胰腺手术后患者的生活质量和社会健康。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101969
Nicholas Galouzis, Maria Khawam, Evelyn V. Alexander, Lusine Mesropyan, Carrie Luu, Mohammad R. Khreiss, Taylor S. Riall
{"title":"胰腺手术后患者的生活质量和社会健康。","authors":"Nicholas Galouzis,&nbsp;Maria Khawam,&nbsp;Evelyn V. Alexander,&nbsp;Lusine Mesropyan,&nbsp;Carrie Luu,&nbsp;Mohammad R. Khreiss,&nbsp;Taylor S. Riall","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life (QOL) and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision making aligned with patients’ goals of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire, pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and PROMIS activities and social isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021–2023). Results were compared with both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a &gt;10–12-point change considered clinically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 143 patients were included; 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9 ± 16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared with normative population controls, postpancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2 ± 28.7 vs 81.7 ± 28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6 ± 5.7 vs 50.0 ± 10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared with patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms, they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all &gt;10-point score difference).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QOL and social health are affected by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 3","pages":"Article 101969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life and social health in patients after pancreatic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Galouzis,&nbsp;Maria Khawam,&nbsp;Evelyn V. Alexander,&nbsp;Lusine Mesropyan,&nbsp;Carrie Luu,&nbsp;Mohammad R. Khreiss,&nbsp;Taylor S. Riall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life (QOL) and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision making aligned with patients’ goals of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire, pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and PROMIS activities and social isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021–2023). Results were compared with both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a &gt;10–12-point change considered clinically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 143 patients were included; 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9 ± 16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared with normative population controls, postpancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2 ± 28.7 vs 81.7 ± 28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6 ± 5.7 vs 50.0 ± 10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared with patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms, they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all &gt;10-point score difference).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QOL and social health are affected by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000289\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床医生缺乏关于胰腺切除术后生活质量和社会功能的可靠数据,限制了他们指导患者决策与患者护理目标一致的能力。方法:在本横断面调查研究中,我们使用了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30);pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26;患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS™)参与社会角色的能力;和PROMIS™活动和社会隔离量表适用于所有选择性胰腺切除术(2021-2023)。将结果与标准数据和组间数据进行比较,以确定预测更好的生活质量的因素,其中bbb10 -12分的变化被认为具有临床意义。结果:纳入143例患者。71例(49.6%)完成了分布式调查。应答者的平均年龄为59.9±16.1岁,男性占56.3%。恶性肿瘤行胰十二指肠切除术的占67.6%,占54.9%。与正常人群对照组相比,胰腺切除术后患者的角色功能评分较低(67.2±28.7分vs 81.7±28.2分,14.5分差),但社会孤立程度较低(40.6±5.7分vs 50.0±10.0分差,9.4分差)。与良性疾病患者相比,恶性疾病患者的社会功能在临床上明显恶化;更多的疲劳、疼痛、便秘、味觉改变、体重减轻、虚弱和排便习惯改变;更糟糕的身体形象;也增加了对未来的担忧。尽管有更多的症状,但他们对所接受的医疗保健服务更满意(所有的bbb10分评分差)。结论:胰腺切除术影响患者的生活质量和社会健康,其预后因良性或恶性疾病而异。这些问题在很大程度上没有得到解决,是改善生活质量的潜在干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of life and social health in patients after pancreatic surgery

Background

Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life (QOL) and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision making aligned with patients’ goals of care.

Methods

In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire, pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and PROMIS activities and social isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021–2023). Results were compared with both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a >10–12-point change considered clinically significant.

Results

A total of 143 patients were included; 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9 ± 16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared with normative population controls, postpancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2 ± 28.7 vs 81.7 ± 28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6 ± 5.7 vs 50.0 ± 10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared with patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms, they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all >10-point score difference).

Conclusion

QOL and social health are affected by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Robotic reoperative management of recurrent gallbladder disease after subtotal cholecystectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience Letter to the editor regarding “Exercise interventions for health-related quality of life, fatigue, depression, and anxiety in colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis” Employment disruption and missed workdays after neoadjuvant therapy receipt for high-risk gastrointestinal cancer Assessment of stapled vs handsewn anastomoses in video-assisted thoracoscopic and laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on factors affecting postoperative recovery in colorectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score–matched analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1