核磁共振预测导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤累及主胰管。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04801-6
Dong Wook Kim, Boyeon Koo, Jae Ho Byun, In Hye Song, Hwajin Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Seung Soo Lee, Hyoung Jung Kim, Ki Byung Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Dae Wook Hwang
{"title":"核磁共振预测导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤累及主胰管。","authors":"Dong Wook Kim,&nbsp;Boyeon Koo,&nbsp;Jae Ho Byun,&nbsp;In Hye Song,&nbsp;Hwajin Lee,&nbsp;Jin Hee Kim,&nbsp;Seung Soo Lee,&nbsp;Hyoung Jung Kim,&nbsp;Ki Byung Song,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Dae Wook Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04801-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the measurement of main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter on MRI for predicting MPD involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 595 patients with surgically confirmed IPMN who underwent preoperative MRI from 2015 to 2022. Three independent readers measured the maximum MPD diameter on two-dimensional axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging. Inter-plane and inter-reader agreements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multivariable logistic regression identified clinical and radiological factors associated with MPD involvement. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MPD diameter cutoffs, including the 5-mm threshold from the 2024 International Consensus Guidelines, were calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 595 patients (mean age: 64.6 years ± 8.6, 394 men), 423 (71.1%) had IPMN with MPD involvement, whereas 172 (28.9%) did not have MPD involvement. The mean maximum MPD diameter was 7.9 ± 5.1 mm. Inter-plane agreement was excellent (ICC = 0.977–0.988), as was inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.963). Only a large MPD diameter on MRI was independently associated with MPD involvement (odds ratio = 1.29 [95% confidence interval; 1.14–1.47], <i>p</i> &lt;.01). Use of a maximum MPD diameter cutoff of ≥ 5 mm for MPD involvement yielded accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 76.0%, 79.2%, and 68.0%, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite excellent inter-plane and inter-reader agreement, the MRI-based prediction of MPD involvement in IPMN has limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"3712 - 3721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of main pancreatic duct involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms on magnetic resonance imaging\",\"authors\":\"Dong Wook Kim,&nbsp;Boyeon Koo,&nbsp;Jae Ho Byun,&nbsp;In Hye Song,&nbsp;Hwajin Lee,&nbsp;Jin Hee Kim,&nbsp;Seung Soo Lee,&nbsp;Hyoung Jung Kim,&nbsp;Ki Byung Song,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Dae Wook Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04801-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the measurement of main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter on MRI for predicting MPD involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 595 patients with surgically confirmed IPMN who underwent preoperative MRI from 2015 to 2022. Three independent readers measured the maximum MPD diameter on two-dimensional axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging. Inter-plane and inter-reader agreements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multivariable logistic regression identified clinical and radiological factors associated with MPD involvement. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MPD diameter cutoffs, including the 5-mm threshold from the 2024 International Consensus Guidelines, were calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 595 patients (mean age: 64.6 years ± 8.6, 394 men), 423 (71.1%) had IPMN with MPD involvement, whereas 172 (28.9%) did not have MPD involvement. The mean maximum MPD diameter was 7.9 ± 5.1 mm. Inter-plane agreement was excellent (ICC = 0.977–0.988), as was inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.963). Only a large MPD diameter on MRI was independently associated with MPD involvement (odds ratio = 1.29 [95% confidence interval; 1.14–1.47], <i>p</i> &lt;.01). Use of a maximum MPD diameter cutoff of ≥ 5 mm for MPD involvement yielded accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 76.0%, 79.2%, and 68.0%, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite excellent inter-plane and inter-reader agreement, the MRI-based prediction of MPD involvement in IPMN has limitations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"3712 - 3721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04801-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04801-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨MRI测量主胰管(MPD)直径对预测导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)累及主胰管的价值。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2015年至2022年595例手术确诊的IPMN患者术前MRI检查。三个独立的读取器在二维轴位和冠状面t2加权成像上测量MPD最大直径。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估平面间和读者间的一致性。多变量logistic回归确定了与MPD相关的临床和放射学因素。计算MPD直径截止值的准确性、敏感性和特异性,包括2024年国际共识指南中的5毫米阈值。结果:595例患者(平均年龄:64.6岁±8.6岁,男性394例)中,423例(71.1%)IPMN合并MPD, 172例(28.9%)未合并MPD。平均最大MPD直径为7.9±5.1 mm。平面间一致性极好(ICC = 0.977 ~ 0.988),读者间一致性极好(ICC = 0.963)。只有MRI上MPD直径较大与MPD受病独立相关(优势比= 1.29[95%可信区间;[1.14-1.47], p结论:尽管平面间和阅读器间的一致性很好,但基于mri的IPMN中MPD受损伤的预测存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of main pancreatic duct involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms on magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose

To evaluate the measurement of main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter on MRI for predicting MPD involvement in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN).

Methods

This retrospective study included 595 patients with surgically confirmed IPMN who underwent preoperative MRI from 2015 to 2022. Three independent readers measured the maximum MPD diameter on two-dimensional axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging. Inter-plane and inter-reader agreements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multivariable logistic regression identified clinical and radiological factors associated with MPD involvement. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MPD diameter cutoffs, including the 5-mm threshold from the 2024 International Consensus Guidelines, were calculated.

Results

Of the 595 patients (mean age: 64.6 years ± 8.6, 394 men), 423 (71.1%) had IPMN with MPD involvement, whereas 172 (28.9%) did not have MPD involvement. The mean maximum MPD diameter was 7.9 ± 5.1 mm. Inter-plane agreement was excellent (ICC = 0.977–0.988), as was inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.963). Only a large MPD diameter on MRI was independently associated with MPD involvement (odds ratio = 1.29 [95% confidence interval; 1.14–1.47], p <.01). Use of a maximum MPD diameter cutoff of ≥ 5 mm for MPD involvement yielded accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 76.0%, 79.2%, and 68.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

Despite excellent inter-plane and inter-reader agreement, the MRI-based prediction of MPD involvement in IPMN has limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years Amniotic sheets: Imaging features, subtypes, and obstetric outcomes Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms in male patients exhibit different clinical and imaging features compared with those in female patients Development and validation: a whole-tumor histogram model based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing tumor deposits in rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1