W.G. Wei , H. Yu , Q. Xiao , Z.B. Li , J. Li , X.Y. Zhang , Y.C. Wu , T.L. Qin , X.H. Zeng , Y. Song , G.J. Li , S. Bai
{"title":"调强质子治疗与质子弧治疗对肺立体定向放疗4D稳健性优化方案相互作用的稳健性比较","authors":"W.G. Wei , H. Yu , Q. Xiao , Z.B. Li , J. Li , X.Y. Zhang , Y.C. Wu , T.L. Qin , X.H. Zeng , Y. Song , G.J. Li , S. Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess the robustness of 4D-optimised IMPT and PAT plans against interplay effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with respiratory motion over 10 mm, and to provide insights into the use of proton-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer with significant tumour movement.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Fourteen patients with early-stage NSCLC and tumour motion >10 mm were selected. Three hypofraction regimens were generated using 4D robust optimisation with the IMPT and PAT techniques. The nominal plan qualities for both techniques were compared, and their robustness against setup and range uncertainties was evaluated. 4D dynamic dose and the 4D static dose were generated to calculate <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mi>M</mi><mi>R</mi></msubsup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mo>%</mo><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> for interplay effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PAT plans demonstrated superior target metrics such as D<sub>95</sub> and D<sub>2</sub>, and offered enhanced protection for organs at risk (OARs), particularly in lung metrics, across multiple fractionation schemes (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The robustness of target coverage against setup and range uncertainties was better in PAT plans than IMPT, with average pass rates of 97.8% and 95.4%, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.01). The interplay effect significantly affected target metrics in single-fraction plans, decreasing with more fractions, while its effect on OAR metrics was minimal. Median values for single-fraction plans were: <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>98</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was -3% for IMPT and -0.7% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.01); <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>95</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was -2.4% for IMPT and -0.6% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.01); <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was 3.2% for IMPT and 0.9% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The interplay effects resulted in median homogeneity index deviations of 9.1% and 2% for the IMPT and PAT plans, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Different starting phases affected IMPT more significantly than PAT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PAT demonstrated greater robustness to interplay effects than IMPT for hypofractionated treatments of early-stage NSCLC, particularly in single-fraction schemes. Additionally, PAT showed good resilience to variations in different starting phases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 103757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Robustness of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy and Proton-arc Therapy Against Interplay Effects of 4D Robust-optimised Plans for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"W.G. Wei , H. Yu , Q. Xiao , Z.B. Li , J. Li , X.Y. Zhang , Y.C. Wu , T.L. Qin , X.H. Zeng , Y. Song , G.J. Li , S. Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess the robustness of 4D-optimised IMPT and PAT plans against interplay effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with respiratory motion over 10 mm, and to provide insights into the use of proton-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer with significant tumour movement.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Fourteen patients with early-stage NSCLC and tumour motion >10 mm were selected. Three hypofraction regimens were generated using 4D robust optimisation with the IMPT and PAT techniques. The nominal plan qualities for both techniques were compared, and their robustness against setup and range uncertainties was evaluated. 4D dynamic dose and the 4D static dose were generated to calculate <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mi>M</mi><mi>R</mi></msubsup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mo>%</mo><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> for interplay effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PAT plans demonstrated superior target metrics such as D<sub>95</sub> and D<sub>2</sub>, and offered enhanced protection for organs at risk (OARs), particularly in lung metrics, across multiple fractionation schemes (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The robustness of target coverage against setup and range uncertainties was better in PAT plans than IMPT, with average pass rates of 97.8% and 95.4%, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.01). The interplay effect significantly affected target metrics in single-fraction plans, decreasing with more fractions, while its effect on OAR metrics was minimal. Median values for single-fraction plans were: <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>98</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was -3% for IMPT and -0.7% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.01); <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>95</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was -2.4% for IMPT and -0.6% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.01); <span><math><mrow><mo>Δ</mo><msubsup><mi>I</mi><mrow><mi>D</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span> was 3.2% for IMPT and 0.9% for PAT (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The interplay effects resulted in median homogeneity index deviations of 9.1% and 2% for the IMPT and PAT plans, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Different starting phases affected IMPT more significantly than PAT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PAT demonstrated greater robustness to interplay effects than IMPT for hypofractionated treatments of early-stage NSCLC, particularly in single-fraction schemes. Additionally, PAT showed good resilience to variations in different starting phases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655525000123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655525000123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing the Robustness of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy and Proton-arc Therapy Against Interplay Effects of 4D Robust-optimised Plans for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Aims
To assess the robustness of 4D-optimised IMPT and PAT plans against interplay effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with respiratory motion over 10 mm, and to provide insights into the use of proton-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer with significant tumour movement.
Materials and methods
Fourteen patients with early-stage NSCLC and tumour motion >10 mm were selected. Three hypofraction regimens were generated using 4D robust optimisation with the IMPT and PAT techniques. The nominal plan qualities for both techniques were compared, and their robustness against setup and range uncertainties was evaluated. 4D dynamic dose and the 4D static dose were generated to calculate for interplay effects.
Results
PAT plans demonstrated superior target metrics such as D95 and D2, and offered enhanced protection for organs at risk (OARs), particularly in lung metrics, across multiple fractionation schemes (p < 0.05). The robustness of target coverage against setup and range uncertainties was better in PAT plans than IMPT, with average pass rates of 97.8% and 95.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). The interplay effect significantly affected target metrics in single-fraction plans, decreasing with more fractions, while its effect on OAR metrics was minimal. Median values for single-fraction plans were: was -3% for IMPT and -0.7% for PAT (p < 0.01); was -2.4% for IMPT and -0.6% for PAT (p < 0.01); was 3.2% for IMPT and 0.9% for PAT (p < 0.05). The interplay effects resulted in median homogeneity index deviations of 9.1% and 2% for the IMPT and PAT plans, respectively (p < 0.01). Different starting phases affected IMPT more significantly than PAT.
Conclusion
PAT demonstrated greater robustness to interplay effects than IMPT for hypofractionated treatments of early-stage NSCLC, particularly in single-fraction schemes. Additionally, PAT showed good resilience to variations in different starting phases.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.