通过深度学习加速子宫MRI中梯度回声获取提高图像质量:首次应用于女性骨盆。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.021
Daniel Hausmann MD , Antonio Marketin MD , Roman Rotzinger MD , Jakob Heimer MD , Dominik Nickel PhD , Elisabeth Weiland PhD , Rahel A. Kubik-Huch MD
{"title":"通过深度学习加速子宫MRI中梯度回声获取提高图像质量:首次应用于女性骨盆。","authors":"Daniel Hausmann MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Marketin MD ,&nbsp;Roman Rotzinger MD ,&nbsp;Jakob Heimer MD ,&nbsp;Dominik Nickel PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Weiland PhD ,&nbsp;Rahel A. Kubik-Huch MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of a deep learning (DL)-accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence with a standard (ST) VIBE sequence in assessing the uterus.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Between April and December 2023, a total of 61 female patients (aged 41 ± 14 years) who were referred for an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis were included in this prospective study, after providing informed consent. All examinations were performed with a 1.5 T MRI scanner. The DL VIBE and ST VIBE were acquired before (noncontrast [NC]) and after (contrast-enhanced [CE]) contrast administration in the sagittal orientation. Three readers independently evaluated the following aspects of the images’ quality using 4-point Likert scales (1 = nondiagnostic; 4 = excellent): global image quality, anatomy delineation, and lesion detection/demarcation. Motion artifacts and noise were also assessed (1 = no artifacts; 4 = severe artifacts). In addition, all three readers selected their preferred sequence and the sequence in which they had the highest diagnostic confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After exclusions, the data for 54 patients were analyzed. The DL VIBE was preferred by all three readers in almost all cases (NC: 99%; CE: 96%) and rated highest for diagnostic confidence (NC: 98%; CE: 90%). The image quality of the DL VIBE was rated statistically significantly better than that of the ST VIBE, with simultaneously reduced noise and motion artifacts (p &lt; 0.01). The image quality of the DL VIBE was predominantly rated with a score of 4 (NC: 54%; CE: 78%), while the image quality of the ST VIBE was mostly rated with a score of 3 (NC: 53%; CE: 80%). The anatomy of the female pelvis was significantly better delineated by the DL VIBE (p &lt; 0.01; log[OR] = 5.3; 95% CI: 3.7–6.8), and lesions were more clearly demarcated (p &lt; 0.01; log[OR] = 6.7; 95% CI: 4.5–8.8).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The DL VIBE sequence showed a significant overall improvement in all image quality characteristics for all readers and was preferred in most cases. The clinical implementation of DL VIBE in MRI of the female pelvis could improve the diagnostic value of the examination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 5","pages":"Pages 2776-2786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Image Quality Through Deep Learning Acceleration of Gradient-Echo Acquisitions in Uterine MRI: First Application with the Female Pelvis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hausmann MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Marketin MD ,&nbsp;Roman Rotzinger MD ,&nbsp;Jakob Heimer MD ,&nbsp;Dominik Nickel PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Weiland PhD ,&nbsp;Rahel A. Kubik-Huch MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of a deep learning (DL)-accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence with a standard (ST) VIBE sequence in assessing the uterus.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Between April and December 2023, a total of 61 female patients (aged 41 ± 14 years) who were referred for an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis were included in this prospective study, after providing informed consent. All examinations were performed with a 1.5 T MRI scanner. The DL VIBE and ST VIBE were acquired before (noncontrast [NC]) and after (contrast-enhanced [CE]) contrast administration in the sagittal orientation. Three readers independently evaluated the following aspects of the images’ quality using 4-point Likert scales (1 = nondiagnostic; 4 = excellent): global image quality, anatomy delineation, and lesion detection/demarcation. Motion artifacts and noise were also assessed (1 = no artifacts; 4 = severe artifacts). In addition, all three readers selected their preferred sequence and the sequence in which they had the highest diagnostic confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After exclusions, the data for 54 patients were analyzed. The DL VIBE was preferred by all three readers in almost all cases (NC: 99%; CE: 96%) and rated highest for diagnostic confidence (NC: 98%; CE: 90%). The image quality of the DL VIBE was rated statistically significantly better than that of the ST VIBE, with simultaneously reduced noise and motion artifacts (p &lt; 0.01). The image quality of the DL VIBE was predominantly rated with a score of 4 (NC: 54%; CE: 78%), while the image quality of the ST VIBE was mostly rated with a score of 3 (NC: 53%; CE: 80%). The anatomy of the female pelvis was significantly better delineated by the DL VIBE (p &lt; 0.01; log[OR] = 5.3; 95% CI: 3.7–6.8), and lesions were more clearly demarcated (p &lt; 0.01; log[OR] = 6.7; 95% CI: 4.5–8.8).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The DL VIBE sequence showed a significant overall improvement in all image quality characteristics for all readers and was preferred in most cases. The clinical implementation of DL VIBE in MRI of the female pelvis could improve the diagnostic value of the examination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2776-2786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224009905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224009905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目的:本研究的目的是比较深度学习(DL)加速容积内插式屏气检查(VIBE)序列与标准(ST) VIBE序列在评估子宫时的图像质量。材料与方法:在知情同意的情况下,于2023年4月至12月期间,61例骨盆磁共振成像(MRI)女性患者(年龄41±14岁)被纳入本前瞻性研究。所有检查均通过1.5 T MRI扫描仪进行。在矢状面造影前(无对比[NC])和后(增强对比[CE])分别获取DL VIBE和ST VIBE。三位读者使用4点李克特量表独立评估图像质量的以下方面(1 =非诊断;4 =优秀):整体图像质量,解剖描绘,病变检测/划分。还评估了运动伪影和噪声(1 =无伪影;4 =严重的工件)。此外,所有三位读者都选择了他们喜欢的序列和他们有最高诊断信心的序列。结果:排除后,对54例患者的资料进行了分析。在几乎所有情况下,三位读者都更喜欢DL VIBE (NC: 99%;CE: 96%)并被评为诊断置信度最高(NC: 98%;CE: 90%)。DL VIBE的图像质量在统计学上显著优于ST VIBE,同时降低了噪声和运动伪影(p < 0.01)。DL VIBE的图像质量主要评价为4分(NC: 54%;CE: 78%),而ST VIBE的图像质量大多被评为3分(NC: 53%;CE: 80%)。DL VIBE能更好地描绘女性骨盆的解剖结构(p < 0.01;log[OR] = 5.3;95% CI: 3.7-6.8),病变界限更清晰(p < 0.01;log[OR] = 6.7;95% ci: 4.5-8.8)。结论:DL VIBE序列在所有读取器的所有图像质量特征上都有显著的整体改善,在大多数情况下是首选的。临床应用DL VIBE对女性骨盆MRI检查,可提高检查的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Image Quality Through Deep Learning Acceleration of Gradient-Echo Acquisitions in Uterine MRI: First Application with the Female Pelvis

Rationale and Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of a deep learning (DL)-accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence with a standard (ST) VIBE sequence in assessing the uterus.

Materials and methods

Between April and December 2023, a total of 61 female patients (aged 41 ± 14 years) who were referred for an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis were included in this prospective study, after providing informed consent. All examinations were performed with a 1.5 T MRI scanner. The DL VIBE and ST VIBE were acquired before (noncontrast [NC]) and after (contrast-enhanced [CE]) contrast administration in the sagittal orientation. Three readers independently evaluated the following aspects of the images’ quality using 4-point Likert scales (1 = nondiagnostic; 4 = excellent): global image quality, anatomy delineation, and lesion detection/demarcation. Motion artifacts and noise were also assessed (1 = no artifacts; 4 = severe artifacts). In addition, all three readers selected their preferred sequence and the sequence in which they had the highest diagnostic confidence.

Results

After exclusions, the data for 54 patients were analyzed. The DL VIBE was preferred by all three readers in almost all cases (NC: 99%; CE: 96%) and rated highest for diagnostic confidence (NC: 98%; CE: 90%). The image quality of the DL VIBE was rated statistically significantly better than that of the ST VIBE, with simultaneously reduced noise and motion artifacts (p < 0.01). The image quality of the DL VIBE was predominantly rated with a score of 4 (NC: 54%; CE: 78%), while the image quality of the ST VIBE was mostly rated with a score of 3 (NC: 53%; CE: 80%). The anatomy of the female pelvis was significantly better delineated by the DL VIBE (p < 0.01; log[OR] = 5.3; 95% CI: 3.7–6.8), and lesions were more clearly demarcated (p < 0.01; log[OR] = 6.7; 95% CI: 4.5–8.8).

Conclusion

The DL VIBE sequence showed a significant overall improvement in all image quality characteristics for all readers and was preferred in most cases. The clinical implementation of DL VIBE in MRI of the female pelvis could improve the diagnostic value of the examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
The Vital Distinction Between Behavior and Character in Radiology Education Noninvasive Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Autoimmune Liver Disease Using Deep Learning Beyond the Trade-Off: Achieving High Spatial and Temporal Resolution in Breast DCE-MRI Using a Novel 4D Stack-of-Stars Sequence Intratumoral and Peritumoral Habitat Radiomics on Multiparametric MRI for Preoperative Prediction of 1-Year Progression-Free Survival Status in Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Study Diagnostic Performance of Microstructural Parameters Derived From Time-dependent Diffusion MRI for Grading Meningiomas: A Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1