人胎儿和青春期前睾丸组织的生殖细胞定量-当前方法的比较。

IF 2.8 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Reproduction & fertility Pub Date : 2025-02-07 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1530/RAF-24-0116
Emma Kearney, David Greenald, Gabriele Matilionyte, Sheila Lane, Melissa D Tharmalingam, Jill Davies, Jan-Bernd Stukenborg, Grace Forsyth, Rod T Mitchell
{"title":"人胎儿和青春期前睾丸组织的生殖细胞定量-当前方法的比较。","authors":"Emma Kearney, David Greenald, Gabriele Matilionyte, Sheila Lane, Melissa D Tharmalingam, Jill Davies, Jan-Bernd Stukenborg, Grace Forsyth, Rod T Mitchell","doi":"10.1530/RAF-24-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Methods to quantify germ cell number in human immature testicular tissues are essential to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy exposures and to optimise cryopreservation protocols used in fertility preservation for prepubertal boys. Established quantification methods rely on the presence of round tubules within the tissue. However, round tubular cross sections are limited in human prepubertal testicular tissues, especially when using in vitro culture. We aimed to assess whether an alternative method of germ cell quantification would provide similar results to recently established methods, without the requirement for round tubules. Human testicular samples included fetal tissue (exposed in vitro to cisplatin, carboplatin or control) or prepubertal tissue (fresh, cryopreserved, fresh in vitro cultured or cryopreserved in vitro cultured). Immunofluorescence assessed AP2γ (gonocytes) and MAGE-A4 ((pre)spermatogonia) expression. Germ cells were quantified by tubular germ cell density (Method 1), which was compared to methods that require round tubules, including spermatogonial number per round tubular cross section (S/T) (Method 2), fertility index (Method 3) and round tubular germ cell density (Method 4). A correlation analysis between methods was performed. Method 1 is strongly and significantly correlated with Method 2 (r = 0.838, P < 0.0001; r = 0.833, P < 0.0001), Method 3 (r = 0.752, P < 0.001; r = 0.802, P < 0.0001) and Method 4 (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.914, P < 0.0001) for fetal and prepubertal tissues, respectively. Given that Method 1 assess tubules irrespective of shape, it may increase the total number of germ cells available for quantification, validating its use for quantification of human testicular tissue samples where the amount of tissue or presence of round tubules is limited.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Chemotherapy can damage cells in the testicles that are required to make sperm, often leading to infertility in males. While options to preserve fertility in adult males are available, there are no established methods for young boys. To investigate how chemotherapy damages these cells and to explore approaches to preserve fertility, we require methods to count the number of cells that can develop into sperm. Existing counting methods involve only counting some of the cells in the tissue, but in young boys, it is often necessary to count all of the cells because the amount of tissue is limited. To overcome this, we counted cells in small pieces of human fetal and prepubertal testicles using an alternative method, which allows all cells to be counted. We found similar results using our method compared to three existing methods, making our method useful for counting cells in fetal and prepubertal testicle samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Germ cell quantification in human fetal and prepubertal testis tissues: a comparison of current methodologies.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Kearney, David Greenald, Gabriele Matilionyte, Sheila Lane, Melissa D Tharmalingam, Jill Davies, Jan-Bernd Stukenborg, Grace Forsyth, Rod T Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/RAF-24-0116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Methods to quantify germ cell number in human immature testicular tissues are essential to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy exposures and to optimise cryopreservation protocols used in fertility preservation for prepubertal boys. Established quantification methods rely on the presence of round tubules within the tissue. However, round tubular cross sections are limited in human prepubertal testicular tissues, especially when using in vitro culture. We aimed to assess whether an alternative method of germ cell quantification would provide similar results to recently established methods, without the requirement for round tubules. Human testicular samples included fetal tissue (exposed in vitro to cisplatin, carboplatin or control) or prepubertal tissue (fresh, cryopreserved, fresh in vitro cultured or cryopreserved in vitro cultured). Immunofluorescence assessed AP2γ (gonocytes) and MAGE-A4 ((pre)spermatogonia) expression. Germ cells were quantified by tubular germ cell density (Method 1), which was compared to methods that require round tubules, including spermatogonial number per round tubular cross section (S/T) (Method 2), fertility index (Method 3) and round tubular germ cell density (Method 4). A correlation analysis between methods was performed. Method 1 is strongly and significantly correlated with Method 2 (r = 0.838, P < 0.0001; r = 0.833, P < 0.0001), Method 3 (r = 0.752, P < 0.001; r = 0.802, P < 0.0001) and Method 4 (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.914, P < 0.0001) for fetal and prepubertal tissues, respectively. Given that Method 1 assess tubules irrespective of shape, it may increase the total number of germ cells available for quantification, validating its use for quantification of human testicular tissue samples where the amount of tissue or presence of round tubules is limited.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Chemotherapy can damage cells in the testicles that are required to make sperm, often leading to infertility in males. While options to preserve fertility in adult males are available, there are no established methods for young boys. To investigate how chemotherapy damages these cells and to explore approaches to preserve fertility, we require methods to count the number of cells that can develop into sperm. Existing counting methods involve only counting some of the cells in the tissue, but in young boys, it is often necessary to count all of the cells because the amount of tissue is limited. To overcome this, we counted cells in small pieces of human fetal and prepubertal testicles using an alternative method, which allows all cells to be counted. We found similar results using our method compared to three existing methods, making our method useful for counting cells in fetal and prepubertal testicle samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproduction & fertility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproduction & fertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-24-0116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-24-0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量化人类未成熟睾丸组织中生殖细胞数量的方法对于评估化疗暴露的影响以及优化用于青春期前男孩生育能力保存的冷冻保存方案至关重要。已建立的定量方法依赖于组织内圆管的存在。然而,圆形管状截面在人类青春期前睾丸组织中是有限的,特别是在体外培养时。我们的目的是评估一种生殖细胞定量的替代方法是否会提供与最近建立的方法相似的结果,而不需要圆管。人类睾丸样本包括胎儿组织(在体外暴露于顺铂、卡铂或对照)或青春期前组织(新鲜、冷冻保存、新鲜体外培养或体外冷冻保存)。免疫荧光检测AP2γ(性腺细胞)和MAGE-A4(前)精原细胞)的表达。用管状生殖细胞密度法(方法1)定量生殖细胞,并与需要圆管的方法进行比较,包括:每圆管截面精原细胞数(S/T)(方法2)、生育指数(FI)(方法3)和圆管生殖细胞密度(方法4),并进行方法间的相关性分析。方法1与方法2相关性强且显著(r=0.838, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Germ cell quantification in human fetal and prepubertal testis tissues: a comparison of current methodologies.

Abstract: Methods to quantify germ cell number in human immature testicular tissues are essential to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy exposures and to optimise cryopreservation protocols used in fertility preservation for prepubertal boys. Established quantification methods rely on the presence of round tubules within the tissue. However, round tubular cross sections are limited in human prepubertal testicular tissues, especially when using in vitro culture. We aimed to assess whether an alternative method of germ cell quantification would provide similar results to recently established methods, without the requirement for round tubules. Human testicular samples included fetal tissue (exposed in vitro to cisplatin, carboplatin or control) or prepubertal tissue (fresh, cryopreserved, fresh in vitro cultured or cryopreserved in vitro cultured). Immunofluorescence assessed AP2γ (gonocytes) and MAGE-A4 ((pre)spermatogonia) expression. Germ cells were quantified by tubular germ cell density (Method 1), which was compared to methods that require round tubules, including spermatogonial number per round tubular cross section (S/T) (Method 2), fertility index (Method 3) and round tubular germ cell density (Method 4). A correlation analysis between methods was performed. Method 1 is strongly and significantly correlated with Method 2 (r = 0.838, P < 0.0001; r = 0.833, P < 0.0001), Method 3 (r = 0.752, P < 0.001; r = 0.802, P < 0.0001) and Method 4 (r = 0.863, P < 0.0001; r = 0.914, P < 0.0001) for fetal and prepubertal tissues, respectively. Given that Method 1 assess tubules irrespective of shape, it may increase the total number of germ cells available for quantification, validating its use for quantification of human testicular tissue samples where the amount of tissue or presence of round tubules is limited.

Lay summary: Chemotherapy can damage cells in the testicles that are required to make sperm, often leading to infertility in males. While options to preserve fertility in adult males are available, there are no established methods for young boys. To investigate how chemotherapy damages these cells and to explore approaches to preserve fertility, we require methods to count the number of cells that can develop into sperm. Existing counting methods involve only counting some of the cells in the tissue, but in young boys, it is often necessary to count all of the cells because the amount of tissue is limited. To overcome this, we counted cells in small pieces of human fetal and prepubertal testicles using an alternative method, which allows all cells to be counted. We found similar results using our method compared to three existing methods, making our method useful for counting cells in fetal and prepubertal testicle samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Germ cell quantification in human fetal and prepubertal testis tissues: a comparison of current methodologies. Oral dydrogesterone versus oral micronized progesterone in threatened miscarriage: protocol paper for a randomized controlled trial. Impact of paternal high energy diets on semen quality and embryo development in cattle. Dyspareunia is rarely assessed in rodent models of endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Comparing surface immune markers in successful and non-viable ART pregnancies on the day of hCG measurement: a prospective pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1