MASCC COG-IMPACT:由多国癌症支持护理协会开发的癌症相关认知障碍影响的未满足需求评估。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09149-7
Darren Haywood, Alexandre Chan, Raymond J Chan, Frank D Baughman, Evan Dauer, Haryana M Dhillon, Ashley M Henneghan, Blake J Lawrence, Maryam B Lustberg, Moira O'Connor, Janette L Vardy, Susan L Rossell, Nicolas H Hart
{"title":"MASCC COG-IMPACT:由多国癌症支持护理协会开发的癌症相关认知障碍影响的未满足需求评估。","authors":"Darren Haywood, Alexandre Chan, Raymond J Chan, Frank D Baughman, Evan Dauer, Haryana M Dhillon, Ashley M Henneghan, Blake J Lawrence, Maryam B Lustberg, Moira O'Connor, Janette L Vardy, Susan L Rossell, Nicolas H Hart","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09149-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can have a profound impact on the lives of cancer survivors. A multitude of subjective and objective assessment tools exist to assess the presence and severity of CRCI. However, no purpose-built tool exists to assess the unmet needs of cancer survivors directly relating to CRCI. This paper details the development and initial validation of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer - Unmet Needs Assessment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment Impact (the MASCC COG-IMPACT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multistep mixed-methods measurement development and validation approach was taken with a strong emphasis on co-design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with cancer survivors (n = 32) and oncology health professionals (n = 19), followed by a modified Delphi survey with oncology health professionals (n = 29). Cognitive interviews with cancer survivors (n = 22) over two rounds were then conducted to finalise the penultimate version of the unmet needs assessment tool for CRCI. Four-hundred and ninety-one (n = 491) cancer survivors then completed the MASCC COG-IMPACT and other established measures to inform structural, reliability, validity, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final MASCC COG-IMPACT is a 55-item and eight subscale tool including two indices: \"difficulties\" and \"unmet needs\". The MASCC COG-IMPACT was found to have strong structural validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The MASCC COG-IMPACT was also found to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MASCC COG-IMPACT may facilitate optimal care and referral in line with a cancer survivor's CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. The MASCC COG-IMPACT may also be used to explore factors and contributors to CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. Overall, the MASCC COG-IMPACT is a highly reliable and valid tool for the assessment of CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs in both clinical and research settings. The MASCC COG-IMPACT and supporting materials can be accessed on the MASCC webpage or via the MASCC COG-IMPACT Open Science Framework webpage ( https://osf.io/5zc3a/ ).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The MASCC COG-IMPACT: An unmet needs assessment for cancer-related cognitive impairment impact developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Darren Haywood, Alexandre Chan, Raymond J Chan, Frank D Baughman, Evan Dauer, Haryana M Dhillon, Ashley M Henneghan, Blake J Lawrence, Maryam B Lustberg, Moira O'Connor, Janette L Vardy, Susan L Rossell, Nicolas H Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09149-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can have a profound impact on the lives of cancer survivors. A multitude of subjective and objective assessment tools exist to assess the presence and severity of CRCI. However, no purpose-built tool exists to assess the unmet needs of cancer survivors directly relating to CRCI. This paper details the development and initial validation of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer - Unmet Needs Assessment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment Impact (the MASCC COG-IMPACT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multistep mixed-methods measurement development and validation approach was taken with a strong emphasis on co-design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with cancer survivors (n = 32) and oncology health professionals (n = 19), followed by a modified Delphi survey with oncology health professionals (n = 29). Cognitive interviews with cancer survivors (n = 22) over two rounds were then conducted to finalise the penultimate version of the unmet needs assessment tool for CRCI. Four-hundred and ninety-one (n = 491) cancer survivors then completed the MASCC COG-IMPACT and other established measures to inform structural, reliability, validity, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final MASCC COG-IMPACT is a 55-item and eight subscale tool including two indices: \\\"difficulties\\\" and \\\"unmet needs\\\". The MASCC COG-IMPACT was found to have strong structural validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The MASCC COG-IMPACT was also found to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MASCC COG-IMPACT may facilitate optimal care and referral in line with a cancer survivor's CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. The MASCC COG-IMPACT may also be used to explore factors and contributors to CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. Overall, the MASCC COG-IMPACT is a highly reliable and valid tool for the assessment of CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs in both clinical and research settings. The MASCC COG-IMPACT and supporting materials can be accessed on the MASCC webpage or via the MASCC COG-IMPACT Open Science Framework webpage ( https://osf.io/5zc3a/ ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09149-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09149-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症相关认知障碍(CRCI)可能对癌症幸存者的生活产生深远的影响。有许多主观和客观的评估工具来评估CRCI的存在和严重程度。然而,目前还没有专门的工具来评估与CRCI直接相关的癌症幸存者未满足的需求。本文详细介绍了癌症支持护理多国协会-癌症相关认知障碍影响未满足需求评估(MASCC COG-IMPACT)的发展和初步验证。方法:采用多步骤混合方法的测量开发和验证方法,强调协同设计。对癌症幸存者(n = 32)和肿瘤卫生专业人员(n = 19)进行了定性访谈,随后对肿瘤卫生专业人员(n = 29)进行了改进的德尔菲调查。然后对癌症幸存者(n = 22)进行两轮认知访谈,最终确定CRCI未满足需求评估工具的第二个版本。491名(n = 491)癌症幸存者随后完成了MASCC COG-IMPACT和其他既定措施,以告知结构、可靠性、有效性、可接受性、适当性和可行性分析。结果:最终的MASCC COG-IMPACT是一个包含“困难”和“未满足需求”两个指标的55个项目和8个分量表工具。MASCC COG-IMPACT量表具有较强的结构效度、收敛效度、区别效度、内部一致性和重测信度。MASCC COG-IMPACT也被认为是高度可接受的、适当的和可行的。结论:MASCC COG-IMPACT可以根据癌症幸存者的crci相关困难和未满足的需求,促进最佳护理和转诊。MASCC COG-IMPACT也可用于探讨造成crci相关困难和未满足需求的因素和因素。总体而言,MASCC COG-IMPACT是评估临床和研究环境中crci相关困难和未满足需求的高度可靠和有效的工具。MASCC COG-IMPACT和支持材料可以通过MASCC网页或MASCC COG-IMPACT开放科学框架网页(https://osf.io/5zc3a/)访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The MASCC COG-IMPACT: An unmet needs assessment for cancer-related cognitive impairment impact developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.

Purpose: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can have a profound impact on the lives of cancer survivors. A multitude of subjective and objective assessment tools exist to assess the presence and severity of CRCI. However, no purpose-built tool exists to assess the unmet needs of cancer survivors directly relating to CRCI. This paper details the development and initial validation of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer - Unmet Needs Assessment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment Impact (the MASCC COG-IMPACT).

Methods: A multistep mixed-methods measurement development and validation approach was taken with a strong emphasis on co-design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with cancer survivors (n = 32) and oncology health professionals (n = 19), followed by a modified Delphi survey with oncology health professionals (n = 29). Cognitive interviews with cancer survivors (n = 22) over two rounds were then conducted to finalise the penultimate version of the unmet needs assessment tool for CRCI. Four-hundred and ninety-one (n = 491) cancer survivors then completed the MASCC COG-IMPACT and other established measures to inform structural, reliability, validity, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility analyses.

Results: The final MASCC COG-IMPACT is a 55-item and eight subscale tool including two indices: "difficulties" and "unmet needs". The MASCC COG-IMPACT was found to have strong structural validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The MASCC COG-IMPACT was also found to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.

Conclusion: The MASCC COG-IMPACT may facilitate optimal care and referral in line with a cancer survivor's CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. The MASCC COG-IMPACT may also be used to explore factors and contributors to CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. Overall, the MASCC COG-IMPACT is a highly reliable and valid tool for the assessment of CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs in both clinical and research settings. The MASCC COG-IMPACT and supporting materials can be accessed on the MASCC webpage or via the MASCC COG-IMPACT Open Science Framework webpage ( https://osf.io/5zc3a/ ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Photobiomodulation for oral mucositis in cancer care: prevention, clinical management, and evidence from randomized controlled trials. Folic acid deficiency in cancer therapy: a review of chemotherapy-induced malabsorption and supportive care strategies. A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of salivary substitute and fluoride varnish on radiation caries in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Beyond the patient: how providers perceive and experience non-medical barriers in gastrointestinal cancer care. The effects of Reiki practice on breast cancer patients: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1