化学烧伤相关角膜缘干细胞缺乏症的分类和治疗方法:基于新的全球共识。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y
Ilayda Korkmaz, Ozer Sakin, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Ayse Yagci, Ozlem Barut Selver
{"title":"化学烧伤相关角膜缘干细胞缺乏症的分类和治疗方法:基于新的全球共识。","authors":"Ilayda Korkmaz, Ozer Sakin, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Ayse Yagci, Ozlem Barut Selver","doi":"10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the severity distribution of chemical burn-induced Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) according to the novel global consensus classification and to compare the treatment approach, before and after the global consensus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 127 eyes of 109 patients with LSCD were included. LSCD stages were categorized according to the global consensus classification published by \"International LSCD Working Group\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 37.5 ± 16.5(6-75). The distribution of LSCD stage according to the global consensus scale was as follows: Stage 1A in 5 eyes(3.9%);Stage 1B in 16 eyes(12.6%);Stage 1C in 4 eyes(3.2%);Stage 2A in 15 eyes(11.8%);Stage 2B in 36 eyes(28.3%);Stage 3 in 51 eyes(40.2%). A total of 88(69.3%) eyes underwent surgery for LSCD. Of these, 80 had surgery prior to the publication of the global consensus (before October 2020), 58(72.5%) had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD and 22(27.5%) had preoperative early stage (≤ Stage 2A) LSCD. As of October 2020, all 8 eyes that underwent surgery had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD, as recommended by global consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently, a global consensus has been established on both the classification and the management of LSCD. This study is one of the first to present small-scale epidemiological data on the severity distribution of LSCD in the light of the global consensus. It was observed that surgery was performed on 27.5% of the eyes that were not recommended for surgery according to this new consensus. With the increasing awareness of this consensus, it might be possible to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification and treatment approach of chemical burn associated Limbal stem cell deficiency: based on novel global consensus.\",\"authors\":\"Ilayda Korkmaz, Ozer Sakin, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Ayse Yagci, Ozlem Barut Selver\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the severity distribution of chemical burn-induced Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) according to the novel global consensus classification and to compare the treatment approach, before and after the global consensus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 127 eyes of 109 patients with LSCD were included. LSCD stages were categorized according to the global consensus classification published by \\\"International LSCD Working Group\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 37.5 ± 16.5(6-75). The distribution of LSCD stage according to the global consensus scale was as follows: Stage 1A in 5 eyes(3.9%);Stage 1B in 16 eyes(12.6%);Stage 1C in 4 eyes(3.2%);Stage 2A in 15 eyes(11.8%);Stage 2B in 36 eyes(28.3%);Stage 3 in 51 eyes(40.2%). A total of 88(69.3%) eyes underwent surgery for LSCD. Of these, 80 had surgery prior to the publication of the global consensus (before October 2020), 58(72.5%) had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD and 22(27.5%) had preoperative early stage (≤ Stage 2A) LSCD. As of October 2020, all 8 eyes that underwent surgery had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD, as recommended by global consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently, a global consensus has been established on both the classification and the management of LSCD. This study is one of the first to present small-scale epidemiological data on the severity distribution of LSCD in the light of the global consensus. It was observed that surgery was performed on 27.5% of the eyes that were not recommended for surgery according to this new consensus. With the increasing awareness of this consensus, it might be possible to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据新的全球共识分类评估化学烧伤诱导的角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)的严重程度分布,并比较全球共识前后的治疗方法。方法:收集109例LSCD患者127只眼的病历资料。根据“国际LSCD工作组”公布的全球共识分类对LSCD阶段进行分类。结果:平均年龄37.5±16.5岁(6 ~ 75岁)。根据全球共识量表,LSCD分期分布如下:1A期5眼(3.9%),1B期16眼(12.6%),1C期4眼(3.2%),2A期15眼(11.8%),2B期36眼(28.3%),3期51眼(40.2%)。共有88只(69.3%)眼接受了LSCD手术。其中,80人在全球共识发表之前(2020年10月之前)接受了手术,58人(72.5%)术前患有严重(≥2B期)LSCD, 22人(27.5%)术前患有早期(≤2A期)LSCD。截至2020年10月,根据全球共识,所有接受手术的8只眼睛术前均患有严重(≥2B期)LSCD。结论:近年来,全球对LSCD的分类和治疗已形成共识。这项研究是第一个在全球共识的基础上提出LSCD严重程度分布的小规模流行病学数据。根据这一新的共识,观察到27.5%的不推荐手术的眼睛进行了手术。随着对这一共识认识的提高,可能会避免不必要的手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification and treatment approach of chemical burn associated Limbal stem cell deficiency: based on novel global consensus.

Purpose: To evaluate the severity distribution of chemical burn-induced Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) according to the novel global consensus classification and to compare the treatment approach, before and after the global consensus.

Methods: Medical records of 127 eyes of 109 patients with LSCD were included. LSCD stages were categorized according to the global consensus classification published by "International LSCD Working Group".

Results: The mean age was 37.5 ± 16.5(6-75). The distribution of LSCD stage according to the global consensus scale was as follows: Stage 1A in 5 eyes(3.9%);Stage 1B in 16 eyes(12.6%);Stage 1C in 4 eyes(3.2%);Stage 2A in 15 eyes(11.8%);Stage 2B in 36 eyes(28.3%);Stage 3 in 51 eyes(40.2%). A total of 88(69.3%) eyes underwent surgery for LSCD. Of these, 80 had surgery prior to the publication of the global consensus (before October 2020), 58(72.5%) had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD and 22(27.5%) had preoperative early stage (≤ Stage 2A) LSCD. As of October 2020, all 8 eyes that underwent surgery had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD, as recommended by global consensus.

Conclusion: Recently, a global consensus has been established on both the classification and the management of LSCD. This study is one of the first to present small-scale epidemiological data on the severity distribution of LSCD in the light of the global consensus. It was observed that surgery was performed on 27.5% of the eyes that were not recommended for surgery according to this new consensus. With the increasing awareness of this consensus, it might be possible to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Decoding visual pathway damage in pituitary macroadenomas: insights from retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field analysis. Pathological mechanisms of Sjögren's disease-related dry eye: from multiglandular dysfunction to ocular surface inflammation. Ocular toxicity associated with Ethambutol in the South-East Asia Region. The role of STAT3-targeted therapy created with COLIVELIN in the cross-talk between IL6/JAK2/STAT3 and TGF-β/SMAD2/SMAD3 signaling in a hyperinflammation and ROS-induced in vitro AMD model and its effect on retinal apoptosis. The use of the smart eye camera for diagnosing and grading cataract in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in an outpatient setting in Jordan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1