基于深度学习的单次屏气3毫米急促重建提高腹部图像质量,减少采集时间:定量分析。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32010030
Felix Kubicka, Qinxuan Tan, Tom Meyer, Dominik Nickel, Elisabeth Weiland, Moritz Wagner, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia
{"title":"基于深度学习的单次屏气3毫米急促重建提高腹部图像质量,减少采集时间:定量分析。","authors":"Felix Kubicka, Qinxuan Tan, Tom Meyer, Dominik Nickel, Elisabeth Weiland, Moritz Wagner, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen with a slice thickness below 5 mm suffers from high image noise and blurring. The purpose of this prospective study was to improve image quality and accelerate imaging acquisition by using single-breath-hold T2-weighted HASTE with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (DL-HASTE) with a 3 mm slice thickness. <b>Method:</b> MRI of the upper abdomen with DL-HASTE was performed in 35 participants (5 healthy volunteers and 30 patients) at 3 Tesla. In a subgroup of five healthy participants, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis was used after DL reconstruction to identify the smallest possible layer thickness (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mm). DL-HASTE was acquired with a 3 mm slice thickness (DL-HASTE-3 mm) in 30 patients and compared with 5 mm DL-HASTE (DL-HASTE-5 mm) and with standard HASTE (standard-HASTE-5 mm). Image quality and motion artifacts were assessed quantitatively using Laplacian variance and semi-quantitatively by two radiologists using five-point Likert scales. <b>Results:</b> In the five healthy participants, DL-HASTE-3 mm was identified as the optimal slice (SNR 23.227 ± 3.901). Both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm were assigned significantly higher overall image quality scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (Laplacian variance, both <i>p</i> < 0.001; Likert scale, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared with DL-HASTE-5 mm (1.10 × 10<sup>-5</sup> ± 6.93 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), DL-HASTE-3 mm (1.56 × 10<sup>-5</sup> ± 8.69 × 10<sup>-6</sup>) provided a significantly higher SNR Laplacian variance (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and sharpness sub-scores for the intestinal tract, adrenal glands, and small anatomic structures (bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and vessels; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Lesion detectability was rated excellent for both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm (both: 5 [IQR4-5]) and was assigned higher scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (4 [IQR4-5]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). DL-HASTE reduced the acquisition time by 63-69% compared with standard-HASTE-5 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DL-HASTE is a robust abdominal MRI technique that improves image quality while at the same time reducing acquisition time compared with the routine clinical HASTE sequence. Using ultra-thin DL-HASTE-3 mm results in an even greater improvement with a similar SNR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction of Single-Breath-Hold 3 mm HASTE Improves Abdominal Image Quality and Reduces Acquisition Time: A Quantitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Kubicka, Qinxuan Tan, Tom Meyer, Dominik Nickel, Elisabeth Weiland, Moritz Wagner, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32010030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen with a slice thickness below 5 mm suffers from high image noise and blurring. The purpose of this prospective study was to improve image quality and accelerate imaging acquisition by using single-breath-hold T2-weighted HASTE with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (DL-HASTE) with a 3 mm slice thickness. <b>Method:</b> MRI of the upper abdomen with DL-HASTE was performed in 35 participants (5 healthy volunteers and 30 patients) at 3 Tesla. In a subgroup of five healthy participants, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis was used after DL reconstruction to identify the smallest possible layer thickness (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mm). DL-HASTE was acquired with a 3 mm slice thickness (DL-HASTE-3 mm) in 30 patients and compared with 5 mm DL-HASTE (DL-HASTE-5 mm) and with standard HASTE (standard-HASTE-5 mm). Image quality and motion artifacts were assessed quantitatively using Laplacian variance and semi-quantitatively by two radiologists using five-point Likert scales. <b>Results:</b> In the five healthy participants, DL-HASTE-3 mm was identified as the optimal slice (SNR 23.227 ± 3.901). Both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm were assigned significantly higher overall image quality scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (Laplacian variance, both <i>p</i> < 0.001; Likert scale, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared with DL-HASTE-5 mm (1.10 × 10<sup>-5</sup> ± 6.93 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), DL-HASTE-3 mm (1.56 × 10<sup>-5</sup> ± 8.69 × 10<sup>-6</sup>) provided a significantly higher SNR Laplacian variance (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and sharpness sub-scores for the intestinal tract, adrenal glands, and small anatomic structures (bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and vessels; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Lesion detectability was rated excellent for both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm (both: 5 [IQR4-5]) and was assigned higher scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (4 [IQR4-5]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). DL-HASTE reduced the acquisition time by 63-69% compared with standard-HASTE-5 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DL-HASTE is a robust abdominal MRI technique that improves image quality while at the same time reducing acquisition time compared with the routine clinical HASTE sequence. Using ultra-thin DL-HASTE-3 mm results in an even greater improvement with a similar SNR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763676/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:屏气t2加权半傅立叶采集单次涡轮自旋回波(HASTE)上腹部磁共振成像(MRI),切片厚度小于5mm,图像噪声高,模糊。本前瞻性研究的目的是通过使用3 mm切片厚度的单次屏气t2加权急促成像和深度学习(DL)重建(DL-急促)来提高图像质量和加速成像采集。方法:对35名受试者(5名健康志愿者和30名患者)在3特斯拉下进行上腹部MRI扫描。在5名健康参与者的亚组中,在DL重建后使用信噪比(SNR)分析确定最小可能的层厚度(1,2,3,4,5 mm)。在30例患者中获得3 mm切片厚度(DL-HASTE-3 mm)的DL-HASTE,并与5 mm的DL-HASTE (DL-HASTE-5 mm)和标准的HASTE (standard-HASTE-5 mm)进行比较。图像质量和运动伪影采用拉普拉斯方差定量评估,由两名放射科医生采用五点李克特量表进行半定量评估。结果:在5名健康受试者中,DL-HASTE-3 mm为最佳切片(信噪比23.227±3.901)。DL-HASTE-3 mm和DL-HASTE-5 mm的整体图像质量评分均显著高于标准haste -5 mm(拉普拉斯方差,p均< 0.001;李克特量表,p < 0.001)。与DL-HASTE-5 mm (1.10 × 10-5±6.93 × 10-6)相比,DL-HASTE-3 mm (1.56 × 10-5±8.69 × 10-6)在肠道、肾上腺和小解剖结构(胆管、胰管和血管)上的信噪比和清晰度评分显著高于DL-HASTE-5 mm (1.10 × 10-5±6.93 × 10-6)。P < 0.05)。DL-HASTE-3 mm和DL-HASTE-5 mm的病变可检出性均被评为优秀(均为5分[IQR4-5]),并被评为高于标准haste -5 mm(4分[IQR4-5]);P < 0.001)。DL-HASTE与标准haste -5 mm相比,采集时间缩短了63-69% (p < 0.001)。结论:DL-HASTE是一种强大的腹部MRI技术,与常规的临床HASTE序列相比,它在提高图像质量的同时减少了采集时间。使用超薄DL-HASTE-3 mm可以在类似信噪比的情况下获得更大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction of Single-Breath-Hold 3 mm HASTE Improves Abdominal Image Quality and Reduces Acquisition Time: A Quantitative Analysis.

Purpose: Breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen with a slice thickness below 5 mm suffers from high image noise and blurring. The purpose of this prospective study was to improve image quality and accelerate imaging acquisition by using single-breath-hold T2-weighted HASTE with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (DL-HASTE) with a 3 mm slice thickness. Method: MRI of the upper abdomen with DL-HASTE was performed in 35 participants (5 healthy volunteers and 30 patients) at 3 Tesla. In a subgroup of five healthy participants, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis was used after DL reconstruction to identify the smallest possible layer thickness (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mm). DL-HASTE was acquired with a 3 mm slice thickness (DL-HASTE-3 mm) in 30 patients and compared with 5 mm DL-HASTE (DL-HASTE-5 mm) and with standard HASTE (standard-HASTE-5 mm). Image quality and motion artifacts were assessed quantitatively using Laplacian variance and semi-quantitatively by two radiologists using five-point Likert scales. Results: In the five healthy participants, DL-HASTE-3 mm was identified as the optimal slice (SNR 23.227 ± 3.901). Both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm were assigned significantly higher overall image quality scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (Laplacian variance, both p < 0.001; Likert scale, p < 0.001). Compared with DL-HASTE-5 mm (1.10 × 10-5 ± 6.93 × 10-6), DL-HASTE-3 mm (1.56 × 10-5 ± 8.69 × 10-6) provided a significantly higher SNR Laplacian variance (p < 0.001) and sharpness sub-scores for the intestinal tract, adrenal glands, and small anatomic structures (bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and vessels; p < 0.05). Lesion detectability was rated excellent for both DL-HASTE-3 mm and DL-HASTE-5 mm (both: 5 [IQR4-5]) and was assigned higher scores than standard-HASTE-5 mm (4 [IQR4-5]; p < 0.001). DL-HASTE reduced the acquisition time by 63-69% compared with standard-HASTE-5 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusions: DL-HASTE is a robust abdominal MRI technique that improves image quality while at the same time reducing acquisition time compared with the routine clinical HASTE sequence. Using ultra-thin DL-HASTE-3 mm results in an even greater improvement with a similar SNR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Management of Facial Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Vitiligo with Topical Ruxolitinib: Quantitative Assessment Using a Semi-Automatic Tool. Family Relationships as Modifiable Targets for Caregiver Quality of Life in Hospice Care: A Multicenter Study. Optimizing the Efficacy-Toxicity Paradigm in Pediatric Oncology: A Narrative Review of Immunotherapy and Survivorship Outcomes. Early Neurological Improvement and Ambulation Recovery After Delayed Surgery in Surgically Selected Nonambulatory Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Factors Associated with Autopsy Consent in Pediatric Oncology: A 10-Year Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1