A. Abougazia, J. York, G. Erdelyi, S. Aryasomayajula, A. Evans
{"title":"高超微血管成像血管指数在乳腺实性病变中的再现性及诊断价值。","authors":"A. Abougazia, J. York, G. Erdelyi, S. Aryasomayajula, A. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a new ultrasound tool that can detect small blood vessels while cancelling out artefacts. It may be useful in detecting the vascularity associated with malignant breast lesions. This study evaluated the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI's Vascular Index (VI) in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Solid breast lesions were prospectively assessed by two observers before core biopsy. Each lesion was given BIRADS score, and SMI VI was measured. The reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>121 lesions in 115 patients were assessed, of which 53 were malignant and 68 benign. The ICC for SMI VI readings was 0.72. The SMI VI AUROC was 0.61, the sensitivity was 90.4%, specificity of 31.9%, PPV of 50% and NPV of 81.5%. The BIRADS scores in all lesions had an AUROC of 0.78, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 55.1%, PPV of 62.7%, and NPV of 100%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first study to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in a European population. We have shown that SMI VI is poor at differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, and therefore reproducibility is irrelevant in this context. Future studies may find other uses for SMI's depiction of lesion vascularity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106773"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of superb microvascular Imaging's vascular index in solid breast lesions\",\"authors\":\"A. Abougazia, J. York, G. Erdelyi, S. Aryasomayajula, A. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a new ultrasound tool that can detect small blood vessels while cancelling out artefacts. It may be useful in detecting the vascularity associated with malignant breast lesions. This study evaluated the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI's Vascular Index (VI) in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Solid breast lesions were prospectively assessed by two observers before core biopsy. Each lesion was given BIRADS score, and SMI VI was measured. The reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>121 lesions in 115 patients were assessed, of which 53 were malignant and 68 benign. The ICC for SMI VI readings was 0.72. The SMI VI AUROC was 0.61, the sensitivity was 90.4%, specificity of 31.9%, PPV of 50% and NPV of 81.5%. The BIRADS scores in all lesions had an AUROC of 0.78, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 55.1%, PPV of 62.7%, and NPV of 100%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first study to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in a European population. We have shown that SMI VI is poor at differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, and therefore reproducibility is irrelevant in this context. Future studies may find other uses for SMI's depiction of lesion vascularity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006603\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:超细微血管成像(SMI)是一种新型的超声工具,可以在消除伪影的同时发现小血管。它可能有助于检测与乳腺恶性病变相关的血管。本研究评估SMI血管指数(VI)在鉴别乳腺良恶性实体病变中的可重复性和诊断性能。材料和方法:乳房实性病变在核心活检前由两名观察员前瞻性评估。每个病变给予BIRADS评分,并测量SMI VI。采用类内相关系数(ICC)、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评价SMI VI的可重复性和诊断效能。结果:115例患者共检查121个病灶,其中恶性53个,良性68个。SMI VI读数的ICC为0.72。SMI VI AUROC为0.61,敏感性90.4%,特异性31.9%,PPV为50%,NPV为81.5%。BIRADS评分在所有病变中的AUROC为0.78,敏感性为100%,特异性为55.1%,PPV为62.7%,NPV为100%。结论:这是第一项评估欧洲人群中SMI VI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的可重复性和诊断性能的研究。我们已经表明SMI VI在区分乳腺良性和恶性病变方面很差,因此在这种情况下可重复性是无关的。未来的研究可能会发现SMI对病变血管分布的描述的其他用途。
Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of superb microvascular Imaging's vascular index in solid breast lesions
Aim
Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) is a new ultrasound tool that can detect small blood vessels while cancelling out artefacts. It may be useful in detecting the vascularity associated with malignant breast lesions. This study evaluated the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI's Vascular Index (VI) in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions.
Materials and methods
Solid breast lesions were prospectively assessed by two observers before core biopsy. Each lesion was given BIRADS score, and SMI VI was measured. The reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Results
121 lesions in 115 patients were assessed, of which 53 were malignant and 68 benign. The ICC for SMI VI readings was 0.72. The SMI VI AUROC was 0.61, the sensitivity was 90.4%, specificity of 31.9%, PPV of 50% and NPV of 81.5%. The BIRADS scores in all lesions had an AUROC of 0.78, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 55.1%, PPV of 62.7%, and NPV of 100%.
Conclusion
This is the first study to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic performance of SMI VI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in a European population. We have shown that SMI VI is poor at differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, and therefore reproducibility is irrelevant in this context. Future studies may find other uses for SMI's depiction of lesion vascularity.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including:
• Computed tomography
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Ultrasonography
• Digital radiology
• Interventional radiology
• Radiography
• Nuclear medicine
Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.