55岁以下患者初次全膝关节置换术:中期翻修率令人担忧吗?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104171
Kamel Rouizi, Alexandre Couraudon, Maud Guedor, Olivier Roche, François Sirveaux, Didier Mainard
{"title":"55岁以下患者初次全膝关节置换术:中期翻修率令人担忧吗?","authors":"Kamel Rouizi, Alexandre Couraudon, Maud Guedor, Olivier Roche, François Sirveaux, Didier Mainard","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The indications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are expanding to include younger and more active patients. Several recent studies have warned of a higher revision rate and lower patient satisfaction in younger patients. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of TKAs in patients under the age of 55 and to determine the risk factors for revision and complications.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The hypothesis was that TKA survival in patients under 55 years of age is greater than 90% at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This work was a single-center retrospective study. All patients under 55 years of age with first-line TKA between 2006 and 2016 were included. The survival rate was calculated with TKA failure as the primary outcome, which was defined as revision surgery regardless of cause. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to meet the primary objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients (median age 52 years) with 193 TKAs were included. The mean follow-up was 7.9 years, and 24 cases of failure were identified. The 10-year survival rate was 86.6% (95% CI [81.1-92.2]). The mean time to failure was 4.1 years. Mechanical loosening and infection were the main causes of failure. Body mass index (BMI) appeared to increase the risk of revision (p < 0.01). TKAs with a third condyle were less strongly associated with the risk of revision and complications (p < 0.05), as was the presence of a tibial keel (p < 0.05). TKAs with posttraumatic gonarthrosis (p = 0.066), osteonecrosis (p < 0.05) and sequelae of septic arthritis (p < 0.05) appeared to be the most at risk of revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This hypothesis has not been verified, and TKA in patients under 55 years of age appears to have a higher revision rate than in the general population. The indication for TKA in these patients remains a reliable option, but certain risk factors must be considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age: is the mid-term revision rate worrying?\",\"authors\":\"Kamel Rouizi, Alexandre Couraudon, Maud Guedor, Olivier Roche, François Sirveaux, Didier Mainard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The indications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are expanding to include younger and more active patients. Several recent studies have warned of a higher revision rate and lower patient satisfaction in younger patients. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of TKAs in patients under the age of 55 and to determine the risk factors for revision and complications.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The hypothesis was that TKA survival in patients under 55 years of age is greater than 90% at 10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This work was a single-center retrospective study. All patients under 55 years of age with first-line TKA between 2006 and 2016 were included. The survival rate was calculated with TKA failure as the primary outcome, which was defined as revision surgery regardless of cause. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to meet the primary objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 168 patients (median age 52 years) with 193 TKAs were included. The mean follow-up was 7.9 years, and 24 cases of failure were identified. The 10-year survival rate was 86.6% (95% CI [81.1-92.2]). The mean time to failure was 4.1 years. Mechanical loosening and infection were the main causes of failure. Body mass index (BMI) appeared to increase the risk of revision (p < 0.01). TKAs with a third condyle were less strongly associated with the risk of revision and complications (p < 0.05), as was the presence of a tibial keel (p < 0.05). TKAs with posttraumatic gonarthrosis (p = 0.066), osteonecrosis (p < 0.05) and sequelae of septic arthritis (p < 0.05) appeared to be the most at risk of revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This hypothesis has not been verified, and TKA in patients under 55 years of age appears to have a higher revision rate than in the general population. The indication for TKA in these patients remains a reliable option, but certain risk factors must be considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; retrospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKA)的适应症正在扩大,包括年轻和更活跃的患者。最近的几项研究警告说,年轻患者的翻修率较高,患者满意度较低。本研究的目的是评估55岁以下tka患者的生存率,并确定修复和并发症的危险因素。假设:假设55岁以下患者10年TKA生存率大于90%。材料和方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究。在2006年至2016年期间,所有55岁以下的一线TKA患者均被纳入研究。生存率以TKA失败为主要结局计算,其定义为翻修手术,无论原因如何。Kaplan-Meier法用于满足主要目标。结果:共纳入168例患者(中位年龄52岁),共193例tka。平均随访7.9年,发现24例治疗失败。10年生存率为86.6% (95% CI[81.1 ~ 92.2])。平均失败时间为4.1年。机械松动和感染是失效的主要原因。体重指数(BMI)似乎增加了翻修的风险(p)。结论:这一假设尚未得到证实,55岁以下患者的TKA翻修率似乎高于一般人群。这些患者的TKA适应症仍然是一个可靠的选择,但必须考虑某些危险因素。证据等级:四级;回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age: is the mid-term revision rate worrying?

Introduction: The indications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are expanding to include younger and more active patients. Several recent studies have warned of a higher revision rate and lower patient satisfaction in younger patients. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of TKAs in patients under the age of 55 and to determine the risk factors for revision and complications.

Hypothesis: The hypothesis was that TKA survival in patients under 55 years of age is greater than 90% at 10 years.

Materials and methods: This work was a single-center retrospective study. All patients under 55 years of age with first-line TKA between 2006 and 2016 were included. The survival rate was calculated with TKA failure as the primary outcome, which was defined as revision surgery regardless of cause. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to meet the primary objective.

Results: A total of 168 patients (median age 52 years) with 193 TKAs were included. The mean follow-up was 7.9 years, and 24 cases of failure were identified. The 10-year survival rate was 86.6% (95% CI [81.1-92.2]). The mean time to failure was 4.1 years. Mechanical loosening and infection were the main causes of failure. Body mass index (BMI) appeared to increase the risk of revision (p < 0.01). TKAs with a third condyle were less strongly associated with the risk of revision and complications (p < 0.05), as was the presence of a tibial keel (p < 0.05). TKAs with posttraumatic gonarthrosis (p = 0.066), osteonecrosis (p < 0.05) and sequelae of septic arthritis (p < 0.05) appeared to be the most at risk of revision.

Conclusion: This hypothesis has not been verified, and TKA in patients under 55 years of age appears to have a higher revision rate than in the general population. The indication for TKA in these patients remains a reliable option, but certain risk factors must be considered.

Level of evidence: IV; retrospective study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Early Tibiotalar Arthrodesis via Posterior Approach Using an Inverted Humeral Plate in Tibial Pilon Fractures: Functional and Radiological Outcomes. Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evaluating the Transfer of Surgical Skills from Simulation on Synthetic Bone to Cadaveric Bone Osteosynthesis. Visualization of the posteromedial compartment in the knee: Comparison between a posterolateral transseptal approach with a standard anterior transnotch approach when repairing posterior lesions of the medial meniscus. Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1