Nitai A Levy, Shereen Hawash, Riad Shiekh, Idit Pasternak
{"title":"儿科哮喘短效β2激动剂给药的急诊科护士与医生决策","authors":"Nitai A Levy, Shereen Hawash, Riad Shiekh, Idit Pasternak","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate triage nurses' clinical judgment in determining short acting β2-agonist bronchodilator therapy need for children with shortness of breath in the pediatric emergency department, without prior physician assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study compared decision-making between triage nurses and physicians regarding bronchodilator inhalation therapy necessity. Trained nurses assessed children aged 2-18 with shortness of breath, including history-taking, vital signs, and lung auscultation. Nurses made short acting β2-agonist therapy decisions based on predefined criteria. Pediatric specialists independently evaluated patients and recorded their decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 62 assessments from 31 patients showed no statistically significant difference between nurses and doctors in administering inhaled bronchodilators (nurses: 87.1 %, doctors: 83.9 %). Clinical sign detection was similar, except for tachypnea (nurses: 48.4 %, doctors: 71 %, P = 0.07). McNemar's test and Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated strong nurse-doctor correlation per patient (accuracy: 83.9 %, P = 0.1; kappa: 0.351).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses excelled in recognizing certain clinical signs but showed lower compatibility in others. For severe cases, nurses consistently identified patients needing additional treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"78-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse vs physician decision-making in the ED for short acting β2-agonist administration in pediatric asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Nitai A Levy, Shereen Hawash, Riad Shiekh, Idit Pasternak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate triage nurses' clinical judgment in determining short acting β2-agonist bronchodilator therapy need for children with shortness of breath in the pediatric emergency department, without prior physician assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study compared decision-making between triage nurses and physicians regarding bronchodilator inhalation therapy necessity. Trained nurses assessed children aged 2-18 with shortness of breath, including history-taking, vital signs, and lung auscultation. Nurses made short acting β2-agonist therapy decisions based on predefined criteria. Pediatric specialists independently evaluated patients and recorded their decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 62 assessments from 31 patients showed no statistically significant difference between nurses and doctors in administering inhaled bronchodilators (nurses: 87.1 %, doctors: 83.9 %). Clinical sign detection was similar, except for tachypnea (nurses: 48.4 %, doctors: 71 %, P = 0.07). McNemar's test and Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated strong nurse-doctor correlation per patient (accuracy: 83.9 %, P = 0.1; kappa: 0.351).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses excelled in recognizing certain clinical signs but showed lower compatibility in others. For severe cases, nurses consistently identified patients needing additional treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"78-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nurse vs physician decision-making in the ED for short acting β2-agonist administration in pediatric asthma.
Objective: To evaluate triage nurses' clinical judgment in determining short acting β2-agonist bronchodilator therapy need for children with shortness of breath in the pediatric emergency department, without prior physician assessment.
Methods: This prospective study compared decision-making between triage nurses and physicians regarding bronchodilator inhalation therapy necessity. Trained nurses assessed children aged 2-18 with shortness of breath, including history-taking, vital signs, and lung auscultation. Nurses made short acting β2-agonist therapy decisions based on predefined criteria. Pediatric specialists independently evaluated patients and recorded their decision.
Results: Analysis of 62 assessments from 31 patients showed no statistically significant difference between nurses and doctors in administering inhaled bronchodilators (nurses: 87.1 %, doctors: 83.9 %). Clinical sign detection was similar, except for tachypnea (nurses: 48.4 %, doctors: 71 %, P = 0.07). McNemar's test and Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated strong nurse-doctor correlation per patient (accuracy: 83.9 %, P = 0.1; kappa: 0.351).
Conclusions: Nurses excelled in recognizing certain clinical signs but showed lower compatibility in others. For severe cases, nurses consistently identified patients needing additional treatments.
期刊介绍:
A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.