肝移植的碳足迹和能量消耗。

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928
Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore
{"title":"肝移植的碳足迹和能量消耗。","authors":"Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (<i>t</i> = 29.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (<i>t</i> = 13.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (<i>t</i> = 11.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), platelets (<i>t</i> = 8.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (<i>t</i> = 3.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"3 ","pages":"1441928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon footprint and energy consumption of liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (<i>t</i> = 29.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (<i>t</i> = 13.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (<i>t</i> = 11.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), platelets (<i>t</i> = 8.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (<i>t</i> = 3.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1441928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:人们对外科手术对环境的影响越来越感兴趣,但还需要更多关于肝移植的信息。本研究旨在量化与脑死亡后供体全尺寸肝移植相关的温室气体排放总量或碳足迹,包括相关的背台式移植准备。方法:采用自下而上的方法回顾性计算碳足迹。这种方法计算了每次移植的能耗(kWh)、挥发性麻醉剂(ml)、固体废物(kg)和输血的血制品单位。使用经过验证的转换因子将这些消耗值转换为释放到环境中的二氧化碳当量质量(kg CO2e)。结果:共分析了2021 - 2022年间接受肝移植的147例患者,平均年龄55岁(男性,78.9%),共产生45.5吨CO2e。每个过程的平均(SD)碳足迹为309.8 (33.2)kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4;315.3]。总能源消耗为96.5兆瓦,占温室气体排放量的65.4%(29.8吨二氧化碳当量),而挥发性麻醉剂、固体废物和血液制品输血分别占8.0%(3.64吨二氧化碳当量)、5.9%(2.7吨二氧化碳当量)和20.6%(9.4吨二氧化碳当量)。手术时间(t = 29.0;p t = 13.1;p t = 11.1;p t = 8.9;p t = 3.6;结论:肝移植需要大量的能量,并与相当大的温室气体排放相关,特别是在较长的手术过程中。移植临床医生、医院管理人员、政策制定者和患者应该意识到肝移植对环境的影响,并合作采用可持续的能源实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The carbon footprint and energy consumption of liver transplantation.

Background and aims: There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.

Methods: The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).

Results: A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (t = 29.0; p < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (t = 13.1; p < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (t = 11.1; p < 0.001), platelets (t = 8.9; p < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (t = 3.6; p < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Conclusions: Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunomodulation by allograft endothelial cells. Demise of cadaveric islet transplantation in the USA: Quo Vadis, 1 year after BLA approval and 24 years after the Edmonton breakthrough? Discovery of conserved peptide-MHC epitopes for directly alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Ronald W. Busuttil, M.D., Ph.D.- TTS 2024 Medawar Prize Laureate. Case Report: Management of a case of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a second-kidney transplant patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1