残疾人虚拟运动干预的当前趋势:范围综述。

Madison Mintz BS , James Rimmer PhD , Jereme Wilroy PhD , Robert Oster PhD , Leigh Bray PhD , Robin Lanzi PhD , Byron Lai PhD
{"title":"残疾人虚拟运动干预的当前趋势:范围综述。","authors":"Madison Mintz BS ,&nbsp;James Rimmer PhD ,&nbsp;Jereme Wilroy PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Oster PhD ,&nbsp;Leigh Bray PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Lanzi PhD ,&nbsp;Byron Lai PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze existing literature on virtual exercise interventions delivered to people with disabilities to assess effectiveness, efficiency, usability, satisfaction, and feasibility, and describe current trends that aimed to improve health outcomes among people with disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Articles were included if they were (1) incorporated a virtual exercise intervention including people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations aged 18 years and older and (2) published between the years of 2009-August 14, 2024 with free access to full-text, peer-reviewed papers; and (3) published in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) unrelated to disability; (2) non–peer-reviewed articles; (3) protocol or review papers; (4) study focused on virtual exercise through perspective other than that of the participant; (5) study's primary objectives were not related to physical functioning and/or rehabilitation; and (6) study used only qualitative methods.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>A single search was conducted from January 2023 and ceased on August 14, 2023. Duplicate records were pulled from the article search within each database; article abstracts were assessed; and finally, full-text articles were retained upon meeting inclusion criteria. The primary researcher conducted the initial search, while 2 independent reviewers, J.R. and J.W., assisted with and confirmed article extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Thirty-seven articles were included. Trends were explained by recapitulating statistically significant results per study among each disability group and virtual exercise delivery mode, exercise type, and intervention synchronicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More facilitators, satisfaction, usability, and perceived benefits were reported when compared to reported barriers among people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations who participated in virtual exercise interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Trends in Virtual Exercise Interventions Among People With Disabilities: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Madison Mintz BS ,&nbsp;James Rimmer PhD ,&nbsp;Jereme Wilroy PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Oster PhD ,&nbsp;Leigh Bray PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Lanzi PhD ,&nbsp;Byron Lai PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze existing literature on virtual exercise interventions delivered to people with disabilities to assess effectiveness, efficiency, usability, satisfaction, and feasibility, and describe current trends that aimed to improve health outcomes among people with disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Articles were included if they were (1) incorporated a virtual exercise intervention including people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations aged 18 years and older and (2) published between the years of 2009-August 14, 2024 with free access to full-text, peer-reviewed papers; and (3) published in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) unrelated to disability; (2) non–peer-reviewed articles; (3) protocol or review papers; (4) study focused on virtual exercise through perspective other than that of the participant; (5) study's primary objectives were not related to physical functioning and/or rehabilitation; and (6) study used only qualitative methods.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>A single search was conducted from January 2023 and ceased on August 14, 2023. Duplicate records were pulled from the article search within each database; article abstracts were assessed; and finally, full-text articles were retained upon meeting inclusion criteria. The primary researcher conducted the initial search, while 2 independent reviewers, J.R. and J.W., assisted with and confirmed article extraction.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Thirty-seven articles were included. Trends were explained by recapitulating statistically significant results per study among each disability group and virtual exercise delivery mode, exercise type, and intervention synchronicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More facilitators, satisfaction, usability, and perceived benefits were reported when compared to reported barriers among people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations who participated in virtual exercise interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734046/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析针对残疾人的虚拟运动干预的现有文献,以评估其有效性、效率、可用性、满意度和可行性,并描述旨在改善残疾人健康结果的当前趋势。数据来源:检索CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO。研究选择:纳入以下文章:(1)纳入虚拟运动干预,包括18岁及以上的身体残疾和行动不便的人;(2)发表于2009年8月14日至2024年8月14日之间,并可免费获取同行评审论文全文;(3)以英文出版。排除标准:(1)与残疾无关;(2)未经同行评议的文章;(三)方案或综述论文;(4)通过非参与者视角对虚拟锻炼进行研究;(5)研究的主要目标与身体功能和/或康复无关;(6)研究仅采用定性方法。数据提取:从2023年1月开始进行一次搜索,并于2023年8月14日结束。从每个数据库中的文章检索中提取重复记录;评估文章摘要;最后,符合纳入标准的全文文章被保留。主要研究者进行初步检索,两位独立审稿人J.R.和j.w.协助并确认文章提取。数据综合:纳入37篇文章。通过总结每项研究在每个残疾组和虚拟运动交付模式、运动类型和干预同步性中的统计显著结果来解释趋势。结论:与参与虚拟运动干预的身体残疾和行动受限人群中报告的障碍相比,报告了更多的促进因素、满意度、可用性和感知益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Trends in Virtual Exercise Interventions Among People With Disabilities: A Scoping Review

Objective

To analyze existing literature on virtual exercise interventions delivered to people with disabilities to assess effectiveness, efficiency, usability, satisfaction, and feasibility, and describe current trends that aimed to improve health outcomes among people with disabilities.

Data Sources

CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched.

Study Selection

Articles were included if they were (1) incorporated a virtual exercise intervention including people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations aged 18 years and older and (2) published between the years of 2009-August 14, 2024 with free access to full-text, peer-reviewed papers; and (3) published in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) unrelated to disability; (2) non–peer-reviewed articles; (3) protocol or review papers; (4) study focused on virtual exercise through perspective other than that of the participant; (5) study's primary objectives were not related to physical functioning and/or rehabilitation; and (6) study used only qualitative methods.

Data Extraction

A single search was conducted from January 2023 and ceased on August 14, 2023. Duplicate records were pulled from the article search within each database; article abstracts were assessed; and finally, full-text articles were retained upon meeting inclusion criteria. The primary researcher conducted the initial search, while 2 independent reviewers, J.R. and J.W., assisted with and confirmed article extraction.

Data Synthesis

Thirty-seven articles were included. Trends were explained by recapitulating statistically significant results per study among each disability group and virtual exercise delivery mode, exercise type, and intervention synchronicity.

Conclusions

More facilitators, satisfaction, usability, and perceived benefits were reported when compared to reported barriers among people with physical disabilities and mobility limitations who participated in virtual exercise interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children With Gait Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis The Effect of Sensory Reweighting on Postural Control and Cortical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1