跨性别个体性别确认护理的支付和政策障碍:一项定性研究和政策评估。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117666
Alexa B. D'Angelo , Michelle Dearolf , Arjee Restar , Emma K. Tsui , Naomi Zewde , Christian Grov
{"title":"跨性别个体性别确认护理的支付和政策障碍:一项定性研究和政策评估。","authors":"Alexa B. D'Angelo ,&nbsp;Michelle Dearolf ,&nbsp;Arjee Restar ,&nbsp;Emma K. Tsui ,&nbsp;Naomi Zewde ,&nbsp;Christian Grov","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past decade, access to and insurance coverage for gender-affirming medical and surgical treatment for transgender (trans) individuals in the U.S. has improved. Despite this, trans individuals continue to experience insurance-related barriers to gender-affirming care (GAC)—and in particular, transmasculine individuals may face gender-specific barriers resulting from regulations on masculinizing hormones. In this study, we interviewed transmasculine individuals from across the U.S. about their gender-affirming care experiences with a focus on insurance, payment and policy-related barriers to care. Interviews were conducted via video-conferencing software, analyzed using a codebook approach to thematic analysis, and contextualized within a broader analysis of the policy landscape dictating coverage for gender-affirming care. Participants reported insurance denials for gender-affirming care, as well as challenges with prior-authorization requirements, letter requirements, restrictive formulary lists and other challenges that complicated and/or barred access to care. Many discussed adaptive strategies to these challenges, which included utilizing community resources and knowledge, as well as receiving material support from family, friends, and partners, and developing technical and interpersonal savvy skills in response to insurance challenges. Participants expressed a range of emotional responses with regard to payment and related challenges, from annoyance and frustration to hopelessness. Our findings illuminate the persisting challenges that transmasculine individuals face when attempting to access and pay for gender-affirming care, despite improvements in insurance coverage and legal protections in recent years resulting from the <em>Bostock</em> ruling by the Supreme Court and the expansion of the ACA’s Section 1557.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating payment and policy barriers to gender-affirming care for transmasculine individuals: A qualitative study and policy assessment\",\"authors\":\"Alexa B. D'Angelo ,&nbsp;Michelle Dearolf ,&nbsp;Arjee Restar ,&nbsp;Emma K. Tsui ,&nbsp;Naomi Zewde ,&nbsp;Christian Grov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over the past decade, access to and insurance coverage for gender-affirming medical and surgical treatment for transgender (trans) individuals in the U.S. has improved. Despite this, trans individuals continue to experience insurance-related barriers to gender-affirming care (GAC)—and in particular, transmasculine individuals may face gender-specific barriers resulting from regulations on masculinizing hormones. In this study, we interviewed transmasculine individuals from across the U.S. about their gender-affirming care experiences with a focus on insurance, payment and policy-related barriers to care. Interviews were conducted via video-conferencing software, analyzed using a codebook approach to thematic analysis, and contextualized within a broader analysis of the policy landscape dictating coverage for gender-affirming care. Participants reported insurance denials for gender-affirming care, as well as challenges with prior-authorization requirements, letter requirements, restrictive formulary lists and other challenges that complicated and/or barred access to care. Many discussed adaptive strategies to these challenges, which included utilizing community resources and knowledge, as well as receiving material support from family, friends, and partners, and developing technical and interpersonal savvy skills in response to insurance challenges. Participants expressed a range of emotional responses with regard to payment and related challenges, from annoyance and frustration to hopelessness. Our findings illuminate the persisting challenges that transmasculine individuals face when attempting to access and pay for gender-affirming care, despite improvements in insurance coverage and legal protections in recent years resulting from the <em>Bostock</em> ruling by the Supreme Court and the expansion of the ACA’s Section 1557.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"366 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,美国变性人(trans)获得性别确认医疗和手术治疗的机会和保险范围有所改善。尽管如此,跨性别者在获得性别确认护理(GAC)时仍然会遇到与保险相关的障碍,尤其是跨性别者,他们可能会因为男性化激素的规定而面临性别障碍。在这项研究中,我们采访了来自美国各地的跨性别个体,了解他们的性别肯定护理经历,重点关注保险、支付和政策相关的护理障碍。访谈是通过视频会议软件进行的,使用主题分析的代码本方法进行分析,并在对确定性别肯定护理覆盖面的政策格局进行更广泛分析的背景下进行分析。参与者报告了性别确认护理的保险拒绝,以及事先授权要求、信函要求、限制性处方清单和其他挑战,这些挑战使获得护理变得复杂和/或受阻。许多人讨论了应对这些挑战的适应性策略,其中包括利用社区资源和知识,以及从家庭、朋友和合作伙伴那里获得物质支持,以及发展应对保险挑战的技术和人际交往能力。参与者对支付和相关挑战表达了一系列情绪反应,从烦恼、沮丧到绝望。我们的研究结果表明,尽管近年来由于最高法院的博斯托克裁决和ACA第1557节的扩大,保险覆盖面和法律保护有所改善,但跨性别者在试图获得和支付性别确认护理时仍面临持续的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating payment and policy barriers to gender-affirming care for transmasculine individuals: A qualitative study and policy assessment
Over the past decade, access to and insurance coverage for gender-affirming medical and surgical treatment for transgender (trans) individuals in the U.S. has improved. Despite this, trans individuals continue to experience insurance-related barriers to gender-affirming care (GAC)—and in particular, transmasculine individuals may face gender-specific barriers resulting from regulations on masculinizing hormones. In this study, we interviewed transmasculine individuals from across the U.S. about their gender-affirming care experiences with a focus on insurance, payment and policy-related barriers to care. Interviews were conducted via video-conferencing software, analyzed using a codebook approach to thematic analysis, and contextualized within a broader analysis of the policy landscape dictating coverage for gender-affirming care. Participants reported insurance denials for gender-affirming care, as well as challenges with prior-authorization requirements, letter requirements, restrictive formulary lists and other challenges that complicated and/or barred access to care. Many discussed adaptive strategies to these challenges, which included utilizing community resources and knowledge, as well as receiving material support from family, friends, and partners, and developing technical and interpersonal savvy skills in response to insurance challenges. Participants expressed a range of emotional responses with regard to payment and related challenges, from annoyance and frustration to hopelessness. Our findings illuminate the persisting challenges that transmasculine individuals face when attempting to access and pay for gender-affirming care, despite improvements in insurance coverage and legal protections in recent years resulting from the Bostock ruling by the Supreme Court and the expansion of the ACA’s Section 1557.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Relatively independent and complementary roles of family history and polygenic risk score in age at onset and incident cases of 12 common diseases Changes in marital and health status as risk factors for a subsequent negative wealth shock: A population-based longitudinal study in the United States, 1995–2020 Testing “the science”: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 testing policy across four Canadian provinces Using spatial Bayesian models to estimate associations between structural racial discrimination and disparities in severe maternal morbidity Exploring the drivers of unsustainable pressures in health and social care: A qualitative system dynamics approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1