{"title":"医疗保健教育中的团体学习契约:系统回顾。","authors":"Minh Chau , Clare L Singh , Tricia Bowman","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><div>Group work plays a crucial role in healthcare education by fostering collaboration, communication, and teamwork skills. However, students often face challenges such as unequal workload distribution, conflict, and anxiety. Group learning contracts have been introduced to improve group dynamics by setting clear expectations, enhancing accountability, and promoting effective collaboration. This systematic review explores the impact of group learning contracts on students’ experiences in healthcare education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search across six databases, including Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, identified studies published from inception to 2023. Keywords related to group work, healthcare education, and learning contracts were used. Data extraction and quality appraisal followed the PRISMA guidelines, with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) used for bias assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All four studies demonstrated positive outcomes from using group learning contracts. Improvements included better workload distribution, increased communication, reduced anxiety, and enhanced collaboration. One study reported greater effectiveness of these contracts in online learning settings. Some students, however, found the additional paperwork burdensome. Despite overall low bias risk, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and absence of control groups, were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings highlight the potential of group learning contracts to mitigate common challenges in group work and enhance students' learning experiences. Aligning with previous research, structured agreements foster accountability and reduce group-related stress.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Group learning contracts are valuable tools in healthcare education, promoting positive group dynamics and improving student outcomes. Further research with larger, more diverse samples is needed to confirm these findings and optimize implementation across various educational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 101843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group learning contracts in healthcare education: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Minh Chau , Clare L Singh , Tricia Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><div>Group work plays a crucial role in healthcare education by fostering collaboration, communication, and teamwork skills. However, students often face challenges such as unequal workload distribution, conflict, and anxiety. Group learning contracts have been introduced to improve group dynamics by setting clear expectations, enhancing accountability, and promoting effective collaboration. This systematic review explores the impact of group learning contracts on students’ experiences in healthcare education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search across six databases, including Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, identified studies published from inception to 2023. Keywords related to group work, healthcare education, and learning contracts were used. Data extraction and quality appraisal followed the PRISMA guidelines, with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) used for bias assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All four studies demonstrated positive outcomes from using group learning contracts. Improvements included better workload distribution, increased communication, reduced anxiety, and enhanced collaboration. One study reported greater effectiveness of these contracts in online learning settings. Some students, however, found the additional paperwork burdensome. Despite overall low bias risk, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and absence of control groups, were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings highlight the potential of group learning contracts to mitigate common challenges in group work and enhance students' learning experiences. Aligning with previous research, structured agreements foster accountability and reduce group-related stress.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Group learning contracts are valuable tools in healthcare education, promoting positive group dynamics and improving student outcomes. Further research with larger, more diverse samples is needed to confirm these findings and optimize implementation across various educational contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424005745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424005745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Group learning contracts in healthcare education: A systematic review
Introduction/Background
Group work plays a crucial role in healthcare education by fostering collaboration, communication, and teamwork skills. However, students often face challenges such as unequal workload distribution, conflict, and anxiety. Group learning contracts have been introduced to improve group dynamics by setting clear expectations, enhancing accountability, and promoting effective collaboration. This systematic review explores the impact of group learning contracts on students’ experiences in healthcare education.
Methods
A comprehensive search across six databases, including Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, identified studies published from inception to 2023. Keywords related to group work, healthcare education, and learning contracts were used. Data extraction and quality appraisal followed the PRISMA guidelines, with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) used for bias assessment.
Results
All four studies demonstrated positive outcomes from using group learning contracts. Improvements included better workload distribution, increased communication, reduced anxiety, and enhanced collaboration. One study reported greater effectiveness of these contracts in online learning settings. Some students, however, found the additional paperwork burdensome. Despite overall low bias risk, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and absence of control groups, were noted.
Discussion
The findings highlight the potential of group learning contracts to mitigate common challenges in group work and enhance students' learning experiences. Aligning with previous research, structured agreements foster accountability and reduce group-related stress.
Conclusion
Group learning contracts are valuable tools in healthcare education, promoting positive group dynamics and improving student outcomes. Further research with larger, more diverse samples is needed to confirm these findings and optimize implementation across various educational contexts.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.