韩国成人压力与逆境量表:初步验证及其与精神疾病的关联。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3390/brainsci15010032
Eun Soo Kim, Yun Tae Kim, Kang-Seob Oh, Young Chul Shin, Sang-Won Jeon, Dong-Won Shin, Sung Joon Cho, George M Slavich, Junhyung Kim
{"title":"韩国成人压力与逆境量表:初步验证及其与精神疾病的关联。","authors":"Eun Soo Kim, Yun Tae Kim, Kang-Seob Oh, Young Chul Shin, Sang-Won Jeon, Dong-Won Shin, Sung Joon Cho, George M Slavich, Junhyung Kim","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15010032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Stressors occurring across the life course are considered to have a cumulative impact on health, but there is no instrument for assessing lifetime stressor exposure in Korea. Therefore, we validated the Stress and Adversity Inventory (Adult STRAIN) in Korean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We translated the Adult STRAIN into Korean and examined its concurrent, predictive, and comparative predictive validity in 218 Korean adults (79 men, 139 women; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 29.5; 19-50 years old) recruited from a psychiatric setting. We assessed concurrent validity using Pearson's correlations, predictive validity using multiple regression models, and comparative predictive validity using multivariate logistic regression to identify participants with lifetime psychiatric diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Korean STRAIN exhibited sufficient usability and acceptability; good concurrent validity with other measures of early adversity, life events, and perceived stress (<i>r</i>s = 0.48-0.61); and strong predictive validity in relation to anxiety and depressive symptoms (β = 0.08-0.47; ΔR2 = 0.11-0.21). Each domain of Korean-style stress, based on the timing, type, life domain, and sociopsychological characteristics of stress exposure, showed a different distribution of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis probabilities (odds ratios = 1.20-4.85). Finally, the test-retest reliability for total lifetime stressor count and severity over four weeks was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Korean STRAIN is a practical, valid, and reliable instrument for researchers and clinicians to efficiently assess lifetime stressor exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN) in Korean: Initial Validation and Associations with Psychiatric Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Eun Soo Kim, Yun Tae Kim, Kang-Seob Oh, Young Chul Shin, Sang-Won Jeon, Dong-Won Shin, Sung Joon Cho, George M Slavich, Junhyung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15010032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Stressors occurring across the life course are considered to have a cumulative impact on health, but there is no instrument for assessing lifetime stressor exposure in Korea. Therefore, we validated the Stress and Adversity Inventory (Adult STRAIN) in Korean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We translated the Adult STRAIN into Korean and examined its concurrent, predictive, and comparative predictive validity in 218 Korean adults (79 men, 139 women; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 29.5; 19-50 years old) recruited from a psychiatric setting. We assessed concurrent validity using Pearson's correlations, predictive validity using multiple regression models, and comparative predictive validity using multivariate logistic regression to identify participants with lifetime psychiatric diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Korean STRAIN exhibited sufficient usability and acceptability; good concurrent validity with other measures of early adversity, life events, and perceived stress (<i>r</i>s = 0.48-0.61); and strong predictive validity in relation to anxiety and depressive symptoms (β = 0.08-0.47; ΔR2 = 0.11-0.21). Each domain of Korean-style stress, based on the timing, type, life domain, and sociopsychological characteristics of stress exposure, showed a different distribution of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis probabilities (odds ratios = 1.20-4.85). Finally, the test-retest reliability for total lifetime stressor count and severity over four weeks was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Korean STRAIN is a practical, valid, and reliable instrument for researchers and clinicians to efficiently assess lifetime stressor exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在整个生命过程中发生的压力源被认为对健康具有累积影响,但在韩国没有评估终生压力源暴露的工具。因此,我们验证了韩国人的压力与逆境量表(成人应变)。方法:我们将成人菌株翻译成韩语,并对218名韩国成年人(79名男性,139名女性;法师= 29.5;19-50岁)从精神病院招募。我们使用Pearson相关评估并发效度,使用多元回归模型评估预测效度,使用多变量逻辑回归评估比较预测效度,以确定终身精神病诊断的参与者。结果:韩国菌株具有足够的可用性和可接受性;与其他早期逆境、生活事件和感知压力的测量具有良好的并发效度(rs = 0.48-0.61);与焦虑、抑郁症状相关的预测效度较强(β = 0.08-0.47;Δr2 = 0.11-0.21)。韩国式压力的各个领域,根据压力暴露的时间、类型、生活领域和社会心理特征,显示出不同的终生精神病诊断概率分布(优势比= 1.20-4.85)。最后,4周内总应激源数和严重程度的重测信度较高。结论:韩国应变是一种实用、有效、可靠的研究人员和临床医生有效评估终身应激源暴露的仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN) in Korean: Initial Validation and Associations with Psychiatric Disorders.

Background/objectives: Stressors occurring across the life course are considered to have a cumulative impact on health, but there is no instrument for assessing lifetime stressor exposure in Korea. Therefore, we validated the Stress and Adversity Inventory (Adult STRAIN) in Korean.

Methods: We translated the Adult STRAIN into Korean and examined its concurrent, predictive, and comparative predictive validity in 218 Korean adults (79 men, 139 women; Mage = 29.5; 19-50 years old) recruited from a psychiatric setting. We assessed concurrent validity using Pearson's correlations, predictive validity using multiple regression models, and comparative predictive validity using multivariate logistic regression to identify participants with lifetime psychiatric diagnoses.

Results: The Korean STRAIN exhibited sufficient usability and acceptability; good concurrent validity with other measures of early adversity, life events, and perceived stress (rs = 0.48-0.61); and strong predictive validity in relation to anxiety and depressive symptoms (β = 0.08-0.47; ΔR2 = 0.11-0.21). Each domain of Korean-style stress, based on the timing, type, life domain, and sociopsychological characteristics of stress exposure, showed a different distribution of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis probabilities (odds ratios = 1.20-4.85). Finally, the test-retest reliability for total lifetime stressor count and severity over four weeks was high.

Conclusions: The Korean STRAIN is a practical, valid, and reliable instrument for researchers and clinicians to efficiently assess lifetime stressor exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
Modulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and AMPK/TSC2/mTOR Pathways by N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine as a Protector of Embryonic Bodies from the Toxic Effect of Methylmercury. Paper to Pixels: Enhancing Unilateral Neglect Assessment Using the New Computer Vision-Based Tool CANDO. New Advances in the Development of New Drugs and Treatment Targets for Brain Cancers (2nd Edition). Opicapone as Add-On Therapy to Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa Infusion: Clinical Improvement and Wearable Sensor-Based Gait Analysis. The Psychological and Behavioural Correlates of Workplace Victimization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1