Alirocumab单药治疗与依折麦比加他汀治疗对ASCVD退伍军人LDL-C降低的影响

Han Nguyen, Brandon Hubert, Courtney Rogen, Rose Anderson
{"title":"Alirocumab单药治疗与依折麦比加他汀治疗对ASCVD退伍军人LDL-C降低的影响","authors":"Han Nguyen, Brandon Hubert, Courtney Rogen, Rose Anderson","doi":"10.12788/fp.0522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of < 70 mg/dL for patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While alirocumab monotherapy and ezetimibe plus statin therapy have both shown efficacy in independently reducing LDL-C, a direct comparison has not been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review at the Veterans Affairs Sioux Falls Health Care System compared 20 patients with a history of ASCVD events who received alirocumab monotherapy to 60 patients receiving ezetimibe plus statin therapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of reaching the < 70 mg/dL LDL-C goal after 4 to 12 weeks, 13 to 24 weeks, and 25 to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (70%) in the alirocumab monotherapy group reached the LDL-C goal (< 70 mg/dL) compared with 34 patients (57%) in the ezetimibe plus statin group (<i>P</i> = .29). In both groups, the goal was most frequently achieved in 25 to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a small population of veterans with ASCVD, there was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in LDL-C reduction or in several secondary endpoints, including percentage change in high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides, ASCVD events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. However, a statistically significant difference in percentage reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol was found favoring alirocumab monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"41 11","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Alirocumab Monotherapy vs Ezetimibe Plus Statin Therapy on LDL-C Lowering in Veterans With History of ASCVD.\",\"authors\":\"Han Nguyen, Brandon Hubert, Courtney Rogen, Rose Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of < 70 mg/dL for patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While alirocumab monotherapy and ezetimibe plus statin therapy have both shown efficacy in independently reducing LDL-C, a direct comparison has not been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review at the Veterans Affairs Sioux Falls Health Care System compared 20 patients with a history of ASCVD events who received alirocumab monotherapy to 60 patients receiving ezetimibe plus statin therapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of reaching the < 70 mg/dL LDL-C goal after 4 to 12 weeks, 13 to 24 weeks, and 25 to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (70%) in the alirocumab monotherapy group reached the LDL-C goal (< 70 mg/dL) compared with 34 patients (57%) in the ezetimibe plus statin group (<i>P</i> = .29). In both groups, the goal was most frequently achieved in 25 to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a small population of veterans with ASCVD, there was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in LDL-C reduction or in several secondary endpoints, including percentage change in high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides, ASCVD events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. However, a statistically significant difference in percentage reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol was found favoring alirocumab monotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"41 11\",\"pages\":\"376-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南推荐高危动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标为< 70 mg/dL。虽然alirocumab单药治疗和依折麦贝联合他汀类药物治疗均显示出独立降低LDL-C的疗效,但尚未进行直接比较。方法:对苏福尔斯退伍军人事务医疗保健系统的20例有ASCVD事件史的患者接受阿利单抗单药治疗和60例接受依折替米贝加他汀类药物治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。主要终点是在4至12周、13至24周和25至52周后达到< 70 mg/dL LDL-C目标的发生率。结果:alirocumab单药治疗组14例(70%)患者达到LDL-C目标(< 70 mg/dL),而依折替米贝加他汀组34例(57%)患者达到LDL-C目标(P = 0.29)。在这两组中,目标最常在25至52周内实现。结论:在一小部分患有ASCVD的退伍军人中,两个治疗组在LDL-C降低或几个次要终点(包括高密度脂蛋白和甘油三酯的百分比变化、ASCVD事件和导致停药的不良事件)方面没有显著差异。然而,在LDL-C和总胆固醇降低百分比方面,有统计学上的显著差异,这有利于阿利单抗单药治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Alirocumab Monotherapy vs Ezetimibe Plus Statin Therapy on LDL-C Lowering in Veterans With History of ASCVD.

Background: Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of < 70 mg/dL for patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While alirocumab monotherapy and ezetimibe plus statin therapy have both shown efficacy in independently reducing LDL-C, a direct comparison has not been conducted.

Methods: A retrospective chart review at the Veterans Affairs Sioux Falls Health Care System compared 20 patients with a history of ASCVD events who received alirocumab monotherapy to 60 patients receiving ezetimibe plus statin therapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of reaching the < 70 mg/dL LDL-C goal after 4 to 12 weeks, 13 to 24 weeks, and 25 to 52 weeks.

Results: Fourteen patients (70%) in the alirocumab monotherapy group reached the LDL-C goal (< 70 mg/dL) compared with 34 patients (57%) in the ezetimibe plus statin group (P = .29). In both groups, the goal was most frequently achieved in 25 to 52 weeks.

Conclusions: In a small population of veterans with ASCVD, there was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in LDL-C reduction or in several secondary endpoints, including percentage change in high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides, ASCVD events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. However, a statistically significant difference in percentage reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol was found favoring alirocumab monotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact and Recovery of VHA Epilepsy Care Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Satisfaction With Department of Veterans Affairs Prosthetics and Support Services as Reported by Women and Men Veterans. The Veteran's Canon Under Fire. Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Fingerstick Monitoring for Hemoglobin A1c Control in Veterans. Evaluating Use of Empagliflozin for Diabetes Management in Veterans With Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1