{"title":"密室逃生作为形成性知识评估:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Chaewon Kim , Fengfeng Ke , Veronica Brewer","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Escape rooms offer an immersive approach to nursing education, serving as versatile tools for assessment and skill development. While research has explored their potential as alternatives to traditional assessments, their role as formative assessment and impact on knowledge retention in nursing education remain largely unexplored, prompting the need for further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study aims to explore the impact of escape rooms as formative assessment on first-year nursing students' knowledge retention.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We employed a quasi-experimental research design.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>Four escape rooms themed around medication, patient safety, low blood sugar, and sepsis were physically set up in a public university located in the southeast U.S. Student teams of two or three went through each room for an alternative formative assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>134 first-year nursing students, in clinical groups, were randomly assigned into an experimental condition and a control condition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A gameful experience questionnaire developed by Högberg et al. (2019) was adapted, comprising 47 items across six categories. Additionally, a test consisting of seventeen multiple-choice questions was administered online for pre-test, post-test, and retention test. Students' perceptions of their learning experiences were also gathered through an open-ended question, with themes identified from their responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The paired t-test on GamefulQuest scores revealed a significant difference between escape rooms and traditional assessment methods, with the experimental group showing notably higher levels of accomplishment, guidance, immersion, playfulness, and social experience. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups on knowledge retention. Student feedback on escape room experiences highlighted entertainment, educational value, collaboration dynamics, and logistical considerations, underscoring the multifaceted nature of these immersive learning environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Escape rooms promoted students' positive perception of learning experience, but showed no significant advantage over traditional assessment methods in terms of retention, aligning with existing literature on problem-based learning (PBL).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escape rooms as formative knowledge assessment: A quasi-experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Chaewon Kim , Fengfeng Ke , Veronica Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Escape rooms offer an immersive approach to nursing education, serving as versatile tools for assessment and skill development. While research has explored their potential as alternatives to traditional assessments, their role as formative assessment and impact on knowledge retention in nursing education remain largely unexplored, prompting the need for further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study aims to explore the impact of escape rooms as formative assessment on first-year nursing students' knowledge retention.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We employed a quasi-experimental research design.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>Four escape rooms themed around medication, patient safety, low blood sugar, and sepsis were physically set up in a public university located in the southeast U.S. Student teams of two or three went through each room for an alternative formative assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>134 first-year nursing students, in clinical groups, were randomly assigned into an experimental condition and a control condition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A gameful experience questionnaire developed by Högberg et al. (2019) was adapted, comprising 47 items across six categories. Additionally, a test consisting of seventeen multiple-choice questions was administered online for pre-test, post-test, and retention test. Students' perceptions of their learning experiences were also gathered through an open-ended question, with themes identified from their responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The paired t-test on GamefulQuest scores revealed a significant difference between escape rooms and traditional assessment methods, with the experimental group showing notably higher levels of accomplishment, guidance, immersion, playfulness, and social experience. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups on knowledge retention. Student feedback on escape room experiences highlighted entertainment, educational value, collaboration dynamics, and logistical considerations, underscoring the multifaceted nature of these immersive learning environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Escape rooms promoted students' positive perception of learning experience, but showed no significant advantage over traditional assessment methods in terms of retention, aligning with existing literature on problem-based learning (PBL).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Escape rooms as formative knowledge assessment: A quasi-experimental study
Background
Escape rooms offer an immersive approach to nursing education, serving as versatile tools for assessment and skill development. While research has explored their potential as alternatives to traditional assessments, their role as formative assessment and impact on knowledge retention in nursing education remain largely unexplored, prompting the need for further investigation.
Aim
The study aims to explore the impact of escape rooms as formative assessment on first-year nursing students' knowledge retention.
Design
We employed a quasi-experimental research design.
Settings
Four escape rooms themed around medication, patient safety, low blood sugar, and sepsis were physically set up in a public university located in the southeast U.S. Student teams of two or three went through each room for an alternative formative assessment.
Participants
134 first-year nursing students, in clinical groups, were randomly assigned into an experimental condition and a control condition.
Methods
A gameful experience questionnaire developed by Högberg et al. (2019) was adapted, comprising 47 items across six categories. Additionally, a test consisting of seventeen multiple-choice questions was administered online for pre-test, post-test, and retention test. Students' perceptions of their learning experiences were also gathered through an open-ended question, with themes identified from their responses.
Results
The paired t-test on GamefulQuest scores revealed a significant difference between escape rooms and traditional assessment methods, with the experimental group showing notably higher levels of accomplishment, guidance, immersion, playfulness, and social experience. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups on knowledge retention. Student feedback on escape room experiences highlighted entertainment, educational value, collaboration dynamics, and logistical considerations, underscoring the multifaceted nature of these immersive learning environments.
Conclusions
Escape rooms promoted students' positive perception of learning experience, but showed no significant advantage over traditional assessment methods in terms of retention, aligning with existing literature on problem-based learning (PBL).
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.