制定,实施和评估澳大利亚第一个国家记忆和认知临床指南。

IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/trc2.70031
Inga Mehrani, Matthew Paradise, Lee-Fay Low, Sue Kurrle, Valerie Arsenova, Gemma Jahn, Katrina Fyfe, Johannes C Michaelian, Katharine Salmon, Jane Alty, Sharon L Naismith, Perminder S Sachdev
{"title":"制定,实施和评估澳大利亚第一个国家记忆和认知临床指南。","authors":"Inga Mehrani, Matthew Paradise, Lee-Fay Low, Sue Kurrle, Valerie Arsenova, Gemma Jahn, Katrina Fyfe, Johannes C Michaelian, Katharine Salmon, Jane Alty, Sharon L Naismith, Perminder S Sachdev","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A lack of national consensus on the roles and responsibilities of Australian memory and cognition clinics contributes to the large variability seen across services. The introduction of guidelines and a quality assessment framework could facilitate greater harmonization and quality improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi process to develop the guidelines. Pilot clinics completed a self-assessment, case-note audit, and review meeting to evaluate their service against the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final guidelines included 160 standards on 14 different topics. Standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care responsibilities were particularly controversial. Seven clinics participated in the pilot. On average, clinics achieved 56% of standards (range of 18% to 87%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Memory and Cognition Clinic Guidelines form the first step toward greater harmonization and quality improvements. Key learnings from the clinics' feedback included reducing the number of secondary standards and streamlining data collection with the national dementia clinical quality registry.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We developed and implemented the first national consensus-based best-practice guidelines for memory and cognition clinics in Australia.The guidelines are based on consultation with 125 Australian health professionals and 89 Australians living with dementia and care partners.First-time national agreement on standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care requirements is presented in the guidelines.The guidelines were implemented in seven memory and cognition clinics from five different states.Clinicians' feedback included: reducing the number of secondary standards to increase conciseness and practicability should be considered for future iterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing, implementing, and evaluating the first national Memory and Cognition Clinic Guidelines in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Inga Mehrani, Matthew Paradise, Lee-Fay Low, Sue Kurrle, Valerie Arsenova, Gemma Jahn, Katrina Fyfe, Johannes C Michaelian, Katharine Salmon, Jane Alty, Sharon L Naismith, Perminder S Sachdev\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/trc2.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A lack of national consensus on the roles and responsibilities of Australian memory and cognition clinics contributes to the large variability seen across services. The introduction of guidelines and a quality assessment framework could facilitate greater harmonization and quality improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi process to develop the guidelines. Pilot clinics completed a self-assessment, case-note audit, and review meeting to evaluate their service against the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final guidelines included 160 standards on 14 different topics. Standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care responsibilities were particularly controversial. Seven clinics participated in the pilot. On average, clinics achieved 56% of standards (range of 18% to 87%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Memory and Cognition Clinic Guidelines form the first step toward greater harmonization and quality improvements. Key learnings from the clinics' feedback included reducing the number of secondary standards and streamlining data collection with the national dementia clinical quality registry.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We developed and implemented the first national consensus-based best-practice guidelines for memory and cognition clinics in Australia.The guidelines are based on consultation with 125 Australian health professionals and 89 Australians living with dementia and care partners.First-time national agreement on standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care requirements is presented in the guidelines.The guidelines were implemented in seven memory and cognition clinics from five different states.Clinicians' feedback included: reducing the number of secondary standards to increase conciseness and practicability should be considered for future iterations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e70031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:澳大利亚记忆和认知诊所的角色和责任缺乏全国共识,导致各服务机构的差异很大。采用准则和质量评估框架可以促进更大程度的协调和质量改进。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法制定指南。试点诊所完成了自我评估、病例记录审计和审查会议,以根据指南评估其服务。结果:最终指南包括14个不同主题的160个标准。关于评估的最长等待时间和最低诊断后护理责任的标准尤其有争议。七家诊所参与了试点。平均而言,诊所达到了56%的标准(范围为18%至87%)。讨论:记忆与认知临床指南是迈向更大协调和质量改进的第一步。从这些诊所的反馈中得到的主要教训包括减少二级标准的数量,以及通过国家痴呆症临床质量登记处简化数据收集。重点:我们为澳大利亚的记忆和认知诊所制定并实施了第一个基于全国共识的最佳实践指南。该指南是在咨询了125名澳大利亚卫生专业人员和89名患有痴呆症的澳大利亚人及其护理伙伴之后制定的。指南中首次提出了关于评估的最长等待时间和最低诊断后护理要求的标准的国家协议。该指南在来自五个不同州的七个记忆和认知诊所实施。临床医生的反馈包括:应考虑减少二级标准的数量以增加简洁性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing, implementing, and evaluating the first national Memory and Cognition Clinic Guidelines in Australia.

Introduction: A lack of national consensus on the roles and responsibilities of Australian memory and cognition clinics contributes to the large variability seen across services. The introduction of guidelines and a quality assessment framework could facilitate greater harmonization and quality improvements.

Methods: We used a modified Delphi process to develop the guidelines. Pilot clinics completed a self-assessment, case-note audit, and review meeting to evaluate their service against the guidelines.

Results: The final guidelines included 160 standards on 14 different topics. Standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care responsibilities were particularly controversial. Seven clinics participated in the pilot. On average, clinics achieved 56% of standards (range of 18% to 87%).

Discussion: The Memory and Cognition Clinic Guidelines form the first step toward greater harmonization and quality improvements. Key learnings from the clinics' feedback included reducing the number of secondary standards and streamlining data collection with the national dementia clinical quality registry.

Highlights: We developed and implemented the first national consensus-based best-practice guidelines for memory and cognition clinics in Australia.The guidelines are based on consultation with 125 Australian health professionals and 89 Australians living with dementia and care partners.First-time national agreement on standards around maximum waiting times for an assessment and minimum post-diagnostic care requirements is presented in the guidelines.The guidelines were implemented in seven memory and cognition clinics from five different states.Clinicians' feedback included: reducing the number of secondary standards to increase conciseness and practicability should be considered for future iterations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review. Perspective: Minimally clinically important "symptomatic" benefit associated with disease modification resulting from anti-amyloid immunotherapy. Dynamic neurocognitive adaptation in aging: Development and validation of a new scale. Unraveling the impact of blood RANKL and OPG levels on Alzheimer's disease: Independent of bone mineral density and inflammation. Comparison of sample characteristics of Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants with the Wisconsin state population-An evaluation of the recruitment effort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1