步兵训练的结果:他们是否改善了最初的载重重量的减少和额外的冲刺强度运动?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bmj Military Health Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1136/military-2024-002765
Herbert Groeller, P Larsen, J R Drain, N Gibson, M Kitcher, L Alfiero, B J Dascombe, J A Sampson
{"title":"步兵训练的结果:他们是否改善了最初的载重重量的减少和额外的冲刺强度运动?","authors":"Herbert Groeller, P Larsen, J R Drain, N Gibson, M Kitcher, L Alfiero, B J Dascombe, J A Sampson","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infantry is a physically demanding trade that is associated with elevated rates of musculoskeletal injury. A 17-week longitudinal intervention assessed the effect of a progressive increase in load carriage mass and sprint-intensity intervals on physical performance, physical complaints, medical encounters, physical activity and sleep in infantry trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>91 infantry trainees from 2 separate platoons, randomly assigned as control (CON) or experimental (EXP), provided written voluntary consent. Both completed a 17-week training syllabus that included physical training and military education lessons. Compared with CON, EXP completed a modified regimen that included; a 25%-30% reduction in load carriage mass (weeks 1-4), sprint (weeks 1-7) and 3 min running intervals. Endurance, strength, power and functional performance were assessed (weeks 1, 6-8), physical activity and sleep were recorded using actigraphy (each day of training, weeks 1-17), with daily physical complaints tabulated (weeks 1-7) and frequency of medical encounters retrospectively extracted from defence health records (weeks 1-17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On-time completion of training was attained in 93% and 79% of CON and EXP, respectively. Total load carriage mass (weeks 1-4) was 27% lower in EXP (10.1 kg/hour) than CON (13.9 kg/hour). Push-up repetitions in CON (5 reps) improved compared with EXP, with functional performance improving markedly in both groups (71 m, 23%). All other fitness assessments were similar between groups. No difference in sleep quality and quantity was observed between groups, with 77% and 16% of trainees sleeping <7 hours (suboptimal) and <6 hours (sleep restricted) per night, respectively. Physical complaints in CON were higher (62), despite no difference observed in medical encounters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction in load carriage mass and inclusion of sprint interval training did not modify the adaptative or maladaptive responses to infantry training. Most trainees experienced chronic suboptimal sleep quantity and quality with over 15% classified as sleep restricted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infantry training outcomes: are they improved with an initial reduction in load carriage mass and additional sprint intensity exercise?\",\"authors\":\"Herbert Groeller, P Larsen, J R Drain, N Gibson, M Kitcher, L Alfiero, B J Dascombe, J A Sampson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2024-002765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infantry is a physically demanding trade that is associated with elevated rates of musculoskeletal injury. A 17-week longitudinal intervention assessed the effect of a progressive increase in load carriage mass and sprint-intensity intervals on physical performance, physical complaints, medical encounters, physical activity and sleep in infantry trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>91 infantry trainees from 2 separate platoons, randomly assigned as control (CON) or experimental (EXP), provided written voluntary consent. Both completed a 17-week training syllabus that included physical training and military education lessons. Compared with CON, EXP completed a modified regimen that included; a 25%-30% reduction in load carriage mass (weeks 1-4), sprint (weeks 1-7) and 3 min running intervals. Endurance, strength, power and functional performance were assessed (weeks 1, 6-8), physical activity and sleep were recorded using actigraphy (each day of training, weeks 1-17), with daily physical complaints tabulated (weeks 1-7) and frequency of medical encounters retrospectively extracted from defence health records (weeks 1-17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On-time completion of training was attained in 93% and 79% of CON and EXP, respectively. Total load carriage mass (weeks 1-4) was 27% lower in EXP (10.1 kg/hour) than CON (13.9 kg/hour). Push-up repetitions in CON (5 reps) improved compared with EXP, with functional performance improving markedly in both groups (71 m, 23%). All other fitness assessments were similar between groups. No difference in sleep quality and quantity was observed between groups, with 77% and 16% of trainees sleeping <7 hours (suboptimal) and <6 hours (sleep restricted) per night, respectively. Physical complaints in CON were higher (62), despite no difference observed in medical encounters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction in load carriage mass and inclusion of sprint interval training did not modify the adaptative or maladaptive responses to infantry training. Most trainees experienced chronic suboptimal sleep quantity and quality with over 15% classified as sleep restricted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步兵是一种体力要求很高的职业,与肌肉骨骼损伤的高发率有关。一项为期17周的纵向干预评估了逐步增加负重质量和冲刺强度间隔对步兵受训人员的身体表现、身体不适、医疗遭遇、身体活动和睡眠的影响。方法:91名来自2个排的步兵学员,随机分为对照组(CON)和实验组(EXP),均提供书面自愿同意书。两人都完成了为期17周的训练大纲,包括体能训练和军事教育课程。与对照组相比,实验组完成的改良方案包括;减少25%-30%的载重量(1-4周),短跑(1-7周)和3分钟的跑步间隔。对耐力、力量、力量和功能表现进行评估(第1周、第6周至第8周),使用活动记录仪记录体力活动和睡眠(第1周至第17周,每天训练),将每日身体不适情况列成表格(第1周至第7周),并从防务健康记录(第1周至第17周)中回顾性提取就诊频率。结果:CON和EXP的准时完成率分别为93%和79%。总载重运输质量(第1-4周)EXP (10.1 kg/小时)比CON (13.9 kg/小时)低27%。对照组俯卧撑重复数(5次)较对照组有所提高,两组的功能表现均有显著提高(71米,23%)。所有其他健康评估在两组之间相似。两组之间的睡眠质量和睡眠量没有差异,分别有77%和16%的受训者睡眠。结论:负重重量的减少和短跑间歇训练的加入并没有改变步兵训练的适应或不适应反应。大多数受训者经历了长期的睡眠量和质量欠佳,超过15%的人被归类为睡眠受限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infantry training outcomes: are they improved with an initial reduction in load carriage mass and additional sprint intensity exercise?

Introduction: Infantry is a physically demanding trade that is associated with elevated rates of musculoskeletal injury. A 17-week longitudinal intervention assessed the effect of a progressive increase in load carriage mass and sprint-intensity intervals on physical performance, physical complaints, medical encounters, physical activity and sleep in infantry trainees.

Methods: 91 infantry trainees from 2 separate platoons, randomly assigned as control (CON) or experimental (EXP), provided written voluntary consent. Both completed a 17-week training syllabus that included physical training and military education lessons. Compared with CON, EXP completed a modified regimen that included; a 25%-30% reduction in load carriage mass (weeks 1-4), sprint (weeks 1-7) and 3 min running intervals. Endurance, strength, power and functional performance were assessed (weeks 1, 6-8), physical activity and sleep were recorded using actigraphy (each day of training, weeks 1-17), with daily physical complaints tabulated (weeks 1-7) and frequency of medical encounters retrospectively extracted from defence health records (weeks 1-17).

Results: On-time completion of training was attained in 93% and 79% of CON and EXP, respectively. Total load carriage mass (weeks 1-4) was 27% lower in EXP (10.1 kg/hour) than CON (13.9 kg/hour). Push-up repetitions in CON (5 reps) improved compared with EXP, with functional performance improving markedly in both groups (71 m, 23%). All other fitness assessments were similar between groups. No difference in sleep quality and quantity was observed between groups, with 77% and 16% of trainees sleeping <7 hours (suboptimal) and <6 hours (sleep restricted) per night, respectively. Physical complaints in CON were higher (62), despite no difference observed in medical encounters.

Conclusions: The reduction in load carriage mass and inclusion of sprint interval training did not modify the adaptative or maladaptive responses to infantry training. Most trainees experienced chronic suboptimal sleep quantity and quality with over 15% classified as sleep restricted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
期刊最新文献
Moral injury and quality of life among military veterans. Military concerns for chronic pain stimulator devices. Haemostatic resuscitation in practice: a descriptive analysis of blood products administered during Operation HERRICK, Afghanistan. Evaluation of the NHS England 'Op COURAGE' High Intensity Service for military veterans with significant mental health problems. Courage, camaraderie and compassion: a qualitative exploration into UK military veterans' experiences of self-compassion within the context of alcohol use disorders and recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1