{"title":"医学生缓和疗护教育之建构:新架构与袖珍卡片之影响。","authors":"Margot Manning, Logan N Beyer, Dorothy W Tolchin","doi":"10.1177/10499091251315152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palliative care (PC) education is not uniformly provided across U.S. medical schools. While PC competencies for medical students have been articulated, no student-facing, unifying framework for competency-based PC learning exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, we developed a student-facing organizing framework (the \"6 Ps\") based on existing PC competencies and created a pocket card introducing foundational PC concepts organized within the 6 Ps framework. In 2023, we provided a mandatory 15-minute session to introduce the 6 Ps and pocket card to the first-year class of our large, urban medical school. We provided voluntary pre- and post- session surveys to evaluate usability and impact of the framework and pocket card.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred-twenty students of the 204-student class (59%) attended. Survey response rate was 106/120 (88%) pre-session and 101/120 (84%) post-session. Following the session, students agreed the 6 Ps was a good framework for conceptualizing PC (95/101; 94%), that the pocket card was understandable (96/101; 95%), and they would use the pocket card to teach fellow students about PC (85/101; 84%). Nearly all students endorsed learning novel concepts (95/100; 95%). Pre/post session comparison of self-assessed confidence approaching hypothetical clinical tasks, such as educating a patient about PC and hospice, revealed significant improvement (<i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>First-year medical students were able to use the 6 Ps framework and pocket card after a brief introduction, endorsing new learning and demonstrating significant gains in knowledge and self-assessed confidence. Medical educators across schools may consider adopting this novel tool and approach to introduce or support student learning about PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251315152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structuring Palliative Care Education for Medical Students: Impact of a Novel Framework and Pocket Card.\",\"authors\":\"Margot Manning, Logan N Beyer, Dorothy W Tolchin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251315152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Palliative care (PC) education is not uniformly provided across U.S. medical schools. While PC competencies for medical students have been articulated, no student-facing, unifying framework for competency-based PC learning exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, we developed a student-facing organizing framework (the \\\"6 Ps\\\") based on existing PC competencies and created a pocket card introducing foundational PC concepts organized within the 6 Ps framework. In 2023, we provided a mandatory 15-minute session to introduce the 6 Ps and pocket card to the first-year class of our large, urban medical school. We provided voluntary pre- and post- session surveys to evaluate usability and impact of the framework and pocket card.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred-twenty students of the 204-student class (59%) attended. Survey response rate was 106/120 (88%) pre-session and 101/120 (84%) post-session. Following the session, students agreed the 6 Ps was a good framework for conceptualizing PC (95/101; 94%), that the pocket card was understandable (96/101; 95%), and they would use the pocket card to teach fellow students about PC (85/101; 84%). Nearly all students endorsed learning novel concepts (95/100; 95%). Pre/post session comparison of self-assessed confidence approaching hypothetical clinical tasks, such as educating a patient about PC and hospice, revealed significant improvement (<i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>First-year medical students were able to use the 6 Ps framework and pocket card after a brief introduction, endorsing new learning and demonstrating significant gains in knowledge and self-assessed confidence. Medical educators across schools may consider adopting this novel tool and approach to introduce or support student learning about PC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251315152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251315152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251315152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structuring Palliative Care Education for Medical Students: Impact of a Novel Framework and Pocket Card.
Introduction: Palliative care (PC) education is not uniformly provided across U.S. medical schools. While PC competencies for medical students have been articulated, no student-facing, unifying framework for competency-based PC learning exists.
Methods: In 2022, we developed a student-facing organizing framework (the "6 Ps") based on existing PC competencies and created a pocket card introducing foundational PC concepts organized within the 6 Ps framework. In 2023, we provided a mandatory 15-minute session to introduce the 6 Ps and pocket card to the first-year class of our large, urban medical school. We provided voluntary pre- and post- session surveys to evaluate usability and impact of the framework and pocket card.
Results: One hundred-twenty students of the 204-student class (59%) attended. Survey response rate was 106/120 (88%) pre-session and 101/120 (84%) post-session. Following the session, students agreed the 6 Ps was a good framework for conceptualizing PC (95/101; 94%), that the pocket card was understandable (96/101; 95%), and they would use the pocket card to teach fellow students about PC (85/101; 84%). Nearly all students endorsed learning novel concepts (95/100; 95%). Pre/post session comparison of self-assessed confidence approaching hypothetical clinical tasks, such as educating a patient about PC and hospice, revealed significant improvement (P < .01).
Discussion: First-year medical students were able to use the 6 Ps framework and pocket card after a brief introduction, endorsing new learning and demonstrating significant gains in knowledge and self-assessed confidence. Medical educators across schools may consider adopting this novel tool and approach to introduce or support student learning about PC.