Abdallah R Allam, Mohamed Salah Alhateem, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud
{"title":"非唑啉奈坦治疗绝经后妇女血管舒缩症状的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和GRADE评价","authors":"Abdallah R Allam, Mohamed Salah Alhateem, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to estimate fezolinetant's effectiveness and safety in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for all published randomized controlled trials. Review Manager Software was used for the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study contained five trials with 3295 individuals with a mean age of 54.4 years. The frequency of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group compared to the placebo group [MD = - 2.42, 95% CI (- 2.81, - 2.04), P < 0.00001]. Additionally, when compared to the placebo group, the severity of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group [SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI (- 0.46, - 0.26), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the fezolinetant group and the placebo group [RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.97, 1.07), P = 0.51].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fezolinetant is efficient and well-tolerated in the treatment of postmenopausal women with VMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fezolinetant's efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Abdallah R Allam, Mohamed Salah Alhateem, Abdelrahman Mohamed Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to estimate fezolinetant's effectiveness and safety in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for all published randomized controlled trials. Review Manager Software was used for the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study contained five trials with 3295 individuals with a mean age of 54.4 years. The frequency of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group compared to the placebo group [MD = - 2.42, 95% CI (- 2.81, - 2.04), P < 0.00001]. Additionally, when compared to the placebo group, the severity of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group [SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI (- 0.46, - 0.26), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the fezolinetant group and the placebo group [RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.97, 1.07), P = 0.51].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fezolinetant is efficient and well-tolerated in the treatment of postmenopausal women with VMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02279-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:绝经后妇女更容易出现血管舒缩症状(VMS),如热感和出汗。最近的试验研究了非唑啉奈坦在绝经后妇女VMS治疗中的作用。我们的研究旨在对这些试验进行荟萃分析,以评估fezolinetant在绝经后妇女VMS治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:检索Cochrane、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中所有已发表的随机对照试验。meta分析采用Review Manager软件。采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架对证据质量进行分级。结果:我们的研究包括5项试验,3295人,平均年龄54.4岁。与安慰剂组相比,非唑啉奈坦组VMS发生率显著降低[MD = - 2.42, 95% CI (- 2.81, - 2.04), P]结论:非唑啉奈坦治疗绝经后女性VMS有效且耐受性良好。
Fezolinetant's efficacy and safety in treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of randomized controlled trials.
Background: Postmenopausal women are more likely to experience vasomotor symptoms (VMS), such as heat sensation and sweating. Recent trials have investigated fezolinetant in the treatment of VMS in postmenopausal women. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of these trials in order to estimate fezolinetant's effectiveness and safety in the management of VMS in postmenopausal women.
Method: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for all published randomized controlled trials. Review Manager Software was used for the meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.
Results: Our study contained five trials with 3295 individuals with a mean age of 54.4 years. The frequency of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group compared to the placebo group [MD = - 2.42, 95% CI (- 2.81, - 2.04), P < 0.00001]. Additionally, when compared to the placebo group, the severity of VMS was significantly lower in the fezolinetant group [SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI (- 0.46, - 0.26), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) between the fezolinetant group and the placebo group [RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.97, 1.07), P = 0.51].
Conclusion: Fezolinetant is efficient and well-tolerated in the treatment of postmenopausal women with VMS.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.