Geiziane L R Melo, Rafaela C Espírito Santo, Viney P Dubey, Cesar Agostinis-Sobrinho
{"title":"唐氏综合症患者手部握力测量方案:系统回顾和meta回归。","authors":"Geiziane L R Melo, Rafaela C Espírito Santo, Viney P Dubey, Cesar Agostinis-Sobrinho","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2453077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Handgrip strength (HGS) serves as a robust predictor of overall strength across various populations, including individuals with Down Syndrome (DS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the HGS measurement protocols used in studies involving individuals with DS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary sources were sourced from six databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, ERIC, and Web of Science, spanning from inception to 23rd December 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on individuals with DS, compared with control groups, and examined HGS measurement protocols and outcomes. Meta-regression was utilized to assess bias associated with HGS values concerning different measurement protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 29 studies involving 1816 participants, most controlled for body position (65%), arm position (82%), elbow position (82%), wrist position (62%), handgrip duration (55%), hand adjustment to dynamometer (62%), verbal encouragement (75%), and familiarization (44.8%). The number of reported variables in the HGS protocol was significantly associated with an increase in HGS, with a mean estimate of 20.59 units (SE = 2.59, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, 95% CI [15.49-25.68]), though there was notable heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94.33%). The spline regression analysis showed that the model explained 82.66% of the variation in HGS, with adults having 47.61 units higher HGS than children (<i>p</i> = 0.0009), while obesity was linked to a decrease of 15.68 units (<i>p</i> = 0.0675). Sample size and group had no significant effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, protocols for assessing HGS in DS studies are comprehensive yet heterogeneous. Higher HGS values correlated with adherence to standard protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2453077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handgrip strength measurement protocols in individuals with Down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression.\",\"authors\":\"Geiziane L R Melo, Rafaela C Espírito Santo, Viney P Dubey, Cesar Agostinis-Sobrinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2453077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Handgrip strength (HGS) serves as a robust predictor of overall strength across various populations, including individuals with Down Syndrome (DS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the HGS measurement protocols used in studies involving individuals with DS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary sources were sourced from six databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, ERIC, and Web of Science, spanning from inception to 23rd December 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on individuals with DS, compared with control groups, and examined HGS measurement protocols and outcomes. Meta-regression was utilized to assess bias associated with HGS values concerning different measurement protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 29 studies involving 1816 participants, most controlled for body position (65%), arm position (82%), elbow position (82%), wrist position (62%), handgrip duration (55%), hand adjustment to dynamometer (62%), verbal encouragement (75%), and familiarization (44.8%). The number of reported variables in the HGS protocol was significantly associated with an increase in HGS, with a mean estimate of 20.59 units (SE = 2.59, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, 95% CI [15.49-25.68]), though there was notable heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94.33%). The spline regression analysis showed that the model explained 82.66% of the variation in HGS, with adults having 47.61 units higher HGS than children (<i>p</i> = 0.0009), while obesity was linked to a decrease of 15.68 units (<i>p</i> = 0.0675). Sample size and group had no significant effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, protocols for assessing HGS in DS studies are comprehensive yet heterogeneous. Higher HGS values correlated with adherence to standard protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2453077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2453077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2453077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:握力(HGS)是各种人群(包括唐氏综合症(DS)患者)整体力量的可靠预测指标。目的:分析在涉及退行性痴呆个体的研究中使用的HGS测量方案。方法:主要资料来源于六个数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Ovid、Embase、ERIC和Web of Science,时间跨度从成立到2023年12月23日。纳入标准侧重于DS患者,与对照组进行比较,并检查HGS测量方案和结果。meta回归用于评估不同测量方案下HGS值的偏倚。结果:在涉及1816名参与者的29项研究中,大多数控制身体位置(65%),手臂位置(82%),肘部位置(82%),手腕位置(62%),握力持续时间(55%),手对测力计的调整(62%),口头鼓励(75%)和熟悉(44.8%)。HGS方案中报告的变量数量与HGS的增加显著相关,平均估计为20.59个单位(SE = 2.59, p 2 = 94.33%)。样条回归分析表明,该模型解释了82.66%的HGS变异,成人的HGS比儿童高47.61个单位(p = 0.0009),而肥胖与HGS下降15.68个单位有关(p = 0.0675)。样本量和组间差异无统计学意义。结论:总体而言,在DS研究中评估HGS的方案是全面的但异质性的。较高的HGS值与遵守标准方案相关。
Handgrip strength measurement protocols in individuals with Down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression.
Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) serves as a robust predictor of overall strength across various populations, including individuals with Down Syndrome (DS).
Objective: To analyze the HGS measurement protocols used in studies involving individuals with DS.
Methods: Primary sources were sourced from six databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, ERIC, and Web of Science, spanning from inception to 23rd December 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on individuals with DS, compared with control groups, and examined HGS measurement protocols and outcomes. Meta-regression was utilized to assess bias associated with HGS values concerning different measurement protocols.
Results: Out of 29 studies involving 1816 participants, most controlled for body position (65%), arm position (82%), elbow position (82%), wrist position (62%), handgrip duration (55%), hand adjustment to dynamometer (62%), verbal encouragement (75%), and familiarization (44.8%). The number of reported variables in the HGS protocol was significantly associated with an increase in HGS, with a mean estimate of 20.59 units (SE = 2.59, p < 0.0001, 95% CI [15.49-25.68]), though there was notable heterogeneity (I2 = 94.33%). The spline regression analysis showed that the model explained 82.66% of the variation in HGS, with adults having 47.61 units higher HGS than children (p = 0.0009), while obesity was linked to a decrease of 15.68 units (p = 0.0675). Sample size and group had no significant effects.
Conclusion: Overall, protocols for assessing HGS in DS studies are comprehensive yet heterogeneous. Higher HGS values correlated with adherence to standard protocols.