注意抑制能力预测挑战性听觉流中的神经表征。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01260-2
Joan Belo, Maureen Clerc, Daniele Schon
{"title":"注意抑制能力预测挑战性听觉流中的神经表征。","authors":"Joan Belo, Maureen Clerc, Daniele Schon","doi":"10.3758/s13415-024-01260-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Focusing on a single source within a complex auditory scene is challenging. M/EEG-based auditory attention detection (AAD) allows to detect which stream an individual is attending to within a set of multiple concurrent streams. The high interindividual variability in the auditory attention detection performance often is attributed to physiological factors and signal-to-noise ratio of neural data. We hypothesize that executive functions-in particular sustained attention, working memory, and attentional inhibition-may partly explain the variability in auditory attention detection performance, because they support the cognitive processes required when listening to complex auditory scenes. We chose a particularly challenging auditory scene by presenting dichotically polyphonic classical piano excerpts that lasted 1 min each. Two different excerpts were presented simultaneously, one in each ear. Forty-one participants, with different degrees of musical expertise, listened to these complex auditory scenes focusing on one ear while we recorded the EEG. Participants also completed several tasks assessing executive functions. As expected, EEG-based auditory attention detection was greater for attended than unattended stimuli. Importantly, attentional inhibition ability did explain 6% of the reconstruction accuracy and 8% of the classification accuracy. No other executive function was a significant predictor of reconstruction or classification accuracies. No clear effect of musical expertise was found on reconstruction and classification performance. In conclusion, cognitive factors seem to impact the robustness of the neural auditory representation and hence the performance of EEG-based decoding approaches. Taking advantage of this relation could be useful to improve next-generation hearing aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attentional Inhibition Ability Predicts Neural Representation During Challenging Auditory Streaming.\",\"authors\":\"Joan Belo, Maureen Clerc, Daniele Schon\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-024-01260-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Focusing on a single source within a complex auditory scene is challenging. M/EEG-based auditory attention detection (AAD) allows to detect which stream an individual is attending to within a set of multiple concurrent streams. The high interindividual variability in the auditory attention detection performance often is attributed to physiological factors and signal-to-noise ratio of neural data. We hypothesize that executive functions-in particular sustained attention, working memory, and attentional inhibition-may partly explain the variability in auditory attention detection performance, because they support the cognitive processes required when listening to complex auditory scenes. We chose a particularly challenging auditory scene by presenting dichotically polyphonic classical piano excerpts that lasted 1 min each. Two different excerpts were presented simultaneously, one in each ear. Forty-one participants, with different degrees of musical expertise, listened to these complex auditory scenes focusing on one ear while we recorded the EEG. Participants also completed several tasks assessing executive functions. As expected, EEG-based auditory attention detection was greater for attended than unattended stimuli. Importantly, attentional inhibition ability did explain 6% of the reconstruction accuracy and 8% of the classification accuracy. No other executive function was a significant predictor of reconstruction or classification accuracies. No clear effect of musical expertise was found on reconstruction and classification performance. In conclusion, cognitive factors seem to impact the robustness of the neural auditory representation and hence the performance of EEG-based decoding approaches. Taking advantage of this relation could be useful to improve next-generation hearing aids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01260-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01260-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专注于一个复杂的听觉场景中的单一来源是具有挑战性的。基于M/ eeg的听觉注意检测(AAD)允许在一组多个并发流中检测个人正在关注的流。听觉注意检测表现的高个体间差异通常归因于生理因素和神经数据的信噪比。我们假设执行功能——特别是持续注意、工作记忆和注意抑制——可能部分解释了听觉注意检测表现的变异性,因为它们支持在听复杂听觉场景时所需的认知过程。我们选择了一个特别具有挑战性的听觉场景,通过呈现两个复调的古典钢琴片段,每个片段持续1分钟。同时播放两段不同的节选,每只耳朵各放一段。在我们记录脑电图的同时,41名具有不同程度音乐专业知识的参与者集中在一只耳朵上听这些复杂的听觉场景。参与者还完成了几项评估执行功能的任务。正如预期的那样,基于脑电图的听觉注意检测对有注意刺激比无注意刺激更有效。重要的是,注意抑制能力确实解释了6%的重建准确率和8%的分类准确率。没有其他执行功能是重建或分类准确性的重要预测因子。音乐专长对重建和分类表现没有明显的影响。总之,认知因素似乎会影响神经听觉表征的稳健性,从而影响基于脑电图的解码方法的性能。利用这种关系有助于改进下一代助听器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attentional Inhibition Ability Predicts Neural Representation During Challenging Auditory Streaming.

Focusing on a single source within a complex auditory scene is challenging. M/EEG-based auditory attention detection (AAD) allows to detect which stream an individual is attending to within a set of multiple concurrent streams. The high interindividual variability in the auditory attention detection performance often is attributed to physiological factors and signal-to-noise ratio of neural data. We hypothesize that executive functions-in particular sustained attention, working memory, and attentional inhibition-may partly explain the variability in auditory attention detection performance, because they support the cognitive processes required when listening to complex auditory scenes. We chose a particularly challenging auditory scene by presenting dichotically polyphonic classical piano excerpts that lasted 1 min each. Two different excerpts were presented simultaneously, one in each ear. Forty-one participants, with different degrees of musical expertise, listened to these complex auditory scenes focusing on one ear while we recorded the EEG. Participants also completed several tasks assessing executive functions. As expected, EEG-based auditory attention detection was greater for attended than unattended stimuli. Importantly, attentional inhibition ability did explain 6% of the reconstruction accuracy and 8% of the classification accuracy. No other executive function was a significant predictor of reconstruction or classification accuracies. No clear effect of musical expertise was found on reconstruction and classification performance. In conclusion, cognitive factors seem to impact the robustness of the neural auditory representation and hence the performance of EEG-based decoding approaches. Taking advantage of this relation could be useful to improve next-generation hearing aids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions. Low emotional contagious behavior induces PTSD susceptibility in observers and is related to the regulation of oxytocin receptor in mice. The influence of social status and promise levels in trust games: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study. Correction: The two sides of Phobos: Gray and white matter abnormalities in phobic individuals. Attentional Inhibition Ability Predicts Neural Representation During Challenging Auditory Streaming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1