Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore
{"title":"肝移植的碳足迹和能量消耗。","authors":"Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (<i>t</i> = 29.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (<i>t</i> = 13.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (<i>t</i> = 11.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), platelets (<i>t</i> = 8.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (<i>t</i> = 3.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"3 ","pages":"1441928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon footprint and energy consumption of liver transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo De Simone, Quirino Lai, Juri Ducci, Daniela Campani, Giandomenico Biancofiore\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (<i>t</i> = 29.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (<i>t</i> = 13.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (<i>t</i> = 11.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), platelets (<i>t</i> = 8.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (<i>t</i> = 3.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1441928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:人们对外科手术对环境的影响越来越感兴趣,但还需要更多关于肝移植的信息。本研究旨在量化与脑死亡后供体全尺寸肝移植相关的温室气体排放总量或碳足迹,包括相关的背台式移植准备。方法:采用自下而上的方法回顾性计算碳足迹。这种方法计算了每次移植的能耗(kWh)、挥发性麻醉剂(ml)、固体废物(kg)和输血的血制品单位。使用经过验证的转换因子将这些消耗值转换为释放到环境中的二氧化碳当量质量(kg CO2e)。结果:共分析了2021 - 2022年间接受肝移植的147例患者,平均年龄55岁(男性,78.9%),共产生45.5吨CO2e。每个过程的平均(SD)碳足迹为309.8 (33.2)kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4;315.3]。总能源消耗为96.5兆瓦,占温室气体排放量的65.4%(29.8吨二氧化碳当量),而挥发性麻醉剂、固体废物和血液制品输血分别占8.0%(3.64吨二氧化碳当量)、5.9%(2.7吨二氧化碳当量)和20.6%(9.4吨二氧化碳当量)。手术时间(t = 29.0;p t = 13.1;p t = 11.1;p t = 8.9;p t = 3.6;结论:肝移植需要大量的能量,并与相当大的温室气体排放相关,特别是在较长的手术过程中。移植临床医生、医院管理人员、政策制定者和患者应该意识到肝移植对环境的影响,并合作采用可持续的能源实践。
The carbon footprint and energy consumption of liver transplantation.
Background and aims: There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.
Methods: The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).
Results: A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery (t = 29.0; p < 0.001), transfused red blood cells (t = 13.1; p < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma (t = 11.1; p < 0.001), platelets (t = 8.9; p < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine (t = 3.6; p < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.
Conclusions: Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.