评估传输层拥塞控制算法:一个综合调查

IF 50.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1109/COMST.2025.3533303
Christian L. Vielhaus;Caspar von Lengerke;Vincent Latzko;Justus Rischke;Martin Reisslein;Frank H. P. Fitzek
{"title":"评估传输层拥塞控制算法:一个综合调查","authors":"Christian L. Vielhaus;Caspar von Lengerke;Vincent Latzko;Justus Rischke;Martin Reisslein;Frank H. P. Fitzek","doi":"10.1109/COMST.2025.3533303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congestion Control (CC) limits the transmission rate of data packets in the transport layer protocol, e.g., in TCP and QUIC, of a sending endpoint so as to mitigate the congestion in packet-switched communication networks. Numerous studies have developed and evaluated Congestion Control Algorithms (CCAs) for a wide range of network types. Prior surveys have covered the functioning of the existing CCAs and their performance characteristics. In contrast, this survey focuses on the quantitative evaluation of CCAs; specifically, we comprehensively survey the CCA evaluation methodologies, i.e., the why and how of CCA evaluations. We define a CCA evaluation as a combination of a prescribed evaluation scenario with prescribed evaluation metrics. In turn, we define an evaluation scenario as a combination of a prescribed network (e.g., path) model and a particular traffic model. We present comprehensive sets of network and traffic model characteristics (i.e., network scenario characteristics) that can influence the performance of CCAs, as well as a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for measuring the performance of CCAs. We taxonomize CCA evaluations into the main categories: Steady-state, transient-state, network variation, dynamic (e.g., wireless) network, and competition evaluations. We place and survey the existing CCA evaluation studies in this taxonomy to uncover the main trends and shortcomings of the CCA evaluation field to date. To facilitate the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs, we have developed the publicly available CCA evaluation framework ccperf, which incorporates the insights from our survey. We also outline future research directions to further advance the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs.","PeriodicalId":55029,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials","volume":"28 ","pages":"278-340"},"PeriodicalIF":50.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Transport Layer Congestion Control Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey\",\"authors\":\"Christian L. Vielhaus;Caspar von Lengerke;Vincent Latzko;Justus Rischke;Martin Reisslein;Frank H. P. Fitzek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMST.2025.3533303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Congestion Control (CC) limits the transmission rate of data packets in the transport layer protocol, e.g., in TCP and QUIC, of a sending endpoint so as to mitigate the congestion in packet-switched communication networks. Numerous studies have developed and evaluated Congestion Control Algorithms (CCAs) for a wide range of network types. Prior surveys have covered the functioning of the existing CCAs and their performance characteristics. In contrast, this survey focuses on the quantitative evaluation of CCAs; specifically, we comprehensively survey the CCA evaluation methodologies, i.e., the why and how of CCA evaluations. We define a CCA evaluation as a combination of a prescribed evaluation scenario with prescribed evaluation metrics. In turn, we define an evaluation scenario as a combination of a prescribed network (e.g., path) model and a particular traffic model. We present comprehensive sets of network and traffic model characteristics (i.e., network scenario characteristics) that can influence the performance of CCAs, as well as a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for measuring the performance of CCAs. We taxonomize CCA evaluations into the main categories: Steady-state, transient-state, network variation, dynamic (e.g., wireless) network, and competition evaluations. We place and survey the existing CCA evaluation studies in this taxonomy to uncover the main trends and shortcomings of the CCA evaluation field to date. To facilitate the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs, we have developed the publicly available CCA evaluation framework ccperf, which incorporates the insights from our survey. We also outline future research directions to further advance the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"278-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10851263/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10851263/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拥塞控制(CC)是限制发送端传输层协议(如TCP和QUIC)中数据包的传输速率,以缓解分组交换通信网络中的拥塞问题。许多研究已经开发并评估了各种网络类型的拥塞控制算法(CCAs)。先前的调查涵盖了现有cca的功能及其性能特征。相比之下,本调查侧重于CCAs的定量评价;具体而言,我们全面考察了CCA评估方法,即为什么要进行CCA评估以及如何进行CCA评估。我们将CCA评估定义为规定的评估场景与规定的评估指标的组合。反过来,我们将评估场景定义为规定的网络(例如,路径)模型和特定流量模型的组合。我们提供了一套全面的网络和流量模型特征(即网络场景特征),可以影响cca的性能,以及一套全面的评估指标,用于测量cca的性能。我们将CCA评估分为主要类别:稳态、瞬态、网络变化、动态(如无线)网络和竞争评估。我们将现有的CCA评估研究放在这一分类中进行调查,以揭示迄今为止CCA评估领域的主要趋势和不足。为了促进对CCA进行全面严格的评估,我们开发了公开可用的CCA评估框架ccperf,其中包含了我们调查的见解。展望了未来的研究方向,以进一步推进CCAs的全面严谨评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Transport Layer Congestion Control Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey
Congestion Control (CC) limits the transmission rate of data packets in the transport layer protocol, e.g., in TCP and QUIC, of a sending endpoint so as to mitigate the congestion in packet-switched communication networks. Numerous studies have developed and evaluated Congestion Control Algorithms (CCAs) for a wide range of network types. Prior surveys have covered the functioning of the existing CCAs and their performance characteristics. In contrast, this survey focuses on the quantitative evaluation of CCAs; specifically, we comprehensively survey the CCA evaluation methodologies, i.e., the why and how of CCA evaluations. We define a CCA evaluation as a combination of a prescribed evaluation scenario with prescribed evaluation metrics. In turn, we define an evaluation scenario as a combination of a prescribed network (e.g., path) model and a particular traffic model. We present comprehensive sets of network and traffic model characteristics (i.e., network scenario characteristics) that can influence the performance of CCAs, as well as a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for measuring the performance of CCAs. We taxonomize CCA evaluations into the main categories: Steady-state, transient-state, network variation, dynamic (e.g., wireless) network, and competition evaluations. We place and survey the existing CCA evaluation studies in this taxonomy to uncover the main trends and shortcomings of the CCA evaluation field to date. To facilitate the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs, we have developed the publicly available CCA evaluation framework ccperf, which incorporates the insights from our survey. We also outline future research directions to further advance the comprehensive rigorous evaluation of CCAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CiteScore
80.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials is an online journal published by the IEEE Communications Society for tutorials and surveys covering all aspects of the communications field. Telecommunications technology is progressing at a rapid pace, and the IEEE Communications Society is committed to providing researchers and other professionals the information and tools to stay abreast. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials focuses on integrating and adding understanding to the existing literature on communications, putting results in context. Whether searching for in-depth information about a familiar area or an introduction into a new area, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials aims to be the premier source of peer-reviewed, comprehensive tutorials and surveys, and pointers to further sources. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials publishes only articles exclusively written for IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials and go through a rigorous review process before their publication in the quarterly issues. A tutorial article in the IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials should be designed to help the reader to become familiar with and learn something specific about a chosen topic. In contrast, the term survey, as applied here, is defined to mean a survey of the literature. A survey article in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials should provide a comprehensive review of developments in a selected area, covering its development from its inception to its current state and beyond, and illustrating its development through liberal citations from the literature. Both tutorials and surveys should be tutorial in nature and should be written in a style comprehensible to readers outside the specialty of the article.
期刊最新文献
Reliability and Availability in Virtualized Networks: A Survey on Standards, Modeling Approaches, and Research Challenges Security and Privacy in O-RAN for 6G: A Comprehensive Review of Threats and Mitigation Approaches Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey Integrated Radio Sensing Capabilities for 6G Networks: AI/ML Perspective A Tutorial on AI-Empowered Integrated Sensing and Communications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1