成人非心脏手术的术前主观功能能力和术后结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-11 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/anae.16543
Kyosuke Takahashi, Kyoko Chiba, Ayano Honda, Yusuke Iizuka, Koichi Yoshinaga, Alka Sachin Deo, Tokujiro Uchida
{"title":"成人非心脏手术的术前主观功能能力和术后结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Kyosuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Kyoko Chiba,&nbsp;Ayano Honda,&nbsp;Yusuke Iizuka,&nbsp;Koichi Yoshinaga,&nbsp;Alka Sachin Deo,&nbsp;Tokujiro Uchida","doi":"10.1111/anae.16543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Assessment of functional capacity is an essential part of peri-operative risk stratification. Subjective functional capacity is easier to examine than objective tests of patient fitness. However, the association between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes has not been established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four databases were searched for studies describing the associations between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted among studies where functional capacity was expressed in metabolic equivalents. The primary outcome was postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative overall complications. We estimated the ORs of the outcomes in patients with poor functional capacity (&lt; 4 metabolic equivalents) as compared with those with good functional capacity (≥ 4 metabolic equivalents). Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 7835 abstracts. After screening and a full-text review, 23 studies were selected. Evaluation methods of functional capacity included: questionnaires (n = 7); specific questions (n = 6); and subjective assessment by anaesthetists (n = 5). The probability of major postoperative adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with poor functional capacity (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.62–2.08) than in those with good functional capacity. Patients with poor functional capacity also had higher odds of mortality (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.45–4.25) and postoperative complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.34–2.55).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Subjective functional capacity of &lt; 4 metabolic equivalents was associated with postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and other serious outcomes. The results need to be interpreted with caution due to the diverse measures used to assess functional capacity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 5","pages":"561-571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-operative subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adult non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kyosuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Kyoko Chiba,&nbsp;Ayano Honda,&nbsp;Yusuke Iizuka,&nbsp;Koichi Yoshinaga,&nbsp;Alka Sachin Deo,&nbsp;Tokujiro Uchida\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Assessment of functional capacity is an essential part of peri-operative risk stratification. Subjective functional capacity is easier to examine than objective tests of patient fitness. However, the association between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes has not been established.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four databases were searched for studies describing the associations between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted among studies where functional capacity was expressed in metabolic equivalents. The primary outcome was postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative overall complications. We estimated the ORs of the outcomes in patients with poor functional capacity (&lt; 4 metabolic equivalents) as compared with those with good functional capacity (≥ 4 metabolic equivalents). Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified 7835 abstracts. After screening and a full-text review, 23 studies were selected. Evaluation methods of functional capacity included: questionnaires (n = 7); specific questions (n = 6); and subjective assessment by anaesthetists (n = 5). The probability of major postoperative adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with poor functional capacity (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.62–2.08) than in those with good functional capacity. Patients with poor functional capacity also had higher odds of mortality (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.45–4.25) and postoperative complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.34–2.55).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Subjective functional capacity of &lt; 4 metabolic equivalents was associated with postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and other serious outcomes. The results need to be interpreted with caution due to the diverse measures used to assess functional capacity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"80 5\",\"pages\":\"561-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16543\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能能力评估是围手术期风险分层的重要组成部分。主观的功能能力比客观的病人体能测试更容易检查。然而,主观功能能力与术后预后之间的关系尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-operative subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adult non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Assessment of functional capacity is an essential part of peri-operative risk stratification. Subjective functional capacity is easier to examine than objective tests of patient fitness. However, the association between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes has not been established.

Methods

Four databases were searched for studies describing the associations between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted among studies where functional capacity was expressed in metabolic equivalents. The primary outcome was postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative overall complications. We estimated the ORs of the outcomes in patients with poor functional capacity (< 4 metabolic equivalents) as compared with those with good functional capacity (≥ 4 metabolic equivalents). Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 7835 abstracts. After screening and a full-text review, 23 studies were selected. Evaluation methods of functional capacity included: questionnaires (n = 7); specific questions (n = 6); and subjective assessment by anaesthetists (n = 5). The probability of major postoperative adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with poor functional capacity (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.62–2.08) than in those with good functional capacity. Patients with poor functional capacity also had higher odds of mortality (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.45–4.25) and postoperative complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.34–2.55).

Discussion

Subjective functional capacity of < 4 metabolic equivalents was associated with postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and other serious outcomes. The results need to be interpreted with caution due to the diverse measures used to assess functional capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Access to videolaryngoscopy: who holds the risk? Body mass index and postoperative independence: a reply. Revisiting the role of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in total hip arthroplasty analgesia. Levelling up peri-operative practice: measuring operating table tilt. Interpectoral and serratus anterior plane blocks in mastectomy: unravelling the disconnect between acute and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1