来源不明的栓塞性卒中患者中基于cta的颈动脉斑块- rads亚型的患病率

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048305
Jae W Song, Huy Q Phi, Manisha Koneru, Quy Cao, Jeremy Rubin, Yu Sakai, Lamya Ibrahim, Sonya E Zhou, John H Woo, Scott E Kasner, Luca Saba, Brett L Cucchiara
{"title":"来源不明的栓塞性卒中患者中基于cta的颈动脉斑块- rads亚型的患病率","authors":"Jae W Song, Huy Q Phi, Manisha Koneru, Quy Cao, Jeremy Rubin, Yu Sakai, Lamya Ibrahim, Sonya E Zhou, John H Woo, Scott E Kasner, Luca Saba, Brett L Cucchiara","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A modified computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based Carotid Plaque Reporting and Data System (Plaque-RADS) classification was applied to a cohort of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source to test whether high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes are more prevalent on the ipsilateral side of stroke. With the widespread use of CTA for stroke evaluation, a CTA-based Plaque-RADS would be valuable for generalizability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a single integrated health system comprised of 3 hospitals with a comprehensive stroke center between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2017. Patients with unilateral anterior circulation stroke and <50% carotid stenosis on CTA were retrospectively identified. Maximum plaque thickness and ulceration were assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the stroke side. A semiautomated segmentation software measured intraplaque hemorrhage volumes. Modified CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification was defined as (1) no plaque, (2) plaque thickness <3 mm, (3) plaque thickness ≥3 mm or ulcerated, and (4) plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage >50 mm<sup>3</sup> irrespective of plaque thickness. High-risk plaque subtypes (Plaque-RADS 3 and 4) were compared with low-risk subtypes (Plaque-RADS 1 and 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four patients (55% women; median age, 66 years) were included. CTA-based Plaque-RADS categories for plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were as follows: (1) 14.9%, (2) 42.6%, (3) 41.5%, and (4) 1.1%. Carotid plaques contralateral to stroke side were Plaque-RADS: (1) 21.3%, (2) 46.8%, (3) 31.9%, and (4) 0%. When compared with the contralateral side, plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were significantly associated with high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in a mixed-effects logistic model adjusting for age and sex (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.20-3.71]; <i>P</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carotid plaque ipsilateral to the stroke side was significantly associated with CTA-based high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in an embolic stroke of undetermined source cohort. A CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification may be useful for identifying potentially causative carotid plaque phenotypes in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"737-740"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of High-Risk CTA-Based Carotid Plaque-RADS Subtypes in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.\",\"authors\":\"Jae W Song, Huy Q Phi, Manisha Koneru, Quy Cao, Jeremy Rubin, Yu Sakai, Lamya Ibrahim, Sonya E Zhou, John H Woo, Scott E Kasner, Luca Saba, Brett L Cucchiara\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A modified computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based Carotid Plaque Reporting and Data System (Plaque-RADS) classification was applied to a cohort of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source to test whether high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes are more prevalent on the ipsilateral side of stroke. With the widespread use of CTA for stroke evaluation, a CTA-based Plaque-RADS would be valuable for generalizability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a single integrated health system comprised of 3 hospitals with a comprehensive stroke center between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2017. Patients with unilateral anterior circulation stroke and <50% carotid stenosis on CTA were retrospectively identified. Maximum plaque thickness and ulceration were assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the stroke side. A semiautomated segmentation software measured intraplaque hemorrhage volumes. Modified CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification was defined as (1) no plaque, (2) plaque thickness <3 mm, (3) plaque thickness ≥3 mm or ulcerated, and (4) plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage >50 mm<sup>3</sup> irrespective of plaque thickness. High-risk plaque subtypes (Plaque-RADS 3 and 4) were compared with low-risk subtypes (Plaque-RADS 1 and 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four patients (55% women; median age, 66 years) were included. CTA-based Plaque-RADS categories for plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were as follows: (1) 14.9%, (2) 42.6%, (3) 41.5%, and (4) 1.1%. Carotid plaques contralateral to stroke side were Plaque-RADS: (1) 21.3%, (2) 46.8%, (3) 31.9%, and (4) 0%. When compared with the contralateral side, plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were significantly associated with high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in a mixed-effects logistic model adjusting for age and sex (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.20-3.71]; <i>P</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carotid plaque ipsilateral to the stroke side was significantly associated with CTA-based high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in an embolic stroke of undetermined source cohort. A CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification may be useful for identifying potentially causative carotid plaque phenotypes in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"737-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048305\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于改良的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的颈动脉斑块报告和数据系统(斑块- rads)分类应用于一组来源不详的栓塞性卒中患者,以测试高风险斑块- rads亚型是否在卒中同侧更普遍。随着CTA在卒中评估中的广泛应用,基于CTA的斑块rads将具有推广价值。方法:在2015年10月1日至2017年4月1日期间,在由3家医院组成的单一综合卫生系统中进行回顾性观察性横断面研究。单侧前循环卒中患者,不论斑块厚度,均为50mm3。高危斑块亚型(斑块- rads 3和4)与低危亚型(斑块- rads 1和2)进行比较。中位年龄为66岁)。卒中侧同侧斑块基于cta的斑块- rads分类如下:(1)14.9%,(2)42.6%,(3)41.5%,(4)1.1%。卒中侧对侧颈动脉斑块斑块- rads分别为:(1)21.3%,(2)46.8%,(3)31.9%,(4)0%。与对侧相比,在调整年龄和性别的混合效应logistic模型中,卒中侧同侧斑块与高危斑块- rads亚型显著相关(校正优势比2.10 [95% CI, 1.20-3.71];P = 0.01)。结论:在来源不明的栓塞性卒中队列中,卒中侧同侧颈动脉斑块与基于cta的高危斑块- rads亚型显著相关。基于cta的斑块- rads分类可能有助于在来源不明的栓塞性卒中患者中识别潜在的颈动脉斑块表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of High-Risk CTA-Based Carotid Plaque-RADS Subtypes in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Background: A modified computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based Carotid Plaque Reporting and Data System (Plaque-RADS) classification was applied to a cohort of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source to test whether high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes are more prevalent on the ipsilateral side of stroke. With the widespread use of CTA for stroke evaluation, a CTA-based Plaque-RADS would be valuable for generalizability.

Methods: A retrospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a single integrated health system comprised of 3 hospitals with a comprehensive stroke center between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2017. Patients with unilateral anterior circulation stroke and <50% carotid stenosis on CTA were retrospectively identified. Maximum plaque thickness and ulceration were assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the stroke side. A semiautomated segmentation software measured intraplaque hemorrhage volumes. Modified CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification was defined as (1) no plaque, (2) plaque thickness <3 mm, (3) plaque thickness ≥3 mm or ulcerated, and (4) plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage >50 mm3 irrespective of plaque thickness. High-risk plaque subtypes (Plaque-RADS 3 and 4) were compared with low-risk subtypes (Plaque-RADS 1 and 2).

Results: Ninety-four patients (55% women; median age, 66 years) were included. CTA-based Plaque-RADS categories for plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were as follows: (1) 14.9%, (2) 42.6%, (3) 41.5%, and (4) 1.1%. Carotid plaques contralateral to stroke side were Plaque-RADS: (1) 21.3%, (2) 46.8%, (3) 31.9%, and (4) 0%. When compared with the contralateral side, plaques ipsilateral to the stroke side were significantly associated with high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in a mixed-effects logistic model adjusting for age and sex (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.20-3.71]; P=0.01).

Conclusions: Carotid plaque ipsilateral to the stroke side was significantly associated with CTA-based high-risk Plaque-RADS subtypes in an embolic stroke of undetermined source cohort. A CTA-based Plaque-RADS classification may be useful for identifying potentially causative carotid plaque phenotypes in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Acute Kidney Injury After Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Following Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy. Delayed Recognition and Stroke-Predominant Presentation in Down Syndrome-Associated Moyamoya Syndrome. Medical Treatment or Intervention for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis? Interpreting CREST-2. Leptomeningeal Collaterals Constitute an Immune-Responsive Vascular Niche in Ischemic Stroke. BCKDK, A Novel Hypoxia-Responsive Kinase That Exacerbates Cerebral Ischemia Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1