2021年美国成人糖尿病患病率的城乡差异。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventing Chronic Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.5888/pcd22.240199
Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang
{"title":"2021年美国成人糖尿病患病率的城乡差异。","authors":"Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang","doi":"10.5888/pcd22.240199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"E05"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5888/pcd22.240199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"E05\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.240199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.240199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们评估了美国农村和城市地区成人糖尿病患病率的州级差异。方法:我们使用来自2021年行为风险因素监测系统的适用数据估计了41个州农村和城市地区的州特异性糖尿病患病率。农村地区定义依据2013年国家卫生统计中心城乡分类方案。我们通过对社会人口特征和肥胖状况进行调整的逻辑回归,估计了每个州农村与城市地区的糖尿病优势比(ORs)。分析于2023年进行。结果:农村地区糖尿病患病率为14.3%,从科罗拉多州的8.4%到北卡罗来纳州的21.3%不等。在城市地区,患病率为11.2%,从科罗拉多州的6.9%到西弗吉尼亚州的15.5%不等。在19个州,农村与城市地区未调整的糖尿病or值显著(P < 0.05)且大于1。在调整了年龄、性别、种族和民族因素后,7个州(佛罗里达州、伊利诺伊州、肯塔基州、马里兰州、北卡罗来纳州、俄勒冈州和弗吉尼亚州)的ORs显著大于1。在对教育、收入和肥胖状况进行额外调整后,农村地区与城市地区的糖尿病or仍然显著,两个州(北卡罗来纳和俄勒冈州)的or大于1。结论:我们的研究结果揭示了19个州农村和城市地区糖尿病患病率的显著地理差异。大多数州的差异可以用社会人口特征和肥胖率的城乡差异来解释。我们的研究结果可以为决策者提供信息,以确定减少各州城乡差距的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021.

Introduction: We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States.

Methods: We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023.

Results: In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon).

Conclusion: Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing Chronic Disease
Preventing Chronic Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Depression and Incident Hypertension: The Strong Heart Family Study. Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021. Interests and Preferences in Programs to Improve Health Among Men With or at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups, 2019. Food Policy Councils and Healthy Food Access Policies: A 2021 National Survey of Community Policy Supports. Chronic Disease Management of Early Childhood Dental Caries: Practices of US Pediatric Dentists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1