评估1型神经纤维瘤病患者合并症预测模型的降维性

IF 4.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae157
Aditi Gupta, Ethan Hillis, Inez Y Oh, Stephanie M Morris, Zach Abrams, Randi E Foraker, David H Gutmann, Philip R O Payne
{"title":"评估1型神经纤维瘤病患者合并症预测模型的降维性","authors":"Aditi Gupta, Ethan Hillis, Inez Y Oh, Stephanie M Morris, Zach Abrams, Randi E Foraker, David H Gutmann, Philip R O Payne","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dimensionality reduction techniques aim to enhance the performance of machine learning (ML) models by reducing noise and mitigating overfitting. We sought to compare the effect of different dimensionality reduction methods for comorbidity features extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) on the performance of ML models for predicting the development of various sub-phenotypes in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>EHR-derived data from pediatric subjects with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of NF1 were used to create 10 unique comorbidities code-derived feature sets by incorporating dimensionality reduction techniques using raw International Classification of Diseases codes, Clinical Classifications Software Refined, and Phecode mapping schemes. We compared the performance of logistic regression, XGBoost, and random forest models utilizing each feature set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>XGBoost-based predictive models were most successful at predicting NF1 sub-phenotypes. Overall, features based on domain knowledge-informed mapping schema performed better than unsupervised feature reduction methods. High-level features exhibited the worst performance across models and outcomes, suggesting excessive information loss with over-aggregation of features.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Model performance is significantly impacted by dimensionality reduction techniques and varies by specific ML algorithm and outcome being predicted. Automated methods using existing knowledge and ontology databases can effectively aggregate features extracted from EHRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dimensionality reduction through feature aggregation can enhance the performance of ML models, particularly in high-dimensional datasets with small sample sizes, commonly found in EHRs health applications. However, if not carefully optimized, it can lead to information loss and data oversimplification, potentially adversely affecting model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"ooae157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating dimensionality reduction of comorbidities for predictive modeling in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1.\",\"authors\":\"Aditi Gupta, Ethan Hillis, Inez Y Oh, Stephanie M Morris, Zach Abrams, Randi E Foraker, David H Gutmann, Philip R O Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dimensionality reduction techniques aim to enhance the performance of machine learning (ML) models by reducing noise and mitigating overfitting. We sought to compare the effect of different dimensionality reduction methods for comorbidity features extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) on the performance of ML models for predicting the development of various sub-phenotypes in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>EHR-derived data from pediatric subjects with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of NF1 were used to create 10 unique comorbidities code-derived feature sets by incorporating dimensionality reduction techniques using raw International Classification of Diseases codes, Clinical Classifications Software Refined, and Phecode mapping schemes. We compared the performance of logistic regression, XGBoost, and random forest models utilizing each feature set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>XGBoost-based predictive models were most successful at predicting NF1 sub-phenotypes. Overall, features based on domain knowledge-informed mapping schema performed better than unsupervised feature reduction methods. High-level features exhibited the worst performance across models and outcomes, suggesting excessive information loss with over-aggregation of features.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Model performance is significantly impacted by dimensionality reduction techniques and varies by specific ML algorithm and outcome being predicted. Automated methods using existing knowledge and ontology databases can effectively aggregate features extracted from EHRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dimensionality reduction through feature aggregation can enhance the performance of ML models, particularly in high-dimensional datasets with small sample sizes, commonly found in EHRs health applications. However, if not carefully optimized, it can lead to information loss and data oversimplification, potentially adversely affecting model performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"ooae157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752863/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:降维技术旨在通过降低噪声和缓解过拟合来提高机器学习(ML)模型的性能。我们试图比较从电子健康记录(EHRs)中提取的共病特征的不同降维方法对ML模型预测1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)儿童各种亚表型发展的影响。材料和方法:使用临床确诊为NF1的儿童受试者的电子病历数据,通过使用原始国际疾病分类代码、临床分类软件精制和Phecode制图方案,结合降维技术,创建10个独特的共病代码衍生特征集。我们比较了利用每个特征集的逻辑回归、XGBoost和随机森林模型的性能。结果:基于xgboost的预测模型在预测NF1亚表型方面最为成功。总体而言,基于领域知识的映射模式的特征表现优于无监督的特征约简方法。高级特征在模型和结果中表现最差,表明过度聚集特征导致了过多的信息丢失。讨论:模型性能受到降维技术的显著影响,并因特定的ML算法和预测的结果而异。利用现有知识和本体数据库的自动化方法可以有效地聚合从电子病历中提取的特征。结论:通过特征聚合进行降维可以增强ML模型的性能,特别是在电子病历健康应用中常见的小样本量高维数据集中。然而,如果不仔细优化,它可能导致信息丢失和数据过度简化,从而潜在地对模型性能产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating dimensionality reduction of comorbidities for predictive modeling in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Objective: Dimensionality reduction techniques aim to enhance the performance of machine learning (ML) models by reducing noise and mitigating overfitting. We sought to compare the effect of different dimensionality reduction methods for comorbidity features extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) on the performance of ML models for predicting the development of various sub-phenotypes in children with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

Materials and methods: EHR-derived data from pediatric subjects with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of NF1 were used to create 10 unique comorbidities code-derived feature sets by incorporating dimensionality reduction techniques using raw International Classification of Diseases codes, Clinical Classifications Software Refined, and Phecode mapping schemes. We compared the performance of logistic regression, XGBoost, and random forest models utilizing each feature set.

Results: XGBoost-based predictive models were most successful at predicting NF1 sub-phenotypes. Overall, features based on domain knowledge-informed mapping schema performed better than unsupervised feature reduction methods. High-level features exhibited the worst performance across models and outcomes, suggesting excessive information loss with over-aggregation of features.

Discussion: Model performance is significantly impacted by dimensionality reduction techniques and varies by specific ML algorithm and outcome being predicted. Automated methods using existing knowledge and ontology databases can effectively aggregate features extracted from EHRs.

Conclusion: Dimensionality reduction through feature aggregation can enhance the performance of ML models, particularly in high-dimensional datasets with small sample sizes, commonly found in EHRs health applications. However, if not carefully optimized, it can lead to information loss and data oversimplification, potentially adversely affecting model performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
DataAtlas: automatic generation of data dictionaries using large language models. Generative artificial intelligence implementation in REDCap. Improving readability of layperson abstracts and summaries in oncology using task-specific large language model powered tool: results from the BRIDGE-AI 7 study. Accuracy of administrative data in ascertaining health conditions: a systematic review. An examination of the availability and characteristics of social needs data in the electronic health records: a path to social data harmonization and standardization at Johns Hopkins medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1