脓毒症患者从农村小容量急诊科转到城市大容量医院的死亡率预测因素

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018
Arman Ameripour BS , Elizabeth Herrera MPH , Olivia Coskey MPH , Justin Ng BS , Cesar Cornejo Ochoa BS , Allison Modesette Bcom , Jenny T. Lee DO , Truman Ray K.G.C. Chun DO , Jasmeet Kaur DO , Andrew W. Hertel PhD , Barry C. Smith MD , Brian L. Delmonaco MD
{"title":"脓毒症患者从农村小容量急诊科转到城市大容量医院的死亡率预测因素","authors":"Arman Ameripour BS ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Herrera MPH ,&nbsp;Olivia Coskey MPH ,&nbsp;Justin Ng BS ,&nbsp;Cesar Cornejo Ochoa BS ,&nbsp;Allison Modesette Bcom ,&nbsp;Jenny T. Lee DO ,&nbsp;Truman Ray K.G.C. Chun DO ,&nbsp;Jasmeet Kaur DO ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Hertel PhD ,&nbsp;Barry C. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Brian L. Delmonaco MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>We investigated the extent to which demographic characteristics, clinical care aspects, and relevant biomarkers predicted sepsis-related mortality among patients transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department (ED) to an urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational study among adult severe sepsis patients (<em>N</em> = 242) who, within a community-based regional healthcare system, presented to one of the four rural, low-volume EDs and were subsequently transferred to the urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center, and were identified as septic at either location. We evaluated in-hospital and 30 days after discharge mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In-hospital mortality rate was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.89–15.94, <em>p</em> = 0.002), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.11–0.74, <em>p</em> = 0.01), and a moderately abnormal lactate level (OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.05–0.79, <em>p</em> = 0.03). Mortality 30 days after discharge was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR: 3.28, 95 % CI: 1.62–6.97, <em>p</em> = 0.001), abnormal red cell distribution width (OR: 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.11–4.60, <em>p</em> = 0.03), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR: 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.54, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and a moderately abnormal lactate (OR: 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.79, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Early identification of sepsis, as well as attention to prior ICU admission or comorbidities and abnormal red cell distribution width, could facilitate better care and prevent mortality among patients with sepsis who are transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department to an urban-high volume facility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 61-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of mortality among sepsis patients transferred from a rural, low-volume ED to an urban, high-volume hospital\",\"authors\":\"Arman Ameripour BS ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Herrera MPH ,&nbsp;Olivia Coskey MPH ,&nbsp;Justin Ng BS ,&nbsp;Cesar Cornejo Ochoa BS ,&nbsp;Allison Modesette Bcom ,&nbsp;Jenny T. Lee DO ,&nbsp;Truman Ray K.G.C. Chun DO ,&nbsp;Jasmeet Kaur DO ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Hertel PhD ,&nbsp;Barry C. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Brian L. Delmonaco MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>We investigated the extent to which demographic characteristics, clinical care aspects, and relevant biomarkers predicted sepsis-related mortality among patients transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department (ED) to an urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an observational study among adult severe sepsis patients (<em>N</em> = 242) who, within a community-based regional healthcare system, presented to one of the four rural, low-volume EDs and were subsequently transferred to the urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center, and were identified as septic at either location. We evaluated in-hospital and 30 days after discharge mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In-hospital mortality rate was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.89–15.94, <em>p</em> = 0.002), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.11–0.74, <em>p</em> = 0.01), and a moderately abnormal lactate level (OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.05–0.79, <em>p</em> = 0.03). Mortality 30 days after discharge was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR: 3.28, 95 % CI: 1.62–6.97, <em>p</em> = 0.001), abnormal red cell distribution width (OR: 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.11–4.60, <em>p</em> = 0.03), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR: 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.54, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and a moderately abnormal lactate (OR: 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.79, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Early identification of sepsis, as well as attention to prior ICU admission or comorbidities and abnormal red cell distribution width, could facilitate better care and prevent mortality among patients with sepsis who are transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department to an urban-high volume facility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 61-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:我们调查了人口统计学特征、临床护理方面和相关生物标志物在多大程度上预测了从农村小容量急诊科(ED)转到城市大容量二级创伤中心的患者败血症相关死亡率。方法:我们对成人严重脓毒症患者(N = 242)进行了一项观察性研究,这些患者在社区区域医疗保健系统内就诊于四家农村低容量急诊科之一,随后转至城市高容量二级创伤中心,并在两家医院均被确诊为脓毒症。我们评估了住院和出院后30天的死亡率。结果:住院死亡率可通过以下因素预测:(OR 5.02, 95% CI: 1.89-15.94, p = 0.002)、转移前是否发现败血症(OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74, p = 0.01)和中度乳酸水平异常(OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.79, p = 0.03)。出院后30天的死亡率可通过以下因素预测:曾入住ICU (OR: 3.28, 95% CI: 1.62 ~ 6.97, p = 0.001)、异常红细胞分布宽度(OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.11 ~ 4.60, p = 0.03)、转院前是否发现败血症(OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 0.54, p)脓毒症的早期识别,以及对先前ICU入住或合并症和异常红细胞分布宽度的关注,可以促进从农村低容量急诊部门转移到城市高容量设施的脓毒症患者的更好护理和预防死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of mortality among sepsis patients transferred from a rural, low-volume ED to an urban, high-volume hospital

Introduction

We investigated the extent to which demographic characteristics, clinical care aspects, and relevant biomarkers predicted sepsis-related mortality among patients transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department (ED) to an urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center.

Methods

We conducted an observational study among adult severe sepsis patients (N = 242) who, within a community-based regional healthcare system, presented to one of the four rural, low-volume EDs and were subsequently transferred to the urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center, and were identified as septic at either location. We evaluated in-hospital and 30 days after discharge mortality.

Results

In-hospital mortality rate was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.89–15.94, p = 0.002), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.11–0.74, p = 0.01), and a moderately abnormal lactate level (OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.05–0.79, p = 0.03). Mortality 30 days after discharge was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR: 3.28, 95 % CI: 1.62–6.97, p = 0.001), abnormal red cell distribution width (OR: 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.11–4.60, p = 0.03), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR: 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.54, p < 0.001), and a moderately abnormal lactate (OR: 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.12–0.79, p = 0.02).

Discussion

Early identification of sepsis, as well as attention to prior ICU admission or comorbidities and abnormal red cell distribution width, could facilitate better care and prevent mortality among patients with sepsis who are transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department to an urban-high volume facility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Double defibrillation for patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation Adenosine dose for supraventricular tachycardia Comparative safety and efficacy of a hybrid intravenous and oral diltiazem protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department A national digital quality measure to improve emergency department coagulation testing efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1