患者拒绝初级保健试验在线治疗的原因:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.4 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272
Fiona Fox, Debbie Tallon, Roz Shafran, Paul Lanham, Christopher Williams, Berry Jude, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Katrina Turner
{"title":"患者拒绝初级保健试验在线治疗的原因:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Fiona Fox, Debbie Tallon, Roz Shafran, Paul Lanham, Christopher Williams, Berry Jude, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating therapist-led sessions and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximise future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at three UK trial sites.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a subgroup. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (<i>n</i> = 387); therapy provided online (<i>n</i> = 284); to receive CBT (<i>n</i> = 262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT, and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms, or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Fox, Debbie Tallon, Roz Shafran, Paul Lanham, Christopher Williams, Berry Jude, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Katrina Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating therapist-led sessions and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximise future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at three UK trial sites.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a subgroup. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (<i>n</i> = 387); therapy provided online (<i>n</i> = 284); to receive CBT (<i>n</i> = 262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT, and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms, or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将治疗师主导的会议和认知行为疗法(CBT)材料整合到一个在线平台中可能对抑郁症患者有效。一项评估这种提供CBT模式的试验正在进行中。为了最大限度地扩大未来的试验招募和了解患者对健康干预措施的看法,探索拒绝参与的原因是很重要的。目的:探讨抑郁症患者拒绝参加在线CBT综合治疗试验的原因。设计与设置:一项混合方法研究,通过问卷调查和电话访谈从英国三个试验点的患者中收集数据。方法:个人填写一份简短的问卷,说明他们不参加试验的原因。电话采访进一步探讨了这些原因与一个小组。定量资料采用描述性统计进行汇总。定性访谈按主题进行分析。结果:在1799名响应邀请参加试验的患者中,40.3%的患者拒绝接触。最常见的原因是:不想参加研究(n=387);在线治疗(n=284);接受CBT治疗(n=262)。对15名“退步者”进行的定性访谈强调,这些决定与认知资格、以前的CBT经历以及在线接受CBT的不确定性有关。个人情况、抑郁症状或其他心理健康问题也是参与的障碍。结论:初级保健患者不参加综合在线CBT试验的原因表明,在招募时,讨论患者对其资格的看法以及他们是否会接受正在评估的干预措施是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Integrating therapist-led sessions and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximise future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate.

Aim: To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression.

Design & setting: A mixed-methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at three UK trial sites.

Method: Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a subgroup. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (n = 387); therapy provided online (n = 284); to receive CBT (n = 262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT, and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms, or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation.

Conclusion: Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound for undifferentiated and musculoskeletal presentations in UK primary care: a scoping review protocol. Telephone-first access to general practice for older people: a qualitative study. The GP Evidence website: focus-group evaluation study of a new point-of-care information resource. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for future primary care: a qualitative interview study with GPs and medical practice assistants in Germany. Pharmacist-led osteoporosis review: perceptions of current practice, care gaps, and implementation challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1