评价中心线相关血流感染的充分性作为一种质量措施:在单一三级保健中心的横断面分析。

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001205
Piyush Mathur, Amanda J Naylor, Moises Auron, Jean Beresian, Alexandra Tallman, Allison Griffith, Kathleen Seasholtz, Mariel Manlapaz, Katherine Zacharyasz, Reem Khatib, Shreya Mishra, Kathryn Haller, Thomas Fraser, Katherine Holman
{"title":"评价中心线相关血流感染的充分性作为一种质量措施:在单一三级保健中心的横断面分析。","authors":"Piyush Mathur, Amanda J Naylor, Moises Auron, Jean Beresian, Alexandra Tallman, Allison Griffith, Kathleen Seasholtz, Mariel Manlapaz, Katherine Zacharyasz, Reem Khatib, Shreya Mishra, Kathryn Haller, Thomas Fraser, Katherine Holman","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The current definition of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) may overestimate the true incidence of CLABSI as it is often unclear whether the bloodstream infection (BSI) is secondary to the central line or due to another infectious source.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the prevalence and outcomes of central CLABSI at our institution, to identify opportunities for improvement, appropriately direct efforts for infection reduction, and identify gaps in the CLABSI definition and its application as a quality measure.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients identified to have a CLABSI in the period 2018-2022 cared for at the value-based purchasing (VBP) units of a 1200-bed tertiary care hospital located in Cleveland, OH. Each CLABSI episode was assessed for relationship with central venous catheter (CVC), suspected secondary source of BSI, mortality associated with the CLABSI hospital encounter, and availability of infectious disease physician or primary physician documentation of infectious source.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>CLABSI episodes were classified as CVC related, CVC unrelated, and CVC relationship unclear. Mortality during the same encounter as the CLABSI event was assessed as an outcome measure. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 340 CLABSI episodes occurred in adult patients in VBP units. Majority of the CLABSI, 77.5% (266), occurred in the ICU. Of the CLABSI analyzed, 31.5% (107) were classified as unrelated to the CVC; 25.0% (85) had an unclear source; 43% (148) were classified as CVC related. For CVC-related cases, <i>Staphylococcus</i> and <i>Candida</i> were the predominant organisms. For the CVC unrelated and unclear groups <i>Enterococcus</i> was most prevalent. The mortality rate was lowest among patients classified with a CVC-related BSI. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLABSI definition to predict a true CVC-related infection was found to be 58.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The definition of CLABSI as a surrogate for catheter-related BSI is inadequate, with a PPV of 58.0% (43.1-67.6%). Efforts should be redirected toward revising the CLABSI definition and possibly reevaluating its criteria. Resources should be assigned to further investigate and systematically prevent BSIs from secondary sources while adhering to existing CLABSI prevention bundles.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 1","pages":"e1205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Adequacy of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection As a Quality Measure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at a Single Tertiary Care Center.\",\"authors\":\"Piyush Mathur, Amanda J Naylor, Moises Auron, Jean Beresian, Alexandra Tallman, Allison Griffith, Kathleen Seasholtz, Mariel Manlapaz, Katherine Zacharyasz, Reem Khatib, Shreya Mishra, Kathryn Haller, Thomas Fraser, Katherine Holman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The current definition of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) may overestimate the true incidence of CLABSI as it is often unclear whether the bloodstream infection (BSI) is secondary to the central line or due to another infectious source.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess the prevalence and outcomes of central CLABSI at our institution, to identify opportunities for improvement, appropriately direct efforts for infection reduction, and identify gaps in the CLABSI definition and its application as a quality measure.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients identified to have a CLABSI in the period 2018-2022 cared for at the value-based purchasing (VBP) units of a 1200-bed tertiary care hospital located in Cleveland, OH. Each CLABSI episode was assessed for relationship with central venous catheter (CVC), suspected secondary source of BSI, mortality associated with the CLABSI hospital encounter, and availability of infectious disease physician or primary physician documentation of infectious source.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>CLABSI episodes were classified as CVC related, CVC unrelated, and CVC relationship unclear. Mortality during the same encounter as the CLABSI event was assessed as an outcome measure. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 340 CLABSI episodes occurred in adult patients in VBP units. Majority of the CLABSI, 77.5% (266), occurred in the ICU. Of the CLABSI analyzed, 31.5% (107) were classified as unrelated to the CVC; 25.0% (85) had an unclear source; 43% (148) were classified as CVC related. For CVC-related cases, <i>Staphylococcus</i> and <i>Candida</i> were the predominant organisms. For the CVC unrelated and unclear groups <i>Enterococcus</i> was most prevalent. The mortality rate was lowest among patients classified with a CVC-related BSI. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLABSI definition to predict a true CVC-related infection was found to be 58.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The definition of CLABSI as a surrogate for catheter-related BSI is inadequate, with a PPV of 58.0% (43.1-67.6%). Efforts should be redirected toward revising the CLABSI definition and possibly reevaluating its criteria. Resources should be assigned to further investigate and systematically prevent BSIs from secondary sources while adhering to existing CLABSI prevention bundles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"e1205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:目前中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)的定义可能高估了CLABSI的真实发生率,因为通常不清楚血流感染(BSI)是继发于中心线还是由于其他感染源。目的:我们旨在评估我们机构中心CLABSI的流行程度和结果,确定改进的机会,适当地指导减少感染的努力,并确定CLABSI定义及其作为质量衡量标准的应用中的差距。设计环境和参与者:回顾性横断面研究,对2018-2022年期间在俄亥俄州克利夫兰市一家拥有1200张床位的三级医疗医院的基于价值的采购(VBP)单位治疗的CLABSI患者进行研究。评估每次CLABSI发作与中心静脉导管(CVC)、疑似BSI继发性来源、与CLABSI医院就诊相关的死亡率以及传染病医生或主治医生对传染源的记录的可用性的关系。主要结局和指标:CLABSI发作分为CVC相关、CVC无关和CVC关系不明确。在与CLABSI事件相同的遭遇期间,死亡率被评估为一项结果测量。进行描述性统计。结果:在VBP单元的成人患者中共发生340次CLABSI发作。大多数CLABSI(77.5%, 266例)发生在ICU。在分析的CLABSI中,31.5%(107例)被归类为与CVC无关;25.0%(85例)来源不明;43%(148例)为CVC相关。对于cvc相关病例,葡萄球菌和念珠菌是优势菌。CVC无亲缘关系和不明确的组以肠球菌为主。cvc相关BSI患者的死亡率最低。疾病控制和预防中心CLABSI定义预测cvc相关感染的阳性预测值(PPV)为58.0%。结论和相关性:CLABSI作为导管相关性BSI的替代品的定义是不充分的,PPV为58.0%(43.1-67.6%)。应重新努力修订CLABSI的定义,并可能重新评价其标准。应分配资源进一步调查和系统地预防次要来源的bsi,同时坚持现有的CLABSI预防包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Adequacy of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection As a Quality Measure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at a Single Tertiary Care Center.

Importance: The current definition of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) may overestimate the true incidence of CLABSI as it is often unclear whether the bloodstream infection (BSI) is secondary to the central line or due to another infectious source.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the prevalence and outcomes of central CLABSI at our institution, to identify opportunities for improvement, appropriately direct efforts for infection reduction, and identify gaps in the CLABSI definition and its application as a quality measure.

Design setting and participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients identified to have a CLABSI in the period 2018-2022 cared for at the value-based purchasing (VBP) units of a 1200-bed tertiary care hospital located in Cleveland, OH. Each CLABSI episode was assessed for relationship with central venous catheter (CVC), suspected secondary source of BSI, mortality associated with the CLABSI hospital encounter, and availability of infectious disease physician or primary physician documentation of infectious source.

Main outcomes and measures: CLABSI episodes were classified as CVC related, CVC unrelated, and CVC relationship unclear. Mortality during the same encounter as the CLABSI event was assessed as an outcome measure. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: A total of 340 CLABSI episodes occurred in adult patients in VBP units. Majority of the CLABSI, 77.5% (266), occurred in the ICU. Of the CLABSI analyzed, 31.5% (107) were classified as unrelated to the CVC; 25.0% (85) had an unclear source; 43% (148) were classified as CVC related. For CVC-related cases, Staphylococcus and Candida were the predominant organisms. For the CVC unrelated and unclear groups Enterococcus was most prevalent. The mortality rate was lowest among patients classified with a CVC-related BSI. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLABSI definition to predict a true CVC-related infection was found to be 58.0%.

Conclusions and relevance: The definition of CLABSI as a surrogate for catheter-related BSI is inadequate, with a PPV of 58.0% (43.1-67.6%). Efforts should be redirected toward revising the CLABSI definition and possibly reevaluating its criteria. Resources should be assigned to further investigate and systematically prevent BSIs from secondary sources while adhering to existing CLABSI prevention bundles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System. Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System. Multidimensional 1-Year Outcomes After Intensive Care Admission for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Composite Primary Outcomes Reported in Studies of Critical Care: A Scoping Review. Evaluating the Adequacy of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection As a Quality Measure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at a Single Tertiary Care Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1