Ian Eustace, Benjamin J R Buckley, Isik Kaya, Katie L Hoad, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Andrew M Hill, Gregory Y H Lip, Ian D Jones, Karen Higginbotham
{"title":"急性脑卒中患者的综合护理管理:一项系统综述。","authors":"Ian Eustace, Benjamin J R Buckley, Isik Kaya, Katie L Hoad, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Andrew M Hill, Gregory Y H Lip, Ian D Jones, Karen Higginbotham","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary stroke care is moving towards more holistic and patient-centred integrated approaches, however, there is need to develop high quality evidence for interventions that benefit patients as part of this approach. This study aims to identify the types of integrated care management strategies that exist for people with stroke, to determine whether stroke management pathways impact patient outcomes and to identify elements of integrated stroke care that were effective at improving outcomes. The study is a systematic review with meta-analysis. The review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to January 2024. Studies that evaluated interventions as part of integrated care against a control or standard treatment group were included. Primary outcomes included mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, unplanned readmission, anxiety and depression, lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors, and adherence to intervention. In total, 99 studies were included and 63 were meta-analysed. Patients receiving integrated stroke care had significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 39%), significant improvements in quality of life (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P < 0.00001, I2 = 91%) and reduced incidence of depression (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 22%). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding. The findings of this study show that integrated care post-stroke is associated with better quality of life and reduced depression and recurrent stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"317-328"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Eustace, Benjamin J R Buckley, Isik Kaya, Katie L Hoad, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Andrew M Hill, Gregory Y H Lip, Ian D Jones, Karen Higginbotham\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contemporary stroke care is moving towards more holistic and patient-centred integrated approaches, however, there is need to develop high quality evidence for interventions that benefit patients as part of this approach. This study aims to identify the types of integrated care management strategies that exist for people with stroke, to determine whether stroke management pathways impact patient outcomes and to identify elements of integrated stroke care that were effective at improving outcomes. The study is a systematic review with meta-analysis. The review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to January 2024. Studies that evaluated interventions as part of integrated care against a control or standard treatment group were included. Primary outcomes included mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, unplanned readmission, anxiety and depression, lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors, and adherence to intervention. In total, 99 studies were included and 63 were meta-analysed. Patients receiving integrated stroke care had significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 39%), significant improvements in quality of life (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P < 0.00001, I2 = 91%) and reduced incidence of depression (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 22%). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding. The findings of this study show that integrated care post-stroke is associated with better quality of life and reduced depression and recurrent stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"317-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:当代脑卒中护理正朝着更加全面和以患者为中心的综合方法发展,然而,作为该方法的一部分,需要为使患者受益的干预措施提供高质量的证据。目的:本研究旨在确定卒中患者存在的综合护理管理策略的类型,确定卒中管理途径是否影响患者的预后,并确定卒中综合护理有效改善预后的要素。设计:采用荟萃分析的系统评价。方法:采用Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science和Cochrane随机对照试验数据库,检索时间为2012年1月至2024年1月。将干预措施作为综合护理的一部分与对照组或标准治疗组进行评估的研究也包括在内。主要结局包括死亡率、卒中复发和大出血。次要结局包括生活质量、意外再入院、焦虑和抑郁、生活方式和心血管危险因素以及对干预的依从性。结果:共纳入99项研究,其中63项进行meta分析。接受卒中综合护理的患者卒中复发显著减少(RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, i2 = 39%),生活质量显著改善(SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P)。结论:本研究结果显示卒中后综合护理与生活质量改善、抑郁和卒中复发减少相关。
Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.
Contemporary stroke care is moving towards more holistic and patient-centred integrated approaches, however, there is need to develop high quality evidence for interventions that benefit patients as part of this approach. This study aims to identify the types of integrated care management strategies that exist for people with stroke, to determine whether stroke management pathways impact patient outcomes and to identify elements of integrated stroke care that were effective at improving outcomes. The study is a systematic review with meta-analysis. The review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to January 2024. Studies that evaluated interventions as part of integrated care against a control or standard treatment group were included. Primary outcomes included mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, unplanned readmission, anxiety and depression, lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors, and adherence to intervention. In total, 99 studies were included and 63 were meta-analysed. Patients receiving integrated stroke care had significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 39%), significant improvements in quality of life (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P < 0.00001, I2 = 91%) and reduced incidence of depression (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 22%). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding. The findings of this study show that integrated care post-stroke is associated with better quality of life and reduced depression and recurrent stroke.
期刊介绍:
QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles.
Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence.
In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.