肩袖撕裂与肩部MRI参数的关系:在冠状位肩肱间隙测量中关节镜验证的重要性。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241309695
Gokhan Ilyas, Fikri Burak Ipci, Ercument Egeli, Onder Kalenderer
{"title":"肩袖撕裂与肩部MRI参数的关系:在冠状位肩肱间隙测量中关节镜验证的重要性。","authors":"Gokhan Ilyas, Fikri Burak Ipci, Ercument Egeli, Onder Kalenderer","doi":"10.1177/23259671241309695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement parameters-the standard noninvasive diagnostic method for rotator cuff tears (RCTs)-have been used to compare groups with and without RCTs. Arthroscopy is used in definitive diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To evaluate the association between RCT and shoulder angles and distances on MRI in patients with and without arthroscopically validated RCT and to determine whether the degree of rotator cuff fatty degeneration affects the MRI measurements.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Shoulder measurements on MRI were compared between patients with and without RCT as confirmed by shoulder arthroscopy performed by a single surgeon between 2019 and 2024, and non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. Interobserver reliability (Fleiss kappa coefficient) was calculated for the measurements. The groups were compared using the independent <i>t</i> test or the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. The RCT group was further divided according to the level of fatty degeneration (Goutallier types 0-1-2 vs types 3-4) for subanalysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to the 368 RCT and 55 non-RCT patients with arthroscopic confirmation, there were 92 non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. The sagittal acromiohumeral interval (AHI) (8.32 vs 9.24 mm), coronal AHI (7.87 vs 8.96 mm), and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratio (22.63% vs 24.88%) were significantly lower in the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> < .001, and <i>P</i> = .001, respectively). In contrast, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) (33.17° vs 31.92°) and the glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratio (57.52% vs 55.7%) were significantly higher in the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> = .037 and <i>P</i> = .017, respectively). Higher rotator cuff fatty degeneration levels (Goutallier types 3-4) further increased these differences within the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> < .001 for all). When the arthroscopically validated and nonvalidated non-RCT patients were compared, coronal AHI and AHI/glenoid height ratio values were found to be significantly lower in the nonvalidated group (<i>P</i> = .034 and <i>P</i> = .047, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, RCT was associated with decreased sagittal AHI, coronal AHI, and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratios and increased CSA and glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23259671241309695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Rotator Cuff Tears and Shoulder MRI Parameters: Importance of Arthroscopic Validation in Coronal Acromiohumeral Interval Measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Gokhan Ilyas, Fikri Burak Ipci, Ercument Egeli, Onder Kalenderer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671241309695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement parameters-the standard noninvasive diagnostic method for rotator cuff tears (RCTs)-have been used to compare groups with and without RCTs. Arthroscopy is used in definitive diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To evaluate the association between RCT and shoulder angles and distances on MRI in patients with and without arthroscopically validated RCT and to determine whether the degree of rotator cuff fatty degeneration affects the MRI measurements.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Shoulder measurements on MRI were compared between patients with and without RCT as confirmed by shoulder arthroscopy performed by a single surgeon between 2019 and 2024, and non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. Interobserver reliability (Fleiss kappa coefficient) was calculated for the measurements. The groups were compared using the independent <i>t</i> test or the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. The RCT group was further divided according to the level of fatty degeneration (Goutallier types 0-1-2 vs types 3-4) for subanalysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to the 368 RCT and 55 non-RCT patients with arthroscopic confirmation, there were 92 non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. The sagittal acromiohumeral interval (AHI) (8.32 vs 9.24 mm), coronal AHI (7.87 vs 8.96 mm), and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratio (22.63% vs 24.88%) were significantly lower in the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> < .001, and <i>P</i> = .001, respectively). In contrast, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) (33.17° vs 31.92°) and the glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratio (57.52% vs 55.7%) were significantly higher in the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> = .037 and <i>P</i> = .017, respectively). Higher rotator cuff fatty degeneration levels (Goutallier types 3-4) further increased these differences within the patients with RCT (<i>P</i> < .001 for all). When the arthroscopically validated and nonvalidated non-RCT patients were compared, coronal AHI and AHI/glenoid height ratio values were found to be significantly lower in the nonvalidated group (<i>P</i> = .034 and <i>P</i> = .047, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, RCT was associated with decreased sagittal AHI, coronal AHI, and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratios and increased CSA and glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"23259671241309695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241309695\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241309695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:磁共振成像(MRI)测量参数——肩袖撕裂(rct)的标准无创诊断方法——已被用于比较有和没有rct的组。关节镜检查用于明确的诊断和治疗。目的:评估RCT与肩关节角度和MRI距离之间的关系,并确定肩袖脂肪变性程度是否影响MRI测量。研究设计:横断面研究;证据水平,3。方法:比较2019年至2024年间由单一外科医生进行肩关节镜检查确认的有RCT和没有RCT的患者,以及没有关节镜检查确认的非RCT患者的MRI肩部测量。计算了测量结果的观察者间信度(Fleiss kappa系数)。组间比较采用独立t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。RCT组根据脂肪变性程度进一步划分(Goutallier型0-1-2 vs型3-4)进行亚分析。结果:除368例RCT患者和55例非RCT患者经关节镜确认外,92例非RCT患者未经关节镜确认。矢状位肩肱间隔(AHI) (8.32 vs 9.24 mm)、冠状位AHI (7.87 vs 8.96 mm)、冠状位AHI/盂高比(22.63% vs 24.88%)在RCT组均显著降低(P < 0.001、P < 0.001、P = 0.001)。相比之下,RCT患者的临界肩关节角(CSA)(33.17°vs 31.92°)和肩关节宽度/肱骨头覆盖率(57.52% vs 55.7%)显著高于RCT患者(P = 0.037和P = 0.017)。较高的肩袖脂肪变性水平(Goutallier型3-4)在RCT患者中进一步增加了这些差异(P < 0.001)。将经关节镜验证的患者与未经验证的非rct患者进行比较,发现未经验证组冠状动脉AHI和AHI/关节盂高度比值值显著低于未经验证组(P = 0.034和P = 0.047)。结论:在本研究中,RCT与矢状面AHI、冠状面AHI和冠状面AHI/肩胛高度比值的降低以及CSA和肩胛宽度/肱骨头覆盖率的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Rotator Cuff Tears and Shoulder MRI Parameters: Importance of Arthroscopic Validation in Coronal Acromiohumeral Interval Measurement.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement parameters-the standard noninvasive diagnostic method for rotator cuff tears (RCTs)-have been used to compare groups with and without RCTs. Arthroscopy is used in definitive diagnosis and treatment.

Purposes: To evaluate the association between RCT and shoulder angles and distances on MRI in patients with and without arthroscopically validated RCT and to determine whether the degree of rotator cuff fatty degeneration affects the MRI measurements.

Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Shoulder measurements on MRI were compared between patients with and without RCT as confirmed by shoulder arthroscopy performed by a single surgeon between 2019 and 2024, and non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. Interobserver reliability (Fleiss kappa coefficient) was calculated for the measurements. The groups were compared using the independent t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. The RCT group was further divided according to the level of fatty degeneration (Goutallier types 0-1-2 vs types 3-4) for subanalysis.

Results: In addition to the 368 RCT and 55 non-RCT patients with arthroscopic confirmation, there were 92 non-RCT patients without arthroscopic confirmation. The sagittal acromiohumeral interval (AHI) (8.32 vs 9.24 mm), coronal AHI (7.87 vs 8.96 mm), and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratio (22.63% vs 24.88%) were significantly lower in the patients with RCT (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .001, respectively). In contrast, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) (33.17° vs 31.92°) and the glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratio (57.52% vs 55.7%) were significantly higher in the patients with RCT (P = .037 and P = .017, respectively). Higher rotator cuff fatty degeneration levels (Goutallier types 3-4) further increased these differences within the patients with RCT (P < .001 for all). When the arthroscopically validated and nonvalidated non-RCT patients were compared, coronal AHI and AHI/glenoid height ratio values were found to be significantly lower in the nonvalidated group (P = .034 and P = .047, respectively).

Conclusion: In this study, RCT was associated with decreased sagittal AHI, coronal AHI, and coronal AHI/glenoid height ratios and increased CSA and glenoid width/humeral head coverage ratios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A Multisequence Approach to PIN Neuropathy: Bridging Imaging and Talent Development: Letter to the Editor. Disparities in Evidence and Media Portrayal of Injectable Orthobiologics for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials and News Media. Synovial Fluid Biomarkers Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Quantifying Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Resilience: A Screening and Composite Score Framework. Biomechanical Comparison of Native Acetabular Labrum, Fresh-Frozen Meniscus, and Fresh-Frozen Anterior Tibialis Tendon for Labral Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1