非恶意、尊严、对话正义、分配正义和脆弱性的原则。将这些原则整合起来,重新制定干预措施并促进对患者权利的尊重。该条详细说明了西班牙管理这些做法的法律框架,涉及国家和区域立法,并强调其在保护人权方面的重要性。最后,提出了实际的建议,这些建议已被证明有效地大大减少了对强制性干预的需要。文章的结论是倡导临床实践的转变,促进符合人权框架的有尊严和尊重的护理,并避免不必要的强制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain
This article explores the use of coercive measures, particularly mechanical and pharmacological restraints, in disability care settings and mental health services from a bioethical perspective, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorder, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorders. A robust bioethical framework is presented, advocating for principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, dignity, dialogical justice, distributive justice, and vulnerability. These principles are integrated to reframe interventions and promote respect for patient rights. The article provides a detailed account of the legal framework governing these practices in Spain, addressing both national and regional legislation, and emphasizing its significance in protecting human rights. Finally, practical recommendations are offered, which have proven effective in significantly reducing the need for coercive interventions. The article concludes by advocating for a transformation in clinical practices, promoting dignified and respectful care in line with a human rights framework, and moving away from unnecessary coercive measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
‘If someone had stopped to talk to me’: A human rights analysis of Spain's mental health system Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization Editorial Board The use of community treatment orders in people with substance induced psychosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1