传达科学证据:以阿尔茨海默病药物为例研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530
Kasper P Kepp, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Ioana A Cristea, Robert G Cumming, Timothy Daly, Louise Emilsson, Maria E Flacco, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud, Kasper B Johnsen, Tea Lallukka, Taulant Muka, Florian Naudet, Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim, Rosanna Squitti, Madhav Thambisetty
{"title":"传达科学证据:以阿尔茨海默病药物为例研究。","authors":"Kasper P Kepp, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Ioana A Cristea, Robert G Cumming, Timothy Daly, Louise Emilsson, Maria E Flacco, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud, Kasper B Johnsen, Tea Lallukka, Taulant Muka, Florian Naudet, Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim, Rosanna Squitti, Madhav Thambisetty","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g. journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g. between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Kasper P Kepp, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Ioana A Cristea, Robert G Cumming, Timothy Daly, Louise Emilsson, Maria E Flacco, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud, Kasper B Johnsen, Tea Lallukka, Taulant Muka, Florian Naudet, Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim, Rosanna Squitti, Madhav Thambisetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g. journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g. between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"347-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对新型抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病的科学证据进行了综述,以促进科学证据的交流。我们介绍了从生物医学证据文献中提炼出来的五条指导原则,这些指导原则适用于科学传播的简短格式,例如期刊评论文章和报纸文章。考虑到所讨论药物的重要性和最近的混乱,以及FDA和EMA之间的某些分歧,建议的指南可能对临床医生与患者讨论和科学家平衡地交流证据有用。更一般地说,我们希望该指南可以帮助我们在科学文献的评论文章、倡导和媒体露面中改善有关复杂主题的科学证据的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study.

This paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g. journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g. between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
Pharmacologic profiles and selection of preoperative oral anxiolytics: a narrative review. Prevalence and determinants of inpatient hypoglycemia among hospitalized adults with diabetes: a cohort study. Reduced plasma APJ levels and APLNR G212A polymorphism in Syrian patients with coronary artery disease. Value-based procurement and tenders for medical devices with application to wound care: international perspectives and practical opportunities. Quantifying US healthcare provider preferences for the treatment of post-transplant cytomegalovirus infection using a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1